SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production | 2025

Responsible procurement and materials

Ethical purchasing, waste-service responsibilities, material use and the scope of supplier requirements.

Waste measurement and public reporting

Dated waste-audit evidence and public institutional reporting containing sustainability.

 

SDG icon: United Nations. UN logo and icon guidelines (PDF).

The content of this publication has not been approved by the United Nations and does not reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States.

The University of the Western Cape connects responsible resource use with campus governance, waste research and community partnerships. Its 2025 work includes research into residence waste, practical collection systems, food loss and the recovery of valuable materials. Dated institutional policies and earlier environmental initiatives provide context for this work, while the evidence distinguishes policy commitments, research findings and measured operational results.

Responsible procurement and materials

Operational measures

Ethical sourcing of food and supplies

UWC's Procurement Policy requires ethical conduct, fair and legal trade practices, conflict disclosure and supplier monitoring. Its safety, health and environment principle addresses pollution and resource use, and its purchasing scope applies regardless of funding source. The complete provisions retain their amendment and commencement qualifications. [P03] [P08]

Evidence and context

Procurement and responsible sourcing

UWC’s Central Procurement division describes its role as university-wide oversight, compliance and practical guidance for purchasing goods and services. The Business Processing page links this work to the Council-approved Procurement Policy and includes supplier terms. The page describes the procurement function without giving a date for these arrangements. [P08, Institutional page; Procurement subsection]

The Procurement Policy’s March 2025 amendment covers purchases regardless of funding source. Its safety, health and environment principle addresses students, staff and service providers, pollution reduction and better use of natural resources. It requires fair dealing, integrity, conflict disclosure and departmental monitoring of suppliers. The policy also requires fair, ethical and legal trade practices, fair treatment of suppliers and protection of confidential information. Specified relaxation routes apply to research and information-resource purchases. The 2018 infrastructure addendum identifies waste reduction as one reason for early contractor involvement. The cover retains the original 2008 implementation date, while clause 3.1 leaves commencement to Council. Clause 3.2 expressly replaces the September 2020 policy. The original implementation date does not establish the commencement date of the 2025 amendments. [P03, Sections 2–3, 5.4, 6–8, 28–29; addendum 4.3–4.3.3. Physical pages 11–18, 32–33, 44]

PROCUREMENT POLICY: source provisions

The 27 March 2025 amendment is recorded on the original cover. The cover’s initial implementation date belongs to the original policy; a separate commencement date for this amendment is not stated.

UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE / PROCUREMENT POLICY

UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE
PROCUREMENT POLICY
Document Type
Policy
Council First Approval Ref Number
C2008/01
Implementation Date
19 March 2008
Revision / Amendment 1
C2012/01 (27 March 2012)
Revision / Amendment 2
C2016/01 (28 January 2016)
Revision / Amendment 3
C2020/03 (17 September 2020)
Revision / Amendment 4
C2025/01 (27 March 2025)
Policy Owner
Executive Director: Finance and Services
Executive Management Portfolio
Executive Director: Finance and Services
Policy Author
Procurement Manager
Contributors
Budget Owners, Legal, Senate Task Team, Internal and External Auditors, Policies from Other Universities, Procurement Committee, Council
Circulated by:
A Regal, J Thampi
Circulated to:
Procurement Committee Executive Management
UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN CAPE (UWC)
PROCUREMENT POLICY

Amended by Council, 27 March 2025 (C2025/01)

Amended by Council, 17 September 2020 (C2020/03)

Amended by Council, 28 January 2016 (C2016/01)

Amended by Council, 27 March 2012 (C2012/01)

Approved by Council, 19 March 2008 (C2008/01)

A place of quality, a place to grow, from hope to action through knowledge

Procurement Policy: main-policy provisions
2. POLICY STATEMENT

The purpose of this Policy is to develop, implement and maintain sound and sustainable management of the procurement processes of the University by establishing principles, norms, standards and other requirements. This Policy applies to all procurement irrespective of the origin of the funds used.

The main principles identified are;

Effectiveness
Govern and regulate the purchase of Goods and Services in a manner to best serve the University’s mission, and operational and strategic activities;
Transparency
Ensure transparency and accountability, and establish appropriate lines of responsibility in the procurement processes and the financial affairs of the University;
Best Value for Money
Accord with prescribed standards and specifications in a manner that will not compromise the quality of Goods procured and the efficiency of Services rendered to the University community, while realising the best value for money, minimizing risk and safeguarding the University’s interest;
Fairness
All service providers shall be dealt with fairly and without unfair discrimination.
Efficiency
The policy and processes shall not impede he operational and strategic activities of the University.
Responsibility and Accountability
Outline the role and responsibilities of all parties involved in the procurement process as identified in this Policy.
Co-Ordination and Optimization
Foster greater optimization of purchasing by the University community and thereby enhancing efficiency in using financial and other resources to the benefit of all;
Corporate Governance
Enhance and promote good corporate governance principles at all levels and within all structures of the University; and ensure compliance with all relevant legislation that govern the procurement of Goods and Services.
Collaborative Procurement
Promotion of collaborative contracts with external entities with whom the University has a common interest. Optimize collaboration with other Regional Universities, Cape Higher Educational Procurement Consortia, (CHEC), and other initiatives that might benefit the University.
Commitment to Safety, Health and Environment (SHE)
The University is committed to the health and safety of its students, staff and its service providers in the Procurement Process. The University is committed to preservation of the environment, minimizing pollution and the improved use of natural resources in the application of its procurement processes.
Transformation and Development
Support national, provincial and regional mandates relating to Transformation, Supplier Development and Community Development.
Student Entrepreneurship
Create designated and regulated environments that support the nurture and development of University student entrepreneurship initiatives, within the rules of the Higher Education Act and other applicable legislation.

[P03, 2; physical PDF pages 11, 12]

3. COMMENCEMENT AND APPLICATION
3.1 Commencement

This Policy shall come into effect on a date to be determined by Council, from which date all units of the University shall observe, implement and comply with the terms and conditions of this Policy.

3.2 Repeal of Policy dated September 2020

This Policy replaces the Procurement Policy Finance / C2020/2020 dated 17 September 2020, as amended.

3.3 Application

3.3.1 This Policy applies to the procurement of all Goods and Services for and on behalf of the University regardless of funding.

3.3.2 This Policy shall apply to all procurement by the University

3.3.3 This Policy prevails over all other policies related to the procurement of Goods and Services. Accordingly, all persons involved at various levels of the University in the procurement of Goods or Services shall –

3.3.3.1 interpret and apply this Policy congruently with any other policies of the University to the extent that such congruency is possible;

3.3.3.2 apply this Policy in preference to any other policies of the University in the event that ambiguity and/or conflict and/or vagueness exists between this Policy and other policies of the University.

3.3.3.3 apply the terms of this Policy as the minimum criteria required with respect to the procurement of Goods and Services, but may apply more stringent or specific criteria, provided that such criteria are reasonable and justified.

3.3.4 This Policy must be read in conjunction with all other University Policies, including, but not limited to:

• Budget Policy

• Fixed Asset Policy and Procedure

• Grants and Contracts Policy

• Travel Policy

• Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy

• Policy on Legal Matters and signing of Contracts and Agreements

Where the Procurement policy is in conflict with any other policy, the Procurement policy shall prevail on matters relating to Procurement.

3.3.5 Reasonable attempts shall be made by the University to ensure that other policies are aligned with the terms of this Policy.

3.3.6 The conditions, provisions, requirements or terms of this Policy may be relaxed for the purchase and renewal of software licenses of information resources (e.g. books and access to databases for the University’s Library Services), annual subscriptions and software licenses.

3.3.7 The conditions, provisions, requirements or terms of this Policy may be relaxed for the procurement of facilitators, tutors and highly technical specialised research material and equipment, publishers, transcriber, editors and the appointment of academic and professional consultants, subject to the proviso’s in 8.4

[P03, 3; physical PDF pages 13, 14]

5.4 The responsibility for monitoring and managing the supply of Goods and Services by Suppliers/Service Providers rests with the department responsible for such Goods and Services.

[P03, 5.4; physical PDF pages 15]

6. ETHICAL OBLIGATION AND STANDARDS

6.1 All Persons in the procurement process shall act in the best interests of the University at all times and observe the following fiduciary duties:

6.1.1 not exceed the powers conferred upon them in terms of the Act, the Institutional Statute, this Policy and, if applicable, their respective employment agreements;

6.1.2 not exercise their powers for an improper or collateral purpose by abusing their positions in order to derive a direct or indirect personal or private benefit or advantage including but not limited to a financial interest;

6.1.3 maintain their independent discretion, thought and reason in the execution of their obligations and duties set out in this Policy;

6.1.4 avoid a situation which may give rise to a conflict of interests for the University or its stakeholders. This shall include, but not be limited to:

6.1.4.1 observing and implementing the Conflicts of Interest Provisions contained in this Policy;

6.1.4.2 Recusing themselves from participating in any aspect of a procurement process where such Person has a financial interest.

6.1.4.3 dealing with the University in any manner other than openly and in good faith;

6.1.4.4 making a secret profit or;

6.1.4.5 taking economic opportunities or misusing confidential information of the University.

6.1.4.6 soliciting donations, gifts and gratuities, including the rendering of services or providing Goods without fair or market related compensation, from University Vendors or prospective vendors unless the necessary consent has been granted by the Executive Director Finance and Services or his/her nominee.

6.1.5 It is recorded that if a Person undertakes any of the actions or events contemplated in the above clause, such action or undertaking could inter alia:

6.1.5.1 compromise or call into question the impartiality and/or independence of such person in the execution of his/her responsibilities and duties in terms of this Policy;

6.1.5.2 compromise or prejudice the University’s interests including, but not limited to, the financial, operational, legal, reputational or other interests of the University; and/or

6.1.5.3 create a perception of a conflict of interest between the interests of the University and his/her personal or private interests.

6.2 In order to create an environment where business can be conducted with integrity and in a fair and reasonable manner, the Persons involved in the procurement process and in the management thereof, shall at all times act with integrity and with the highest ethical standards.

6.3 All Persons and procurement representatives shall ensure that their conduct complies with legislation, regulations, university’s policies and procedures applicable.

6.4 All employees implementing or transacting via the University Procurement system must be appropriately trained and sufficiently proficient in procurement principles as well as the use of the University Procurement systems in order to procure without subjecting the University to undue risk or inefficiency.

6.5 In the event that any Person breaches any terms or conditions of this Policy, the University shall be entitled, without prejudice to any of its rights in terms of this Policy or law, to take such action against the Person in terms of the applicable Disciplinary Code.

6.6 No Persons involved in the recommendation, review and appointment process shall have a direct or indirect financial interest in a Supplier/Service Provider/Trade Vendor involved in the procurement process;

[P03, 6; physical PDF pages 15, 16]

7. DECLARATION OF INTEREST

7.1 Any Person involved in the procurement, tender or supplier evaluation process must complete and sign the applicable declaration of interest form.

