SDG 13: Climate Action | 2025
Campus energy measurement
The energy programme, proposed metering and the distinction between development milestones and measured low-carbon use.
Climate education and adaptation
Local learning, climate plans, government-linked risk work and NGO partnerships for adaptation.
Carbon-neutral commitment
The dated institutional carbon-reduction context, with its stated aims and development stages.
SDG icon: United Nations. UN logo and icon guidelines (PDF).
The content of this publication has not been approved by the United Nations and does not reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States.
UWC connects climate knowledge with community resilience, public dialogue and changes to its own infrastructure. Its 2025 work brought together health professionals, community leaders, researchers, artists and government partners, alongside longer-term commitments to resource-efficient infrastructure and environmental stewardship.
Campus energy measurement
Low carbon energy use
Measuring low-carbon energy use across the University
UWC's July 2025 Energy Security Solution MOU includes advanced metering and measurement alongside solar generation, battery storage and analytics. The earlier tender specified online energy metering and load monitoring. The complete account retains these development and procurement milestones, including the differing annual-report chronology, without treating proposed capacity as measured generation. [C04] [C03] [C06]
Evidence and context
A lower-carbon energy programme: procurement and the 2025 agreement
UWC’s October 2024 public tender specified a 4 MWp photovoltaic system with battery storage serving main-campus residences and academic buildings, Unibell residence and the Chemical Science car park. The tender included online energy metering, load monitoring, operational support and technology replacement or upgrading over the service period. It sought Build, Operate and Transfer proposals, with an operations-and-maintenance period capped at 20 years from the infrastructure completion certificate. The capacity was a procurement specification, not a commissioned generation figure. [C03, Published 4 October 2024; Services Rendered and Contract Duration]
On 7 July 2025, UWC announced an MOU for an integrated Energy Security Solution. Its four components were solar photovoltaic panels, advanced metering and measurement, battery energy storage and a business-intelligence layer supporting analytics and operational efficiency. The stated aims were to reduce the carbon footprint, improve electricity resilience and support clean-energy priorities. The announcement placed the project within a Roadmap to Clean Energy Security that also included energy-conscious infrastructure, awareness campaigns, rechargeable lighting, battery packs and generator support during outages. [C04, Published 7 July 2025]
The annual reports retain an important chronology. The 2024 report describes an initiated tender process and an award at the time of reporting, with the contract not finalised. The later signed report for 2025 dates the award to early 2026. The MOU is therefore a substantive 2025 development milestone; the announcement does not establish a commissioning date or measured carbon savings. [C06, Printed pp.19–20, 57 / physical pp.21–22, 59] [C02, Physical/printed p.27]

UWC’s clean-energy MOU announcement, published in July 2025. The announcement marks a development agreement; it does not establish commissioned renewable generation. Credit: University of the Western Cape; individual photographer not stated. Image source.
Climate education and adaptation
Environmental education measures
Local climate-risk education and campaigns
UWC's 2025 community workshop connected children's rights and local climate pressures, while its School of Public Health and the Western Cape Government offered a climate-health course confirmed as delivered in November. The full evidence also retains climate-law learning, energy-awareness campaigns, public arts and water-risk discussions, with each programme's audience, date and status. [E02] [E05] [E06]
Evidence and context
Energy awareness through everyday choices
UWC’s #TurnItOff campaign, published on 7 March 2024, encouraged students and staff to switch off unused lights, computers, monitors and printers, avoid unnecessary standby power and turn off air conditioning when leaving a room. It also advised against using air conditioning during load shedding. The campaign connected practical action on campus and at home with messages from University leadership. [C08, Published 7 March 2024]
The Power the Change competition invited registered UWC students to communicate energy-saving ideas through short TikTok or YouTube videos in 2025. The call opened in July, closed on 15 August and scheduled the winners’ announcement for 1 September. Selected videos were intended to support the University’s awareness campaign. The public call documents a student-facing engagement opportunity; it does not itself provide participation totals or verified energy savings. [C09, Published 15 July 2025]
Learning with communities about climate and children’s rights
Climate education at UWC connects environmental change with rights, livelihoods and the needs of communities. The Dullah Omar Institute’s 2024 report records a community-leaders training workshop held at UWC’s Chemical Sciences Building on 13 November 2024. Its programme considered children’s rights in relation to climate change and business practices, with Akot Makur Chuot presenting on climate and children’s rights. The same report places climate questions within the Children’s Rights Project’s wider teaching and knowledge-sharing work, including postgraduate engagement. The workshop provides an earlier foundation for the community-facing work continued in 2025. [E01, Annual Report 2024, printed pp. 21–22, 30, 32 and 45]
That community-facing approach continued in 2025. A conversational workshop held at UWC on 11 August 2025 and organised by the Institute’s Children’s Rights Project brought together community and religious leaders, early childhood development teachers and grassroots activists. Participants explored how climate pressures affect children and how local leadership can make space for children and young adults to contribute to solutions. The discussion considered classroom heat and cold, safe places to play and the importance of listening to young people. Participants called for a stronger child-rights perspective in local climate governance and intergenerational support for youth advocacy. Reported in August, the workshop was part of the African children’s-rights work supported by Sweden’s development-cooperation agency. Its contribution was to awareness, dialogue and local capacity; the public account does not report a resulting municipal policy or quantify reductions in climate risk. [E02, Article body / identified programme section] [D01, 2025 activities, printed pp. 17 and 58]