7.2 Any Person with an interest that may affect or could be seen to affect their impartiality shall immediately declare their interest in writing, withdraw entirely from the process and relinquish all further related duties to his/her line manager.

[P03, 7; physical PDF pages 16, 17]

8. COMBATING CORRUPTION AND ABUSE

8.1 The Procurement Manager shall combat the abuse of procurement processes in general and investigate complaints lodged with him/her or which come to his/her knowledge. These investigations may involve the conduct of an official, or other role-player relative to fraud, corruption, favouritism, unfairness, irregular or unlawful practices or failure to comply with this Policy. The Procurement Manager shall, if reasonable grounds exist to do so:

8.1.1 institute appropriate steps against such official or other role player, provided that such steps shall at all times comply with the policy and processes of the University and / or if applicable the relevant laws of South Africa.

8.1.2 refer a matter to the Investigation Working Group

8.1.3 after consultation with the Director: Business Processing and the Executive Director: Finance and Services, report any alleged criminal conduct to the South African Police Service.

8.2 The Executive Director: Finance and Services may reject a recommendation for the award of an order and/or contract if the Preferred Supplier or Person or entity submitting a Quotation or Tender or any Director(s), Member(s), Partner(s) as the case may be, has committed a corrupt or fraudulent act in competing for the provision of Goods and Services to the University or the award of a particular contract.

8.3 The University may invalidate recommendations or decisions that were unlawfully or improperly made, taken or influenced.

8.3.1 The Executive Director: Finance and Services may cancel a contract awarded to a Person or Entity if –

8.3.1.1 the Person committed a corrupt or fraudulent act during the Procurement Process or the execution of the contract, or

8.3.1.2 an official or other role player committed any corrupt or fraudulent act during the Procurement Process or in the execution of the contract;

8.3.2 The Procurement Manager and/or the Director: Business Processing may reject the Quotation, or Tender Response of any Person if that Person or any of its directors, officials, employees or representatives has –

8.3.2.1 failed, during any time during the last 10 (ten) years prior to the submission of the Quotation or Tender Response, to perform satisfactorily on a previous contract with the University.

8.3.2.2 abused the procurement system of the University or has committed any improper conduct in relation to the procurement processes;

8.3.2.3 been convicted of fraud or corruption during the past 10 (ten) years prior to the submission of Quotations or Tender Response;

8.3.2.4 been listed in the Register of Tender Defaulters in terms of section 29 of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No. 12 of 2004 or has been listed on National Treasury's database as a Person prohibited from doing business with the public sector;

8.3.2.5 terminated an agreement with the University within 10 (ten) years prior to the submission of the Quotation or the Tender Response then at hand; and

8.3.2.6 been suspected by the South African Revenue Service or found guilty by a court of law of tax evasion or any other offence involving tax matters.

8.3.2.7 in the case of the Person or Directors or Members, any civil judgments against their name unless proof of payment of the judgment debt or a rescission of the judgment or proof of a pending appeal against the judgment is provided upon request.

8.3.3 Where a Service Provider’s contract is cancelled in terms of 8.3.1 or submission rejected in terms of 8.3.2, the University has the right to list such Service Providers in a “Prohibited Vendors Schedule”.

8.3.3.1 The Procurement Manager, Director Business Processing and the Executive Director of Finance and Services shall have authority to add or remove such Service Providers from the “Prohibited Vendor’s Schedule”.

8.3.3.2 All University stakeholders are prohibited from transacting on behalf of the University with any Service Provider listed on the “Prohibited Vendors Schedule” without the written consent of the Procurement Manager.

8.3.3.3 Any such cancellation or rejection must be reported to the Executive Director: Finance and Services.

8.4 Consultants should only be engaged when the necessary skills and/or resources to perform a project, duty, study or other services are not available and the University cannot be reasonably expected either to train or to recruit people in the time available and further be monitored.

8.5 Any official in a Procurement related role who becomes aware of a breach of, or failure to comply with, any aspect of the Procurement Policy must immediately report the breach or failure to the Executive Director: Finance and Services, in writing.

[P03, 8; physical PDF pages 17, 18]

28. CODE OF ETHICS

28.1 All office bearers, officials and staff involved in the procurement process undertake to uphold the Code of Ethics to protect the integrity of the Tender and purchasing process. This Code of Ethics is intended to supplement but not replace the University's Code of Ethics. In doing so, they pledge to –

28.1.1 give first consideration to the objectives and policies of the University;

28.1.2 strive to obtain the maximum value for each rand of expenditure;

28.1.3 decline personal gifts or gratuities from Suppliers/Service Provider in excess of R1 000.00 (One Thousand Rand) per gift or gratuity subject to clause 29 below;

28.1.4 grant all competitive Suppliers/Service Provider equal consideration insofar as the University's Policy permits;

28.1.5 conduct business with potential and current Suppliers/Service Provider in an atmosphere of good faith, devoid of intentional misrepresentation;

28.1.6 demand honesty in sales representation whether offered through the medium of a verbal or written statement, an advertisement, or a sample of the product;

28.1.7 receive consent of originator of proprietary ideas and designs before using them for competitive purchasing purposes;

28.1.8 make any reasonable effort to negotiate an equitable and mutually agreeable settlement of any dispute with a Supplier/Service Provider within the established policies of the institution;

28.1.9 accord a prompt and courteous reception insofar as conditions permit to all who call on legitimate business missions;

28.1.10 co-operate with trade, industrial and professional associations and with governmental and private agencies for the purposes of promoting and developing sound business methods; and

28.1.11 foster fair, ethical and legal trade practices.

[P03, 28; physical PDF pages 32, 33]

29. GIFTS AND GRATUITIES

29.1 For purposes of this clause –

29.1.1 "Corrupt Activities Act" means the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No. 12 of 2004;

29.1.2 "Gift/s" means any gift, gratuity (including gratification as defined in the Corrupt Activities Act), form of benefit or service given, issued or offered by a current or potential Supplier/Service Provider to an Employee/s or Member of Management that is intended for the personal benefit of and/or use by such Employee/s or Member of Management, where the current or potential Supplier/Service Provider does not expect or require the recipient of the Gift to pay for such Gift; and

29.2 All Employees shall, in writing, declare to and inform the Procurement Department of every instance where a Supplier/Service Provider has offered such Employee, for his/her individual or personal benefit any Gift with a value in excess of R1 000.00 (One Thousand Rand) per gift.

[P03, 29; physical PDF pages 33]

ADDENDUM PROCUREMENT POLICY: INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK

ADDENDUM PROCUREMENT POLICY: INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK
Council Approval Reference
C2016/01
Implementation Date
28 January 2016
ADDENDUM APPROVAL
C2018/4
Date of Addendum Approval
28 June 2018
Policy Owner
Procurement
Executive Management Portfolio
Finance & Services
Review Date
28 January 2021
Circulated by:
 
Circulated to:
 
University of the Western Cape
POLICY:
ADDENDUM
to the
PROCUREMENT POLICY
INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK
Policy approved by Council (C2016/01) 28 January 2016
Addendum approved by Council (C2018/04, item 7.2.6) 28 June 2018
Infrastructure Framework addendum: early contractor involvement

4.3 The University may adopt the practice of early contractor involvement. By doing so the contractor contribute construction knowledge, experience and inputs earlier than normal to reduce costs, before the cost proposal for detailed design and construction is agreed. When engaging with a contractor on an early contractor involvement basis, it is done on a cost based pricing strategy.

4.3.1 Cost Based Pricing can be based on;

4.3.1.1 Cost Reimbursable - The contractor is paid for his actual expenditure plus a percentage fee.

4.3.1.2 Target Cost - A cost reimbursable contract in which a target price is estimated and on completion of the works, the difference between the target price and actual cost is apportioned between UWC and the Contractor on an agreed basis.

4.3.2 Escape clauses can be inserted into design and construct contracts to enable the employer to use the designs and approach the open market in the event that agreement cannot be reached regarding the target cost.

4.3.3 The reasons for early contractor involvement include collaboration, minimisation of waste, integration of design and construction, value for money and utilisation of market capacity.

[P03, Addendum 4.3–4.3.3; physical PDF pages 44]

 

Open/download the complete Procurement Policy with Infrastructure Framework Addendum (PDF)

Back to the overview

Waste disposal covering hazardous materials

A 2016 waste-service tender specified collection, transport and disposal across categories including hazardous and bio-hazardous materials, statutory compliance and records. It remains a dated procurement requirement. General supplier safety duties are retained under Outsourced service responsibilities, alongside the separate residence study observations under Waste measurement evidence. [I06] [P07] [I01]

Evidence and context

Historical requirements for waste services

A 2016 invitation to tender issued through PURCO SA sought collection, transport and disposal across UWC waste categories, including hazardous and bio-hazardous material. It also requested sorting, expansion of recycling, separation at source, statutory compliance and comprehensive records. The invitation shows that these requirements appeared in an earlier procurement process. An invitation does not establish that a contract was awarded or that its requirements were delivered in 2024 or 2025. [I06, Tender scope and eligibility, PUR 3201/5 (UWC08/2016)]

Back to the overview

Policy for measuring landfill and recycled waste

The Infrastructure Management Policy requires facilities services, including waste management, to be performed properly and staff or contractor performance to be measured and reported against specifications. The full policy retains its 2022 dates and lifecycle responsibilities. The residence research provides separate, specifically scoped material measurements. [P01] [I01]

Evidence and context

Managing resources across their full life cycle

UWC’s Infrastructure Management Policy treats resources as assets to be planned, used, maintained, adapted and ultimately disposed of across their working lives. Approved on 22 September 2022 and implemented the next day, it links environmental and social considerations with service requirements, affordability and long-term costs. Waste management appears explicitly among the facilities services whose delivery and contractor performance must be measured and reported. ICT planning also provides for adaptable systems, replacement planning, controlled asset movement and responsible decommissioning and disposal. [P01, Cover; preamble; sections 3, 4.2.2 and 4.4]

Infrastructure Management Policy: original document control

UWC
Infrastructure Management Policy
Council Approval Reference Number
 
First Approval
C2022/03 (22 September 2022)
Amendments
 
Implementation Date
23 September 2022
Revision / Amendment
n/a
Revision / Amendment Date
n/a
Provisos
n/a
Policy Owner
Infrastructure and Engineering
Executive Management Portfolio
ED – Finance and Services
Contributors
EMC, SPRC, SEC, IBDC, Council
Circulated by:
Executive Director – Finance and Services
Circulated to:
Institutional Planning and Infrastructure and Engineering staff members.

[P01, original cover; physical PDF page 1]

Preamble on whole life management

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

Preamble

Infrastructure management is not just a matter of maintaining existing infrastructure or providing new infrastructure. The focus of this Policy is on balancing these aspects and providing a high-level strategic framework for infrastructure provision and the utilisation thereof. Such an approach requires direction on decision making throughout the infrastructure planning, delivery, operation and disposal processes, it spans the focus of various management and governance structures and follows a risk- based approach to achieve a balance between whole life cost, risk, performance, and sustainability, through:

• providing a defined and agreed level of service and performance monitoring;

• taking a life-cycle approach to developing cost effective management strategies for the long term that meet the desired level of service;

• identifying, assessing and appropriately managing risks; and

• having a medium to long term financial plan which identifies required expenditure and how it will be funded.

It is necessary to determine acceptable and functionally appropriate levels of service, so that infrastructure requirements (and performance and utilisation) can be measured against a set yardstick. Criteria may relate to availability of the service, quality or condition, quantity, reliability, responsiveness, environmental acceptability and financial implications.

Levels of service are informed by a combination of stakeholder needs, legislative requirements and internal business objectives, and need to be sustainable over the estimated service life of the infrastructure. This is a vital part of the infrastructure management process that not only affects decisions on existing infrastructure but also informs choices and decisions affecting the maintenance of existing infrastructure and the provision of new infrastructure.

Infrastructure assets, which support the objectives of the institution, exist to provide value to the University. To ensure that value is maximised, there is a need to understand what infrastructure is required, what infrastructure exists, how well it is being utilised, what condition it is in, its fitness for purpose, its operational costs, and its ability to evolve in changing circumstances.

This Policy will be supported by:

1) The Fixed Asset Policy;

2) Procurement Policy

3) Budget Policy

4) Campus Development Plan; and

5) An annually-updated 3-5-year Infrastructure Management Plan. [P01, Preamble on whole life management; physical PDF pages 3; printed pages 3]

Sections 1 and 2 Purpose and scope

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

1 Purpose

The purpose of this Infrastructure Management Policy is to establish a Council approved policy for key infrastructure-related principles and objectives that the University’s executive management needs to pursue over time. The Policy is supported by

a) a long-term spatial development framework (Campus Development Plan); and

b) an annually-updated 3-5-year infrastructure management plan; which promote the efficient, economic, effective and sustainable use of resources.

2 Scope

This document establishes the University’s policy for the management of its infrastructure. It includes the management of:

a) the demand for infrastructure;

b) the creation and prioritisation of a pipeline of interventions; as well as

Section 3 Infrastructure and asset management

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

3 Definition of concepts

Infrastructure comprises immovable assets which are acquired or constructed or which result from construction operations and includes moveable assets which cannot function independently from purpose built immoveable assets. It includes Information and Communication Technology (ICT) networks and systems that are used to communicate and to create disseminate, store and manage information, as well as security technology installations.

Asset management seeks to effectively, efficiently, economically and sustainably utilise infrastructure to serve the current and emerging needs of the University. Asset management accordingly considers the entire lifecycle (service life) of the infrastructure asset and the associated costs, from the identification of a need through operating costs, and finally to the final decommissioning and disposal of the asset. [P01, Section 3 Infrastructure and asset management; physical PDF pages 4; printed pages 4]

Section 4.1 Development and resource decisions

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

4.1 Infrastructure development at UWC

In proposing infrastructure development projects that include the acquisition or construction of new buildings as well as the repurposing and modernisation of existing infrastructure, the University will give due consideration to:

a) The alignment of the proposed infrastructure development with the University’s strategic intentions as articulated in its Institutional Operating Plan and the Campus Development Plan;

b) Affordability and future financial commitments.

c) Continue to apply and seek to optimise the funding opportunities provided by the DHET's infrastructure grants, and in doing so will seek to find a balance between projects focusing on:

1) UWC's academic project, including new programme areas. In this regard the University will seek to find a balance between the repurposing and refurbishment of old infrastructure and new developments / acquisitions;

2) Student growth and the capacity of infrastructure;

3) The needs of students and improving their university experience, especially at smaller campus sites; and

4) Addressing compliance issues and backlog maintenance.

d) Where feasible the university will increase the provision of ablution facilities that are:

1) Accessible and that serves the requirements of disabled students and staff; and

2) Gender-neutral to support the needs of the University’s gender-diverse student and staff population.

e) Optimising appropriate income-generating activities where these opportunities exist or can be established. [P01, Section 4.1 Development and resource decisions; physical PDF pages 4,5; printed pages 4,5]

Section 4.2 introduction and 4.2.1 Life cycle planning

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

4.2 Management of infrastructure

The University will manage its infrastructure based on the principles set out in Annexure A. The University’s Executive Management is responsible for all aspects of infrastructure management and these functions are largely executed on its behalf by the Executive Director: Finance and Services. In this regard the University will attend to:

4.2.1 Life-cycle infrastructure asset management planning for large individual assets or groups of infrastructure assets, which include operation, maintenance and refurbishment requirements. This planning will inform major refurbishment or upgrading requirements which are incorporated into the infrastructure management plan. [P01, Section 4.2 introduction and 4.2.1 Life cycle planning; physical PDF pages 5; printed pages 5]

Section 4.2.2 Facilities services and contractor performance

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

The sub-list begins with 5) in the source original. Its numbering is retained.

4.2.2 Facilities management, ensuring that:

a) the necessary internal and external facilities management resources are in place;

b) engineering infrastructure management including the following, occurs:

5) budgeting and preparation for planned as well as unplanned maintenance;

6) regular checking of hard services (mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) services) to keep them serviceable with special attention being paid to critical infrastructure;

7) identification and establishment of condition monitoring and inspection plans as per the operating and maintenance manuals to check, test or replace infrastructure systems, subsystems, assemblies or components;

8) preventative (scheduled, routine) maintenance plans are drafted and implemented;

9) all breakdowns are addressed immediately and repairs planned and prioritised; and

10) a record is made of infrastructure breakdowns and incidents which can be analysed to identify trends to inform decisions;

c) the day to day soft services (e.g. cleaning, security, catering, fire protection, waste management, reception services) are done properly and that staff or contractors and their performance is measured and reported against performance specifications; and

d) demobilisation of facilities management (e.g. Service Level Agreements) for infrastructure that will be disposed of as well as for infrastructure earmarked for upgrades, refurbishments or rehabilitation. [P01, Section 4.2.2 Facilities services and contractor performance; physical PDF pages 5; printed pages 5]

Section 4.2.3 Infrastructure information and risk assurance

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

4.2.3 Progressive development of an infrastructure management system to provide reliable, consistent and updated infrastructure information to enable optimised decisions to be made, which should:

a) be used to inform infrastructure management activities; and

b) provide improved risk control assurance that the objectives in the infrastructure management policy will be achieved on a consistent basis. [P01, Section 4.2.3 Infrastructure information and risk assurance; physical PDF pages 5; printed pages 5]

4.2.4 Entering into leases for infrastructure for use by the University or for the leasing of University infrastructure and the administration thereof.

[P01, section 4.2.4; physical PDF page 5]

Section 4.2.5 Environmental compliance

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

4.2.5 The management of all occupational health and safety and environmental compliance matters in relation to infrastructure and the usage of land. [P01, Section 4.2.5 Environmental compliance; physical PDF pages 5; printed pages 5]

4.2.6 Access management and security required to safeguard University infrastructure and land.

4.2.7 Management of all ICT infrastructure.

4.2.8 Reporting of infrastructure management-related matters to the oversight committees identified in Table 1, who will approve actions that are necessary for the progressive implementation of principles associated with the management of University infrastructure as set out in Annex A.

Table 1: Oversight committees
Item
Area of management
Responsible person
Oversight committee
4.2.8.1
Life-cycle infrastructure asset management planning
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
4.2.8.2
Mobilisation for facilities management
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
4.2.8.3
Development of an infrastructure management system
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
4.2.8.4
Leases for infrastructure
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Finance Committee
4.2.8.5
Occupational health and safety and environmental compliance
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Safety, Health, Environment and Risk Committee
4.2.8.6
Access and security
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Safety, Health, Environment and Risk Committee
4.2.8.7
ICT infrastructure
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Information, Communication and Technology Governance Committee
4.2.8.8
Infrastructure development implementation oversight
Project Boards
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
• Infrastructure Business Development Committee
• Council
4.2.8.9
Infrastructure development project proposals
Executive Management
• Infrastructure and Business Development Committee
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
4.2.8.10
Infrastructure acquisitions
Executive Management
• Infrastructure and Business Development Committee
• Finance Committee
• Council
4.2.8.11
Infrastructure development funding
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Executive Management Committee
• Finance Committee
4.2.8.12
Infrastructure procurement and contract awards
Executive Director: Finance and Services
• Tender Committee

[P01, sections 4.2.6–4.2.8 and complete Table 1; physical PDF pages 6–7]

Section 4.4 ICT adaptability decommissioning and responsible disposal

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

Under section 4.4 the original repeats subsection numbers 4.3.1 and 4.3.2. These are retained unchanged.

4.4 ICT infrastructure plans

4.3.1 ICT infrastructure (including software) plans should:

a) be modular and adaptable and, as far as possible, accommodate growth, additions, changes and integration with other systems;

b) enable changes of components without impacting on the entire system;

c) limit the range of technology employed, to make maintenance and support manageable; and

d) include planning for replacement as equipment becomes obsolete very quickly.

4.3.2 Changes to any of the University’s ICT infrastructure or systems should follow the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) change management framework which include procedures and reporting to control the movement and location of assets and allow for the appropriate decommissioning and responsible disposal of any ICT equipment. [P01, Section 4.4 ICT adaptability decommissioning and responsible disposal; physical PDF pages 7; printed pages 7]

Section 4.5 Infrastructure management plans

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

4.5 Infrastructure management plans

4.5.1 The University will develop an annual Infrastructure Management Plan, that will include planning for new infrastructure, as well as plans for the operation, maintenance, refurbishment and rehabilitation of existing infrastructure, and disposal of infrastructure which is no longer required to meet the University’s objectives, and it will be based on:

a) factors such as policies, norms and standards, condition assessments, functional performance, student enrolment trends, student housing demand trends, current and forecasted levels of optimisation, and academic requirements;

b) the infrastructure planning principles contained in Annexure C;

c) the grouping of projects into programmes to enable cash flow projections for projects during a financial year to be adjusted and funds to be moved between projects within a programme to avoid under-expenditure without changing the purpose for which funds were approved; and

d) the readiness of projects for implementation.

4.5.2 The University will ensure that the following is undertaken for all projects admitted to a pipeline of projects at Stage 0 (Project Initiation) in accordance with the provisions of the University’s Procurement Policy:

a) the identification of the impediments and constraints to project implementation and establishment of the timelines required to resolve them;

b) the identification of high risk critical infrastructure; and

c) the prioritisation of projects and the establishment of realistic budgets and timelines over a 3 to 5-year period. [P01, Section 4.5 Infrastructure management plans; physical PDF pages 7,8; printed pages 7,8]

Annexure A clauses a to f: statutory context, resource value and reuse

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

Annexure A: Principles associated with the management of University infrastructure

The principles associated with the management of the University’s infrastructure are:

a) The requirements of the following regulatory framework need to be met:

• The Occupational Health and Safety Act including the

- Construction Regulations,

- Electrical Installation Regulations

- Pressure Vessel Regulations,

- Lift Escalator and Passenger Conveyer Regulations,

- Driven Machinery and General Machinery Regulations;

• The National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act including the National Building Regulations; and

• The National Heritage Resources Act.

• The National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998

• The National Energy Act No. 34 of 1998

b) All Department of Higher Education and Training infrastructure-related policies need to be adhered to, including the Higher Education Act, Space and Cost Norms for Buildings and other Land Improvements and the Policy on the Minimum Norms and Standards for Student Housing at Public Universities.

c) The value of infrastructure needs to be optimised i.e. the cost of the infrastructure provided to achieve the University’s objectives and service standards should be minimised, whilst also considering environmental, social and economic impacts.

d) Infrastructure needs to be used efficiently and reconfigured or, where practical, disposed of if it does not support the university’s objectives.

e) Infrastructure needs to be maintained and operated in such a way as to minimise life-cycle costs.

f) Where possible, changes in demand for infrastructure need to be met with solutions which do not require the acquisition of new infrastructure, taking into consideration the university’s whole portfolio (for example, maximising the use of existing facilities, or reconfiguring them, rather than building new ones, considering sharing expensive specialist facilities between universities and leasing of existing infrastructure). [P01, Annexure A clauses c to f Resource value and reuse; physical PDF pages 9; printed pages 9]

Annexure A clauses g to i: risk, efficiency and flexibility

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

g) Risks relating to the ownership, use and operation of infrastructure need to be managed as follows:

• the possible consequences of failure of infrastructure needs to be identified and mitigated in a cost-effective manner;

• critical infrastructure should be identified using a risk-based approach by assessing both the probability of failure and the potential impact on the University’s operations;

• high risk infrastructure needs to be prioritised, especially if this is potentially life-threatening or poses a risk to the achievement of the University’s core objectives; and

• the University’s liability in the event of infrastructure-related claims needs to be minimised.

• Appropriate and continuing investment in bulk services infrastructure (water, electricity and fire)

h) The University’s infrastructure should be accessible, energy-efficient, water-efficient and sustainable.

Annexure A clause j Asset register

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

j) All infrastructure needs to be registered in an infrastructure asset register and linked into the University’s accounting system 1. The infrastructure asset register should include information such as:

• date of capitalisation and total acquisition cost;

• ownership of land, registration, location;

• infrastructure identification (including location);

• infrastructure expected useful life and remaining useful life;

• infrastructure condition;

• infrastructure value (based on Depreciated Replacement Cost);

• insurance if applicable;

• dates and costs of repairs, upgrades, replacement and disposals; and

Annexure A clause j Footnote on accounting records

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

1 The Higher Education Act states that the Council of a university must keep complete accounting records of all assets. [P01, Annexure A clause j Footnote on accounting records; physical PDF pages 10; printed pages 10]

Annexure A clauses k to p Condition monitoring and response

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

k) There needs to be periodic condition assessments of infrastructure, the results of which need to be captured on the infrastructure asset register and used to inform infrastructure plans and budgets.

l) There needs to be a periodic assessment of the levels of performance and service that infrastructure delivers, and these should be analysed against the requirements and expectations of users.

m) There needs to be a system or process for prioritisation of repairs.

n) There needs to be a system for handling of complaints and responding to requests from infrastructure users, which should include standards for reasonable response times.

o) There needs to be consultation with relevant stakeholders regarding infrastructure plans.

p) There needs to be ongoing consideration of rapidly evolving technologies (4IR, Smart Buildings etc) and these must be considered in the design, upgrading and utilisation of infrastructure. [P01, Annexure A clauses k to p Condition monitoring and response; physical PDF pages 10; printed pages 10]

Annexure B section 6 Sustainability and concluding framework

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

6) Sustainability and efficiency

Decisions taken in relation to the location, design and management of the institutions need to be geared towards optimal sustainability. The university campuses should play a leadership role in demonstrating sustainable practices. The University should demonstrate best practice in terms of a broad spectrum of environmental and sustainability including efficiency of land utilisation.

The academic vision and the spatial directions of universities should be considered as complementary and synergistic. Direction should accordingly be derived from:

• interrogating the University’s mission statement, which provides the highest order of direction for the spatial development plan, to explore the spatial implications of the academic mission;

• identifying the desirable performance qualities which a university in South Africa in the 21st century should be seeking to achieve which have spatial implications; and

• a comprehensive understanding of the contextual informants (the concrete things which have material substance, shape, topography, environmental character, climate, texture, as well as socio- economic features) which embody very different properties, in accordance with the unique cultural and environmental conditions of the place within which the University campus is located.

Academic vision for a particular campus can also have spatial implications for in the creation of:

• living and working environments of a quality that attracts and retains world renown academics;

• adequate library, student resource amenities, student accommodation with meals and self- catering and IT facilities.

The method employed in the development of spatial plans needs to elevate planning and design from opinion to argument in order to seek sufficient consensus around the desired norms and their spatial implications. [P01, Annexure B section 6 Sustainability and concluding framework; physical PDF pages 13; printed pages 13]

Annexure C Infrastructure planning principles

Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022

Annexure C: Infrastructure planning principles

Infrastructure projects are identified, planned and costed, as relevant, by:

a) obtaining and considering the expectations and requirements of stakeholders in the University;

b) determining appropriate levels of service and identifying the infrastructure required to meet this level of service and to achieve the University’s strategic objectives;

c) establishing an infrastructure baseline by reviewing existing infrastructure assets, including the identification of mission-critical assets;

d) assessing existing infrastructure assets in terms of their efficiency of use, and proposing improvements;

e) identifying any gaps between the existing infrastructure and the required infrastructure;

f) considering all possible ways of meeting the gaps, such as building new infrastructure, renting infrastructure, utilising existing infrastructure more effectively, reconfiguring existing infrastructure or sharing infrastructure with other institutions, to determine the best solutions to the gaps;

g) taking a ‘whole-portfolio’ approach when considering options for addressing gaps, enabling all available options to achieve the required levels of service to be considered, ensuring the provision of infrastructure at the lowest life-cycle cost;

h) analysing asset management information;

i) determining the functional requirements and required level of service for new infrastructure and applying the space and cost norms to the needs for new infrastructure;

j) comparing the needs against the budget, and prioritising in terms of this policy if the needs exceed the budget; and

k) planning for capital projects taking into account the operation and maintenance of the infrastructure for its entire estimated design life after it has been constructed.

l) Integrating sustainability principles and strategies into all projects

m) Future proofing all projects, as far as it is practical and cost-effective, against changes in the environmental (e.g. climate change), technological (e.g. 4IR) and regulatory spheres.

Adequate access control and monitoring infrastructure needs to be put in place to provide a safe environment for the University community.

Credible forecasts of the current and net demand for services or requirements for functionality should be made over a period of not less than ten years. [P01, Annexure C Infrastructure planning principles; physical PDF pages 14; printed pages 14]

 

Open/download the complete Infrastructure Management Policy (PDF)

Back to the overview

Minimising plastic use

The November 2025 residence-waste thesis recommends prevention, reuse, source separation and possible single-use-plastic restrictions. The full research account identifies these as researcher recommendations and retains the limits of its sampled sites and disposal tracing. [I01]

Evidence and context

From research findings to practical questions

The thesis proposes placing greater emphasis on prevention, reuse and separation at source. Its recommendations include clearer signs, more consistent bin arrangements, regular seasonal audits, student involvement, awareness through social media and the curriculum, and consideration of composting or other recovery routes for organics. It also discusses an integrated waste-management plan, possible single-use-plastic restrictions and technology-assisted incentives. These are recommendations made by the researcher, not confirmed university policies or completed projects. [I01, Sections 3.5.1–3.5.5 and Table 5.1]

The research’s limits are important to its practical use. Only two residences contributed physical waste samples, the questionnaire response was small and non-random, and the study covered a limited part of the academic year. It did not trace each measured category to a final disposal or recovery destination. The work consequently provides a useful basis for designing broader monitoring and testing interventions, while leaving university-wide annual generation, recycling and landfill performance to be established through reconciled operational records. [I01, Sections 3.2, 4.2.2 and Limitations of the study]

Back to the overview

Minimising disposable items and using resources again

The Fixed Assets Policy asks buyers to consider upgrading or adapting existing equipment before purchasing another asset and provides controlled disposal routes. A separate July 2025 donation supplied reusable bags made from recovered materials. These accounts retain their different scope: asset stewardship and a documented material-reuse contribution. [P06] [B18]

Evidence and context

Using existing equipment and managing disposal

UWC’s Fixed Assets Policy, amended on 27 March 2025, asks buyers to consider whether existing equipment can be upgraded or adapted before purchasing another asset, and whether the proposed purchase is appropriate, compatible and economical over its life. It calls for reviews of underused or underperforming assets. Disposal of university-owned or leased IT assets is coordinated by Information and Communication Services with approval from the Executive Director of Finance and Services. Donations to charities or community organisations are conditional on the absence of a sales market or disposal costs exceeding expected proceeds, and require authorisation. The policy defines fixed assets by their operational purpose, useful life, retained identity and value threshold. These controls provide a basis for resource stewardship; they do not identify an e-waste recycler or establish recycling volumes. [P06, Sections 2, 8 and 12; physical/printed pages 3–6, 8–9]

FIXED ASSETS POLICY: source provisions

The 27 March 2025 amendment is recorded on the original cover. The cover’s initial implementation date belongs to the original policy; a separate commencement date for this amendment is not stated.

UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE / FIXED ASSETS POLICY

UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE
FIXED ASSETS POLICY
Council Approval
C2001/07
Implementation Date
2001
Revision / Amendment Number 1
C2011/04
24 November 2011
Revision / Amendment Number 2
C2025/01
27 March 2025
Policy Owner
Executive Director: Finance & Services
Policy Author
Director: Finance
Portfolio
Executive Director: Finance & Services
Contributors
Financial Accounting Department; Finance Committee; Council
Circulated by:
Executive Director: Finance & Services
Circulated to:
UWC Staff
Document Reference
C2025.01 F
University of the Western Cape
(UWC)
POLICY:
FIXED ASSETS POLICY
2. DEFINITION

In order for an item to be capitalised and not expensed in the year incurred, it must meet the International Financial Reporting Standards (IAS 16) which defines property, plant and equipment as tangible items which is held for use in the production or supply of goods and services and expected to be used for more than one period.

Definitions:

Asset
An item of property owned by the University, regarded as having value and available to meet obligations of the University.
Donation
An act or instance of presenting something to the University as a gift or contribution to help the University.
Disposal
The action or process of getting rid of something.
Immovable asset
Is an asset which are thought to be stationary in space.
Movable asset
Is an asset which can either move themselves or be moved in space.
PPE
Property, Plant, and Equipment is a non-current, tangible capital asset shown on the Statement of Financial Position of the University and is used to generate revenues.
Sale of asset
This happens when the University sells an asset whether tangible (example; machinery and inventory) or intangible (example; intellectual property).
Scrap
A small piece or amount of something, especially one that is left over after the greater part has been used.
Transfer
A transfer of assets is when property, money, or ownership rights are moved from one entity to another.

Classifications:

Land
Unlimited useful life
Building
Limited useful life
Computer Equipment
Mainframes, servers, laptops, desktop computers and peripherals with limited useful life
Motor Vehicle
Limited useful life
Furniture
All office furniture, laboratory furniture fittings, lecture room furniture fittings with limited useful life
Equipment
All electronic and manual equipment with limited useful life
Intangible Assets
Software developed and acquired with limited useful life

Such items typically have the following characteristics:

• The item must be acquired for use in operations, and not for investment or sale.

• The item must have a useful life of more than one year.

• The item must have an identity which does not change with use.

• The item must usually be repaired and not replaced when damaged.

The purchase threshold is R5000. All items purchased that meet the above criteria will be recorded as an asset if the purchase price is above this threshold.

[P06, 2; physical PDF pages 3, 4]

4. PURCHASING OF FIXED ASSETS

The University has a decentralised purchasing system, whereby departments and institutes manage their own allocated budgets. Assets are therefore purchased directly by the departmental buyer through the creation of an official University purchase order. Procurement of assets from non-capital budgets is not allowed.

Special conditions:

a. All computer equipment must be purchased in consultation and co-operation with the Information and Communication Services department in order to ensure that the equipment is compatible and in line with University standards.

b. Vehicles must be purchased through the Transport Department for all units at the University regardless of where the finances are administered. This procedure also applies to institutions, units and organisations whose funds are administered by the Finance Department.

All purchases of fixed assets must comply with the Procurement Policy of the University.

[P06, 4; physical PDF pages 4, 5]

8. ASSET MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES
8.1 ACQUISITION

In making the decision to acquire an asset, the following fundamental principles should be considered carefully by the buyer:

a. Whether the purpose for which the fixed asset is required is in line with the objectives of the University and whether it will provide significant, direct and tangible benefit to the University.

b. Whether the purchase is absolutely necessary as there is no alternative University asset that could be upgraded or adapted.

c. Whether the fixed asset is appropriate to the task or requirement and cost effective over the life of the asset.

d. Whether the fixed asset is compatible with existing equipment and will not result in unwarranted additional expenditure on other assets or resources.

e. Whether space and other facilities to accommodate the asset are in place.

f. Whether the most suitable type, brand, model etc. has been selected.

g. Whether adequate resources are available for the maintenance & operational requirements of the asset.

8.2 UTILIZATION

All assets should be used for the purpose they were acquired. Asset performance should be regularly reviewed to identify underutilized and underperforming assets. The reason for this should be examined and appropriate action taken.

8.3 SAFEGUARD OF ASSETS

Department Heads are responsible for the security of assets under their control. This includes ensuring that assets are used only by authorised persons, safeguarded against theft and damage and removal from the University premises.

All staff members are responsible for the care and protection of university assets. Every person who utilises the property of the University should do so with due care and consideration and in a manner which ensures that the asset will not be subjected to undue wear and tear or damage.

In instances where assets are lost / damaged due to negligence, the user or responsible person may be held personally liable or subjected to a disciplinary process.

8.4 ACQUISITIONS FROM RESTRICTED AND TRUST FUNDS

Assets purchased with restricted and trust funds are assets of the University and this policy would apply, except where an agreement to the contrary is part of the conditions associated with the obtaining of such funds.

8.5 PHYSICAL VERIFICATION

Physical verification of assets appearing on the University's Fixed asset register shall be undertaken by the Fixed Asset Department, in conjunction with the departments, faculties, institutes or units on a cyclical or random basis during the year. Such verification may be done on a sample basis. Departments, faculties, institutes or units are responsible for providing assistance in this exercise to the best of their ability.

[P06, 8; physical PDF pages 5, 6]

12. DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
12.1 AUTHORITY TO TRADE-IN ASSETS

The delegated authority to trade-in assets is vested in the Director: Financial and Management Accounting and the Executive Director: Finance and Services and in consultation with the Physical Assets and Insurance Department.

12.2 AUTHORITY TO SELL, DISPOSE OR SCRAP ASSETS

All recommendations to sell, dispose or scrap assets must be approved by the Director: Financial and Management Accounting and/or Executive Director: Finance and Services.

12.3 MOTOR VEHICLES

All motor vehicle disposals must be approved by the Executive Director: Finance and Services and the Fixed Assets Department and Physical Assets and Insurance Department.

12.4 COMPUTING EQUIPMENT

Information & Communication Services (ICS) shall coordinate the disposal of all University leased and owned information technology assets with the approval of the Executive Director: Finance and Services.

12.5 ALL OTHER PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

All asset disposals must be approved by the Executive Director: Finance and Services and coordinated by the Fixed Assets Department and Physical Assets and Insurance Department.

12.6 DONATION

Donations to charities or community organisations should only be considered where no sales market exists or where the cost of alternative methods of disposal exceeds the expected proceeds.

Donations of movable assets may only be donated by approval of the Director: Financial and Management Accounting and/or Executive Director: Finance and Services.

12.7 TRANSFER TO OTHER OUTSIDE ORGANISATIONS

Should an asset have been purchased from funding provided for a research project and this project subsequently is transferred to another organisation, then the following conditions apply before the assets may be transferred:

• the particular grant or contract must contain a condition that the assets are not the property of the University;

• the assets must have been purchased from external research funds;

• agreement must be reached between the University and the other institution and

• the Executive Director: Finance and Services is authorised to commit the University in such negotiations.

12.8 THEFT AND LOSS OF ASSETS

In the event of an asset being stolen or lost, Campus Protection Services, Physical Assets and Insurance Department and the Fixed Asset Department are to be notified immediately.

[P06, 12; physical PDF pages 8, 9]

 

Open/download the complete Fixed Assets Policy (PDF)

Reused materials supporting students

At a July 2025 Mandela Day handover, The Fix supported UWC’s #UdubsCares initiative with a R10,000 contribution and reusable items made from recovered materials. The donation included 360 bags made from offcuts of the retailer’s locally produced denim range, together with book bags manufactured from recycled promotional banners. The example connects material reuse with support for students’ food security and dignity. It is a documented donation rather than a University procurement-volume or waste-diversion measure. [B18, Donation account and handover]

The Fix donation handover to UWC, reported 18 July 2025. Photograph: Shelley Christians/UWC. Credit: Shelley Christians/UWC. Image source.

Back to the overview

Policy scope for outsourced services

The linked supplier terms require service providers to follow reasonable UWC procedures and policies supplied in writing or made accessible. They also set safety, hazard-reporting and subcontractor responsibilities. The complete terms remain visible with their undated status and the qualification that incorporation into specific 2024 or 2025 contracts is unverified. [P07]

Evidence and context

Responsibilities placed on service providers

The supplier terms linked by Business Processing require service providers to follow reasonable UWC procedures and policies when supplied in writing or made accessible. They cover campus safety, fire, emergency and security procedures, and allow removal of non-compliant personnel. Providers accept health-and-safety responsibilities for their employees and subcontractors, must report hazards outside their control and supply appropriate protective equipment. The document also commits the parties to dignity, fair treatment and safeguards against sexual and gender-related misconduct. Its body is undated; the filename and PDF metadata indicate 2023, but incorporation into particular 2024 or 2025 contracts is unverified. These general duties are not an explicit extension of plastics or disposable-item minimisation requirements. [P07, Clauses 14, 23 and 26; physical pages 8, 13–17]

ANNEXURE “B”: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS: source provisions

The linked Annexure B has no approval or effective date in its body. Its 2023 filename and PDF creation metadata do not establish incorporation into individual contracts.

ANNEXURE “B”: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS

14. Compliance with Procedures

14.1. It is recorded that during the term of the agreement, UWC or its appointed UWC Representative may implement certain reasonable procedures and policies. The Service Provider shall comply fully with any such reasonable procedures and policies, including the work procedures and health and safety procedures, provided that such policies and procedures shall have been provided to it in writing or is made accessible to the Service Provider.

14.2. The Service Provider shall ensure that it and its personnel shall at all times comply fully with any safety, fire, emergency and security procedures and policies applicable at UWC.

14.3. The Service Provider shall not transgress any rules, codes, policy documents, procedures and safety standards of UWC, which are available on request and of which the Service Provider must take notice.

14.4. Should UWC at any time believe that any member of the Service Provider’s personnel is failing to comply with any such procedures or policies, UWC shall be entitled to deny such staff member access to the relevant premises and require Service Provider to replace such person without delay.

14.5. The Service Provider shall keep safe any furniture and/or equipment and maintain and clean office, storage- and/or any change room facilities allocated by UWC to the Service Provider, in order to perform its duties.

14.6. The Service Provider and its staff shall not remove any property of UWC, or that of its employees, or its students from the premises of UWC without the written consent of UWC first being obtained.

14.7. The Service Provider and its staff shall abide by the security arrangements of UWC which may include any one or a combination of the following:-

14.7.1. body search;

14.7.2. presentation of personal identification documents or ID cards of UWC;

14.7.3. searching of personal bags / handbags /pockets / lockers;

14.7.4. finger printing;

14.7.5. any other lawful measure that may be required by the site concerned;

14.7.6. to hand in any lost item found to Campus Protection Services of UWC.

[P07, 14; physical PDF pages 8, 9]

23. Compliance with Occupational Health and Safety

23.1. The Service Provider:-

23.1.1. warrants that it is fully aware of the terms and conditions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;

23.1.2. acknowledges that it is an employer in its own right with duties and responsibilities as prescribed in the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;

23.1.3. agrees to ensure that all Works/ Services shall be performed and all equipment shall be used in accordance with the provisions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended,

23.1.4. accepts accountability for its employees and sub-contractors to the extent that such employees and sub-contractors (including any other personnel) contravene the provisions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;

23.1.5. agrees to comply with all rules and regulations implemented by or on behalf of UWC on all sites relating to health and safety and will inform UWC immediately should Service Provider for any reason be unable to comply with the provisions of the OHS Act and such rules and regulations;

23.1.6. shall appoint a duly authorised representative to ensure the discharge of its duties in terms of Section 16(1) and (2) of the OHS Act for the term of the SLA;

23.1.7. shall ensure that all workers are familiar with UWC’s emergency evacuation program and that the correct emergency procedures will be followed in the event of an emergency situation or when an exercise is held.

23.2. In terms of Section 37(2) of the OHS Act, the following is hereby agreed:

23.2.1. the Service Provider shall be responsible for the implementation of the terms and provisions of the OHS Act and Regulations as amended in the area where the work/service is to be undertaken for UWC.

23.3. The Service Provider shall be responsible for the wellbeing, in relation to health and safety of all persons coming into such area in accordance with the OHS Act, subject to any directives issued by management of UWC. The Service Provider undertake to report to the Risk and Compliance Director of UWC any hazard to health and safety which exists or arises during the contract works or services in the area concerned, and over which the Service Provider has no control. The Service Provider shall issue all appropriate safety/health equipment to all persons working or coming into the area. The Service Provider furthermore agrees to specifically abide by and implement the provisions contained in UWC Safety Policy and the OHS Act.

23.4. In the event that any Regulations or State of Disaster and/or UWC Policy regarding any Pandemic be implemented, the Service Provider accepts and undertakes to strictly comply with the protocols and procedures of UWC and indemnify and holds UWC harmless against any claim flowing from any infection and/or in the event that any person, client, employee, agent, manager, or subcontractor fails to comply with any aspect of the National and/or UWC Covid-19 protocols and procedures.

[P07, 23; physical PDF pages 13, 14]

26. Gender Based Violence

26.1 Adherence to the Highest Ethical Standards

The Parties commit themselves to behaviour of the highest ethical standards of integrity, honesty, respect and responsible behaviour in their engagement at this institution.

26.2 Human dignity

The Parties accept that everyone has inherent dignity and has the right to have their dignity respected and protected as set out in the Bill of Rights of the South African Constitution.

26.3 Compliance with the Rules, Regulations and Policies of the Institution

26.3.1 The Parties commit themselves to familiarising themselves with all policies, rules, regulations and stipulations that concern them. In particular, the Parties take special note of the GBV policies, guidelines and protocols.

26.4 Respect for others

The Parties are committed to treating all persons fairly and with respect, to not engage in harassment or discrimination, bullying or aggression and to avoid injuring others. This requires people to:

• Treat all persons fairly and with respect and to not engage in discrimination based on characteristics such as race, religion, gender, disability, age, national origins, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.

• Not engage in harassment of any kind, including sexual or gender harassment or bullying behaviour.

• Avoid injuring others, their property, reputation, study or employment by false or malicious actions, rumours or any other verbal or physical abuse.

26.5 The Parties agree to abide by:

26.5.1 The Policy Framework to Address Gender-based Violence in the Post-School Education and Training System (DHET);

26.5.2 The National Strategic Plan on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide (2020);

26.5.3 Implementation Procedural Guidelines on Sexual and Gender Related Misconduct in Post Schooling (Higher Health) dated 23 August 2021;

26.5.4 Implementation Protocol on Code of Ethics (Higher Health) dated 23 August 2021;

26.5.5 Implementation Protocol on Rape and Sexual Assault Cases (Higher Health) dated 23 August 2021; and

26.5.6 The University of the Western Cape Sexual Violence Policy (C2018/4) dated 1 July 2018.

26.6 UWC expects all service providers, contractors, consultants, partners and other critical stakeholders working within the institution to uphold best practice on protection and safeguarding in regard to sexual and gender related misconduct in conducting all their activities within the campus community.

26.7 All service providers, contractors, consultants and partners working with UWC will be required to accept and commit themselves to the institution’s guidelines on sexual and gender related misconduct and code of ethics.

26.8 Any failure to abide by the guidelines on sexual and gender related misconduct will constitute a breach of contract and UWC reserves the right to immediately cancel the agreement upon occurrence of such a breach.

26.9 The Company is required to institute disciplinary action against any person (on their staff or on contract) who has allegedly violated the guidelines, once informed by UWC that such allegations have been made.

26.10 The Company is required to immediately report any incident that may be perceived as a violation of any of the Policies set out herein above. Failure to report any such violation will constitute a breach of contract and UWC reserves the right to immediately cancel the Agreement upon occurrence of such a breach.

[P07, 26; physical PDF pages 15, 16, 17]

 

Open/download the complete Annexure B General Terms and Conditions and Operational Requirements (PDF)

Back to the overview

Policy scope for suppliers, equipment, stationery and building contracts

The Procurement Policy covers goods and services and places monitoring responsibilities with the purchasing department. Its infrastructure addendum identifies waste reduction among the reasons for early contractor involvement. The full procurement provisions and supplier terms retain their scope and conditions. [P03] [P07]

Back to the overview

Waste measurement and public reporting

Proportion of recycled waste; Publication of sustainability report

Measuring waste generated and recycled

A master's thesis dated November 2025 reports a physical waste audit undertaken over six weeks in September–November 2024 at Chris Hani and Basil February residences. It measured 1,141.07 kg of sampled material and documented composition, collection and separation practices. The complete account retains the sampling design, later survey dates and the distinction between measured samples and final recovery or disposal destinations. [I01]

Evidence and context

Understanding waste in UWC residences

A master’s thesis dated November 2025 by Lisakhanya Nqaba examines the materials discarded in UWC residences and the people whose everyday decisions shape waste management. The research combines a review of higher-education waste studies, a physical waste audit and the views of students and staff. Its value lies in bringing measured waste samples together with practical questions about facilities, separation and participation. The audit concerns Chris Hani and Basil February residences; it is a focused research study rather than a university-wide waste inventory. [I01, Title page; abstract; sections 1.1.6, 3.2 and 4.2]

The audit was undertaken over six weeks in September–November 2024. Following a preliminary exercise in April, the researcher selected 10% of the bins in each of the two residences and sorted material into 25 categories informed by Western Cape waste-characterisation guidance. Collection and measurement took place on four days per week. A team of three weighed and sorted the samples, using protective equipment and recording results by residence. This sampling design provides a detailed view of the collected material; it does not mean that all waste from either residence, every UWC residence or all university operations was measured. [I01, Sections 3.2.1–3.2.4; Table 3.1; chapter 5]

The study reports 1,141.07 kg of sampled waste across the audit. Organic material was the largest stream by mass, reported at 660.13 kg, or approximately 58% of the measured total. Plastics followed at 157.09 kg, with paper and board at 151 kg. The range of categories also included glass, metals, sanitary material, textiles and a small amount of electronic waste. These findings identify the composition of the audit samples. They do not establish the amount ultimately recycled, treated or landfilled. [I01, Section 3.3.1; Tables 3.1 and 3.3; section 3.6]

Food was especially important within the organic stream. The study separately records 471.86 kg of avoidable food waste, 187 kg of unavoidable food waste and 1.27 kg of garden material. Avoidable waste refers to food that could have been eaten but was discarded; unavoidable waste includes parts such as peels and eggshells. Keeping these categories separate helps clarify the different opportunities for prevention and treatment. The results concern self-catering residences and cannot be used as a measurement of waste from UWC’s catering outlets or as an annual food-waste total. [I01, PDF p68 (definitions), p71 (masses), p81 (Table 3.3), p21 (self-catering scope)]

The audit also draws attention to variation over time and between residences. Waste collected on Mondays was generally higher, which the researcher linked to the accumulation of weekend material when cleaners did not collect on Sundays. Kitchen arrangements differed between the two residences, and students and workers described changes around assessment periods, payments and moving into or out of residences. These are useful questions for future measurement. The study’s limited sites and sampling period do not establish a complete seasonal pattern or prove a single cause of waste generation. [I01, Sections 1.1.6, 3.3, 3.4.2 and 4.3.5]

Sorting facilities and everyday practice

Nqaba describes a two-bin approach using green bins for recyclable material and yellow bins for non-recyclable material, alongside black bins and, in some offices and laboratories, separate paper containers. The residence observations show why the location of those facilities matters. Some blocks had the coloured bins outside but only black bins inside. The arrangements were not identical in Chris Hani and Basil February residences. The thesis therefore records both the presence of sorting infrastructure and practical inconsistencies that could make separation harder at the point where waste is generated. [I01, Section 1.1.6; section 3.5.3; section 4.3.6; Figure 4.1]

The operational account describes cleaners collecting residence waste in the mornings from Monday to Saturday and transporting it to skips near the contractors’ gate for collection by waste trucks. It also describes separate collection of sanitary-bin waste. However, sanitary material was found mixed with ordinary waste during the preliminary audit and was therefore retained as an audit category. This is a specific observation about the study setting. It cannot establish compliance across every UWC laboratory, clinic, residence or waste stream. [I01, Solid Waste Management Structure in UWC Residences]

Between November 2024 and April 2025, the researcher gathered 63 online questionnaire responses and conducted interviews with 18 students and eight staff members. The staff group included four cleaners, three residence managers and a member of the university function responsible for waste management. The questionnaire used convenience sampling and the interviews added depth after limited survey participation. Respondents came from a wider range of residences than the two physically audited sites, so the survey and measured waste should not be treated as a matched sample. [I01, Sections 4.2.2–4.2.4 and 4.3.1]

Many respondents recognised the different bins and were satisfied with their accessibility, but knowledge did not consistently translate into sorting. Almost seven in ten survey respondents said they knew about waste-management practices, while roughly half said they separated waste only sometimes. Respondents also reported infrequent exposure to educational material and described uncertainty about particular items, unclear signs in some locations, time pressures and reluctance to handle dirty waste. These are findings from the participating students rather than a representative estimate for all UWC students. [I01, Table 4.1; sections 4.3.3–4.3.6]

The statistical findings were mixed. Most tested links between awareness and practice were not statistically significant, but some were, including relationships involving familiarity with separation standards or bin signs and self-reported sorting. The study therefore supports attention to clear, convenient facilities as well as education and motivation. Its cross-sectional, self-reported data do not demonstrate that a particular campaign caused better sorting or that one intervention will work throughout the University. [I01, Sections 4.3.3–4.3.4]

Back to the overview

Publication of sustainability reporting

UWC's public annual reports include Council Statements on Transformation and Sustainability. The full account distinguishes reporting years from approval and publication dates: the 2024 report's statement was approved in June 2025, while the 2025 report was finalised in 2026. The RISE 2024/2025 report offers a complementary, dated research account. [B13] [B14] [B15]

Evidence and context

Public reporting and accountability

UWC published its 2023 Annual Report through an official notice dated 31 July 2024. The report’s Council Statement on Transformation and Sustainability, approved on 25 June 2024, includes natural-resource stewardship, campus biodiversity, sustainable infrastructure and ethical commercial practice. This provides a sustainability-containing institutional report made public during 2024, while its reporting year remains 2023. [B26, Council statement, printed pp52–55; natural environment and approval, p54] [B27, Posted-on date and report notice]

The earlier 2022 Annual Report contains a corresponding sustainability statement, approved on 22 June 2023 and publicly announced that October. Its discussion includes natural resources and the Cape Flats Nature Reserve alongside the wider social and institutional dimensions of sustainability. The public Finance archive lists consecutive annual reports. These reports integrate sustainability into a recurring public account of institutional governance, academic work and resource stewardship. [B28, Council statement, printed pp42–44] [B29, Posted-on date] [B30, Annual-report archive]

UWC’s Annual Report 2024 contains a Council Statement on Transformation and Sustainability, approved on 26 June 2025. It considers sustainability across students’ experience, the workplace, teaching and research, infrastructure, the natural environment, finances and governance. Its natural-environment commitments include sustainable approaches to resources through institutional practices and academic work, alongside protection of campus biodiversity. This is publicly listed institutional reporting for the 2024 year, with sustainability embedded in the wider annual report. [B13, Council Statement on Transformation and Sustainability: supplied 152-page edition pp52–54; current 130-page public edition printed pp46–49 / PDF pp48–51]

The signed Annual Report 2025 continues this reporting approach. Its Council Statement on Transformation and Sustainability appears on printed pages 47–50 and was approved on 24 June 2026. It describes responsible management of natural resources, infrastructure maintenance, ethical commercial practice and institutional oversight. The report concerns the 2025 year but was finalised in 2026, and the statement refers to the subsequent 2026–2030 Institutional Operating Plan. Those dates matter when distinguishing reporting on 2025 from decisions taken during that year. [B14, Council Statement on Transformation and Sustainability, printed pp47–50]

The Research and Innovation RISE Annual Report 2024/2025, publicly released in December 2025, provides a complementary account of research capacity and engagement. Its food-security section links work on local governance, community partnerships and food systems with SDG 12, among other goals. The activities and output figures in that section principally concern 2024. The report therefore supports an account of the research foundation and its public dissemination while keeping activity years visible. [B15, Food-security section, printed pp30–33]

Back to the overview

Further contributions and context

A history of student participation and environmental learning

UWC’s waste-related engagement has a longer history. On 27 April 2013, its Green Campus Initiative brought students, staff and service providers together for a campus clean-up and recycling drive. Participants collected litter, emptied bins and separated materials, learning how the campus recycling system worked and how to distinguish recyclable from non-recyclable items. The account names cleaning-service representatives and the Central House Committee among the participants. This records direct participation in environmental learning at that time, rather than evidence that the same event or contractual arrangements continued in 2025. [I02, Article, page 1; opening four paragraphs]

The clean-up formed part of a wider Green Week programme. A residence discussion on 26 April addressed sustainability, energy and water use, and a service held in darkness on 28 April used a familiar community setting to encourage energy saving. The article also listed further planned activities, including talks, tree planting, exhibitions, debates and a green fashion show. The completed activities and the remaining programme should be distinguished: the announcement is not confirmation that every planned event took place. [I02, Article, pages 1–2; Green Talk, Green/Dark service and remaining programme]

The 2018 Student Guide gave practical instructions for the two-bin system: green lids identified dry recyclables, while yellow lids identified wet food, organic material and other non-recyclables. It also described separate paper-recycling containers. This earlier guidance helps explain the system later observed in the residence study. Its date matters: the guide records the arrangement communicated to students in 2018 and is not, by itself, a current service specification. [I05, Environmental footprint of UWC]

In March 2019, UWC welcomed South Africa’s Good Green Deeds programme and linked waste prevention and recycling to environmental health, livelihoods and enterprise development. Its account described Green Campus Initiative volunteers taking part in clean-ups, residence gardening, talks and awareness activities. It also highlighted research on recovering value from coal fly ash and treating acid mine drainage. The story connects everyday behaviour with research and the social conditions surrounding waste. It is a historical account, not a new 2025 commitment or a measurement of present-day waste recovery. [I03, Article, pages 1–3]

An Earth Day overview published on 22 April 2021 brought these strands together through environmental law, cleaner technology, food and land systems, waste research and campus participation. It recorded UWC’s longstanding association with the Talloires Declaration, support for Good Green Deeds, and work on waste prevention, recycling and a secondary-resources economy. Its campus examples included student clean-ups and environmental discussions as well as conservation work. Together, these sources show a continuing history of concern with responsible resource use, while the specific dates prevent historical participation claims from being mistaken for verified 2025 results. [I04, Article, Green Justice, Green Systems and A Green Model]

Research that connects waste, livelihoods and communities

UWC’s Waste and Society research programme connects environmental questions with livelihoods, social behaviour and entrepreneurship. Professor Catherina Schenck’s SARChI Chair was launched in August 2018 with a focus on opportunities in waste value chains, behaviour change and research capacity. Separately, the 2025 Annual Report lists Waste and Society among UWC’s SARChI Chairs, providing a dated institutional reference for the research and partnerships described here. [B17, Chair launch and research priorities] [B14, SARChI Chairs, printed p33]

A 2025 paper by Chitaka, Schenck and Petersen examines the place of informal e-waste workers in a circular economy. Research across ten South African towns and cities considers collection, dismantling, repair, refurbishment and pre-processing. It finds that more intensive processing can increase sale prices while exposing workers to hazards, without necessarily producing adequate incomes. The authors use Korten’s development framework to propose support that combines immediate assistance, capacity development, structural reform and collective organisation. The paper was published in 2025, drawing on fieldwork conducted from May to November 2021, during COVID-19 restrictions. [B03, Abstract and methods; development framework]

Community collection pilots and national collaboration

UWC’s March 2025 account of research in Langa describes two disposable-diaper collection pilots operating since 2023. Families could leave used diapers at early-childhood-development centres or use door-to-door collection by mobile cart. The work showed that households would separate this waste when practical disposal options were available. UWC researchers worked with GreenEdge and ETH Zurich collaborators, and hosted Kimberly-Clark sustainability and research representatives. Communication and community participation supported the pilots; continuing finance and wider implementation remained challenges. [B19, Article body]

On 20 November 2025, UWC hosted the launch of the Absorbent Hygiene Products Waste Forum. Professor Schenck and Dr Marc Kalina co-chaired its interim committee. Government departments, producers, retailers, NGOs and community representatives took part, with Kimberly-Clark funding the meeting. The forum set an agenda to support existing collection projects and assist the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment with developing a national strategy. This extends research dialogue around difficult waste streams, including diapers and sanitary products, while the strategy-development and implementation work remained ahead. [B01, Article body]

Designing better systems for beverage packaging

UWC and Eunomia’s October 2024 study investigated a proposed mandatory deposit-return system for South African beverage packaging. The team combined market analysis with interviews and workshops involving waste reclaimers, and surveys of buy-back centres, informal retailers and hospitality businesses. The modelling assumed collection of about 90% and used a R1 refundable deposit; the report notes that R2 might be needed and that convenient return points are essential. The study also highlighted uncertainties requiring practical trials and careful system design. These are projected national-system benefits, rather than recycling rates achieved by UWC. The research offers an explicitly dated foundation for considering how packaging recovery can include informal workers. [B05, Executive summary; model assumptions and deposit level, printed pp25, 56 / PDF pp36, 67] [B31, Survey methods and results]

Recovering value from batteries and solar equipment

A 2025 UWC-linked study of solar photovoltaic modules examines how equipment can remain useful beyond its first ownership cycle. Interviews and a sector survey, conducted from November 2023 to March 2024, informed a framework for reuse in South Africa. The authors identify product testing, quality assurance and effective use of producer-responsibility arrangements as enablers. They also highlight market demand, standards and trade-offs between reuse, design and recycling. The work contributes evidence for a circular solar supply chain; it does not report a campus-wide reuse scheme. [B04, Abstract and methods]

UWC’s South African Institute for Advanced Materials Chemistry and Cape Peninsula University of Technology collaborators published a battery-recycling study in October 2025. The team recovered electrolyte solvents from spent cells through controlled low-temperature vacuum distillation. The experiment recovered 84% of the principal solvents after 300 minutes at 110°C and 80 mbar. Recovering this fraction before metal processing addresses a component that can otherwise be lost or released during pre-treatment. The result is a laboratory recovery finding, with the stated conditions, rather than an institutional recycling rate. [B10, Abstract and experimental study]

Experimental apparatus used for electrolyte-solvent recovery from spent lithium-ion cells, Figure 1 in Tawonezvi et al. (2025). Original embedded figure, unchanged. Credit: T. Tawonezvi, A. Sinto, D. Zide, M. Nomnqa and B. J. Bladergroen (2025), Chemical Engineering Journal Advances 24, 100896, Figure 1, CC BY 4.0. Image source. CC BY 4.0.

An earlier UWC briefing, dated May 2024, describes research into recovering metals from lithium-ion battery waste using functionalised PET nanofibres, electrowinning and precipitation. Laboratory work explored selective adsorption and recovery of nickel–cobalt alloys and other compounds. The study contributes to a semi-closed-loop recycling approach in which recovered materials could serve further manufacturing uses. It provides an earlier research foundation for circular battery processing; the briefing does not establish a commercial recycling facility. [B21, Key findings, main results and process overview]

Reducing food losses and finding uses for organic waste

A 2025 profile of Dr Arina Hitzeroth in UWC’s Department of Biotechnology describes research into food-spoilage organisms. Her work focuses on Chryseobacterium and its interactions with other organisms, including those able to grow in cold conditions. With National Research Foundation support and student participation, the research seeks better understanding of microbial behaviour that could inform strategies to keep food fresh for longer. Its contribution to responsible consumption lies in food-loss prevention research and researcher development; the profile reports neither a deployed preservation technology nor a measured reduction in food waste. [B09, Article, both pages]

Dr Arina Hitzeroth, featured in UWC’s August 2025 food-spoilage research profile. Credit: UWC; photographer not confirmed in source. Image source.

Kagiso Elton Mpa’s 2024 UWC master’s thesis examines adoption of digital technologies in retail supply chains with food-waste reduction as its focus. A survey-based model considers technological, organisational and environmental factors. The findings identify compatibility, complexity, costs, organisational size, expertise and competitive pressure as relevant to adoption and use. This work adds evidence about the conditions needed to improve supply-chain information and decision-making, without claiming a measured reduction in retail or campus waste. [B06, Abstract]

A University of Missouri–UWC collaboration undertook food-loss research visits from 5 to 13 June 2024 in Philippi, Khayelitsha and Riversonderend. UWC co-investigators Osden Jokonya and Frederic Isingizwe worked with Temidayo Akenroye to explore smallholder farming, preservation and data practices. The exchange report identifies constraints involving cold chains, logistics, market access and manual record-keeping. It proposes further research and a collaborative, affordable data-use framework. These initial observations are a 2024 foundation, rather than demonstrated reductions delivered in 2025. [B25, Site visits, findings and future work]

UWC and Stellenbosch University researchers also investigated converting starch-rich food waste into bioethanol. A March 2024 briefing reports laboratory work with pre-consumer and restaurant food-waste mixtures, comparing treatment and fermentation approaches. An enzyme-producing yeast reduced the amount of added starch-degrading enzymes required. The work also tested antimicrobial strategies, with partial effects and unresolved challenges in controlling a broad range of contaminants. The study demonstrates research into organic-waste valorisation while keeping the distinction between laboratory feasibility and an operating waste-treatment service. [B23, Key findings, main results and limitations]

Waste-derived materials and greener manufacturing research

In February 2025, UWC chemists Tapiwa Hlatywayo and Leslie Petrik, with Benoit Louis of the University of Strasbourg, published research using coal fly ash and acid mine drainage to prepare iron-containing zeolite catalysts. The study tested their performance in a model chemical reaction and examined how different preparation methods and metal components influenced activity. It identifies a possible route for turning two difficult industrial waste streams into useful catalytic materials. This is laboratory research into beneficiation, with industrial-scale use still requiring further evidence. [B12, Abstract, affiliation and results]

A 2025 review by Robyn Lesch, Evan David Visser, Ntalane Sello Seroka and Lindiwe Khotseng examines carbon nanomaterials made from biomass, including agricultural residues and food by-products. It considers preparation methods, material properties and potential uses in energy storage and catalysis, while identifying challenges in process optimisation and scaling. Published online in June and in its journal issue in October 2025, the review develops a research agenda for renewable feedstocks and circular material use. [B24, Abstract, publication history and conclusions]

Lesch’s earlier postgraduate research received second place in the Green Youth Indaba Young Researchers Pitching Competition in June 2024. Her pitch explored agricultural waste as a starting material for graphene-like structures. The recognition illustrates a route through which postgraduate research on waste-derived materials can reach wider innovation audiences. [B22, Article body]

UWC’s Technology Transfer Office also highlighted Leslie Petrik’s coal-fly-ash geopolymer concrete in an August 2025 innovation listing. The listing presents a further waste-to-materials research example; it does not establish the extent of commercial use or verified construction performance. [B11, Official news index entry dated 29 August 2025]

Learning about responsible resource use

UWC Library’s programme for South African Library Week, 17–20 March 2025, placed sustainable communities at its centre. Scheduled activities included a sustainable-living webinar, a pledge, a whiteboard campaign and database speed-dating. The programme documents planned opportunities for sustainability awareness and engagement in the University community. [B07, Programme]

In his Library Week opening address, Rector and Vice-Chancellor Professor Robert Balfour linked responsible resource use with the library’s educational role. He described efforts to reduce paper waste and promote digital resources, including the sustainable-living campaign. The address supports the public communication of these practices without providing a measured paper-saving total. [B08, Libraries as Sustainable Community Spaces]

A 2025 UWC graduate profile records that Mastercard Foundation scholar Qawekazi Msesane organised a clean-up and environmental education campaign in Khayelitsha. The activity taught young people about recycling, waste management and water conservation. The profile illustrates student-led community learning; it does not give a separate campaign date or participant count. [B16, Qawekazi Msesane profile]

UWC’s October 2025 notice of the edited book Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development Goals in Africa adds a legal perspective. The volume considers how intellectual property can enable innovation while creating development challenges, with SDG 12 among the goals addressed. Its context-sensitive approach connects responsible production with the legal frameworks governing research, enterprise, agriculture and manufacturing. [B20, Book summary]

Developing a circular water–energy–food demonstrator

UWC’s Green New World project was reported in April 2025 as a developing demonstration site for linked water, energy and food systems. Led by the Energy Storage and Fluid Treatment Centre within SAIAMC, the concept brings together agrivoltaics, water purification, irrigation, cooling, hydroponics and mobility. Site preparation included a 130-metre fence. The report described planned 90 kW solar installation, later hydrogen applications and a proposed 2026 training course; construction remained subject to municipal approval of the submitted plans. These plans illustrate the intended integration of resources and technologies; the source does not establish that the complete system was commissioned in 2025. [B02, Site preparation, proposed phases and conditions]

Site preparation for Green New World, reported April 2025. Photograph: Jesi Townsend/UWC. Credit: Jesi Townsend/UWC. Image source.

References

[P01] University of the Western Cape. Council approval 22 September 2022; implementation 23 September 2022. Infrastructure Management Policy.

[P03] University of the Western Cape. Main amendment 27 March 2025; addendum approved 28 June 2018. Procurement Policy with Infrastructure Framework Addendum.

P05 quotation source: the supplied original scanned edition. The official public PDF is a separately rendered version.

[P06] University of the Western Cape. Council amendment 27 March 2025; initial implementation 2001. Fixed Assets Policy.

[P07] University of the Western Cape. Undated body; filename 20 February 2023; PDF creation 24 February 2023. Annexure B General Terms and Conditions and Operational Requirements.

[P08] University of the Western Cape. Undated institutional service page; accessed 13 October 2026. Business Processing.

[I01] Lisakhanya Nqaba; University of the Western Cape. Thesis dated November 2025; repository public availability 7 July 2026. A comprehensive solid waste audit in UWC residences: awareness, views, and waste management amongst university students and waste workers.

[I02] Institutional Advancement, UWC. Activities 26–28 April 2013; article describes plans through 10 May 2013. Green Week 2013.

[I03] Nicklaus Kruger, UWC. 8 March 2019. Making Africa Green Again: UWC Welcomes SA’s Good Green Deeds Programme.

[I04] Nicklaus Kruger, Institutional Advancement. 22 April 2021. UWC’s Green Revolution: Four Ways We’re Building A Sustainable Future.

[I05] University of the Western Cape. 2018 guide. UWC Student Guide 2018: Environmental footprint of UWC.

[I06] PURCO SA, on behalf of the University of the Western Cape. Tender deadlines July 2016; live page includes a mixed 2026 attachment label. UWC – Waste: PUR 3201/5 (UWC08/2016).

[B01] Harriet Box / UWC Institutional Advancement. 25 November 2025. SA Waste Forum Launches at UWC and Targets Environmental Health Risks of Disposable Nappies.

[B02] Nathan Adams / UWC. 16 April 2025. A Green New World Loading at UWC.

[B03] Takunda Y. Chitaka, Catherina Schenck and Jochen Petersen. 2025; accepted 10 May 2025. Enhancing Circular Economic Activities of e-Waste Pickers in South Africa: Using Korten’s Four Generations Strategies as Framework.

[B04] M. N. Crozier, P. G. Ntsala, C. Schenck, J. Crozier McCleland, E. E. van Dyk and J. Petersen. 17 July 2025 online; accepted 14 April 2025. Drivers, barriers and enablers of a South African circular solar PV module supply chain: A focus on reuse.

[B05] UWC, Eunomia Research & Consulting and Aquila Environmental; core team listed on report p ii. October 2024. Researching a Deposit Return System for South Africa: Costs and Benefits of Implementing a Mandatory Deposit Return System for Beverage Packaging.

[B06] Kagiso Elton Mpa / UWC. June 2024 thesis; repository copyright cover 2025. Factors Influencing the Adoption of Digital Technologies to Reduce Food Waste in Retail Supply Chain.

[B07] UWC Library. 17–20 March 2025. South African Library Week 2025 programme: Libraries for Sustainable Communities.

[B08] Professor Robert J. Balfour / UWC. 17 March 2025. Rector speech: Library Week.

[B09] UWC Institutional Advancement. 20 August 2025. The Science of Food Spoilage with Dr Arina Hitzeroth.

[B10] T. Tawonezvi, A. Sinto, D. Zide, M. Nomnqa and B. J. Bladergroen. 3 October 2025 online. Recovery of organic electrolyte solvents from spent perforated Li-ion cells using a low-temperature vacuum-assisted distillation process.

[B11] UWC Technology Transfer Office. 29 August 2025 listing. Ashes to Architecture: Building the Future with Geopolymer Concrete.

[B12] Tapiwa Hlatywayo, Leslie Petrik and Benoit Louis. 7 February 2025. Coal Fly Ash and Acid Mine Drainage-Based Fe-BEA Catalysts for the Friedel–Crafts Alkylation of Benzene.

[B13] University of the Western Cape. 2024 reporting year; Council statement approved 26 June 2025. UWC Annual Report 2024.

[B14] University of the Western Cape. 2025 reporting year; approved 24 June 2026. UWC Annual Report 2025 (signed).

[B15] Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Innovation / UWC. 9 December 2025 public landing. Research and Innovation RISE Annual Report 2024/2025.

[B16] University of the Western Cape. 10 October 2025. Mastercard Foundation Scholars Celebrate Impactful Journeys at UWC Spring Graduation.

[B17] Nicklaus Kruger / UWC. 20 August 2018. New SARChI Chair Catherina Schenck Rethinks Waste to Improve Society and Empower Entrepreneurs.

[B18] Carmel Roberts / UWC Institutional Advancement. 18 July 2025. The Fix Supports #UDubsCares.

[B19] Harriet Box / UWC. 28 March 2025. UWC’s Innovative Diaper Disposal Pilot Projects in Cape Town Proven Successful.

[B20] D. O. Oriakhogba, C. T. Musiza and S. Mba-Kalu / UWC publication notice. 2 October 2025. Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development Goals in Africa.

[B21] B. J. Bladergroen, L. Petrik, T. Tawonezvi, D. Zide, E. S. M. Massima and M. Tshisano / UWC. May 2024. Metal Recovery from Li-ion Battery Waste.

[B22] Harriet Box / UWC. 5 July 2024. Young Researcher Earns Silver at Varsity Pitching Competition.

[B23] R. den Haan, E. van Rensburg, J. F. Görgens, G. van Lill, J. van Rooyen and K. Trollope / UWC and Stellenbosch University. March 2024. Valuable Products from Organic Wastes: Engineering an Antimicrobial Yeast as Industrial Platform for Non-Sterile Bioprocesses.

[B24] Robyn Lesch, Evan David Visser, Ntalane Sello Seroka and Lindiwe Khotseng. Online 5 June 2025; issue 22 October 2025. Biomass-Derived Carbon-Based Nanomaterials: Current Research, Trends, and Challenges.

[B25] Temidayo Akenroye / University of Missouri System; UWC co-investigators Osden Jokonya and Frederic Isingizwe. 2024 activity report. Reducing Loss and Waste in South Africa’s Agricultural Supply Chains: 2024 Faculty Exchange Report.

[B26] University of the Western Cape. 2023 reporting year; sustainability statement approved 25 June 2024. UWC Annual Report 2023.

[B27] Institutional Advancement / UWC. 31 July 2024. UWC 2023 Annual Report: publication notice.

[B28] University of the Western Cape. 2022 reporting year; sustainability statement approved 22 June 2023. UWC Annual Report 2022.

[B29] Institutional Advancement / UWC. 16 October 2023. UWC Annual Report 2022: publication notice.

[B30] University of the Western Cape. Undated live index, checked 13 October 2026. Annual Reports: Finance public archive.

[B31] UWC, Eunomia Research & Consulting and Aquila Environmental; project team on p2. October 2024. Supplementary Report: Waste Reclaimer and Buy-Back Centre Surveys — Researching a Deposit Return System for South Africa.