Community leaders at UWC’s 2025 workshop on children’s rights and climate change. Credit: Supplied / University of the Western Cape. Image source.
The Institute also connected local concerns with regional deliberation. At its 2025 SADC-focused seminar, government officials, civil-society organisations, researchers, regional representatives and young people considered how climate law, national commitments, finance and responses to loss and damage could better account for children. Participants highlighted the differing needs of children in vulnerable circumstances, including children with disabilities. UWC’s post-event account records agreement to develop action points and the appointment of a steering group to follow them through. These are practical next steps for collaboration, while their later implementation should be assessed separately. [E03, Article body / identified programme section]
The SADC Parliamentary Forum independently identifies the seminar dates as 2–4 July 2025 and the venue as UWC’s School of Public Health. Its account names the Dullah Omar Institute’s Children’s Rights Project as organiser and situates the meeting at the intersection of child rights, environmental law and climate justice. This regional partnership widened the audience for climate education beyond the university and created a shared setting for public institutions and civil society to examine child-responsive action. [E04, Article body / identified programme section]
The Institute also helped convene African Perspectives on International Climate Change Law, a hybrid symposium held in Cape Town on 7–8 April 2025. Its Children’s Rights Project co-hosted the event with the Centre for International Law and Policy in Africa and Harvard Law School’s Human Rights Program, in collaboration with UWC’s Global Environmental Law Centre and the Centre for International Law at the National University of Singapore. The symposium brought scholars, practitioners, policymakers and civil-society participants together to consider African perspectives on international climate law. [D01, 2025 report, printed pp. 16–17]
Preparing health professionals for climate risks
UWC’s School of Public Health and the Western Cape Government jointly offered a practical short course linking climate change with frontline health work. The 2025 programme was designed for environmental health practitioners, air-quality officers, nurses, allied health workers, NGO staff working with communities and interested UWC students. Its planned structure combined three classroom days with two days of visits to monitoring and innovation sites near Cape Town. Convened by Martina Lembani and Solange Mianda, the course, accredited for continuing professional development by the HPCSA, covered health effects, air pollution, vulnerability, mitigation and adaptation, and the roles of health workers and authorities. Its aim was to help participants recognise climate-related risks and advocate for action in their institutions and communities. [E05, Article body / identified programme section]
A separate account from the South African Medical Research Council confirms that the inaugural course took place from 24 to 28 November 2025. The Council reports more than 30 participants engaging in lecture sessions and two field visits. Caradee Wright taught on 24 and 25 November, addressing the links between climate and health, the health effects of climate manifestations, and risk and vulnerability. The participation figure is the Council’s reported course attendance, rather than a measured change in health outcomes or community resilience. [E06, Article body / identified programme section]
UWC expertise also contributed to evaluating climate-health education across Africa. Woldekidan Amde, affiliated with UWC’s School of Public Health and the Association of Schools of Public Health in Africa, coauthored a 2025 evaluation of the Africa Climate and Health Responder Course. The course itself ran online from 17 September to 22 October 2024. Developed through a regional partnership with Columbia University’s Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education, Africa CDC, WHO AFRO, Project ECHO and other organisations, it combined expert teaching, African case studies and live discussion. Participation was free, with English delivery and simultaneous French and Portuguese interpretation.
The evaluation distinguishes 7,572 registrants from 3,500 people who attended at least one session and a 1,657-person final-survey group. Participants included government, NGO, academic and private-sector professionals. Survey respondents reported stronger awareness, communication confidence and preparedness to support adaptation and more resilient health systems. These findings support accessible, multilingual professional education as a promising route to capacity building. They do not demonstrate that all registrants completed the course, that UWC trained the entire cohort alone, or that the programme produced measured changes in clinical practice. The authors identify self-report and participant selection as limitations. Planned longer-term follow-up and train-the-trainer work are distinct from the results already reported. [E07, Affiliations; abstract; sections 2.1–2.5, 3, 4.1, 5; CC BY 4.0]

Surveyed awareness before and after the Africa climate-health responder course: 2024 course data reported in 2025. This figure reports self-assessed awareness, not clinical or patient outcomes. Credit: Magalhães et al. (2025), Frontiers in Public Health 13:1617723, Figure 2, CC BY 4.0; unchanged figure. Image source. CC BY 4.0.
Developing climate-law knowledge and public understanding
Formal study provides another route into climate action. UWC’s 2025 Climate Law and Governance module is a 30-credit, NQF Level 9 offering within the LLM in Environment Law. Its curriculum brings climate science together with legal and governance questions in South African, regional and international settings. Students are expected to examine mitigation and adaptation, the relationship between climate rights and climate justice, the responsibilities of different public institutions, and the potential of litigation. The module also asks students to analyse environmental legislation and apply legal reasoning to practical situations. This is evidence of a specialised postgraduate learning opportunity; it does not make climate education compulsory for every UWC student. [E08, Faculty of Law 2025 calendar, Climate Law and Governance 818, printed pp. 229–231]
The academic programme record also lists Climate Law and Governance as a 30-credit second-semester module in the 2024 LLM Environment Law stream. This provides a dated point of continuity for specialised climate teaching before 2025. [E09, Article body / identified programme section]
Beyond degree teaching, UWC convened a discussion with alumni and the business community in Gauteng on 29 August 2024. Angela van der Berg, Director of the Global Environmental Law Centre, explained South Africa’s newly enacted climate framework, while an alumni moderator and panellists from finance and a community water initiative brought professional and social perspectives. The discussion considered alignment of public policy, adaptation informed by risk assessment, emissions reduction and the importance of implementation for vulnerable communities. Organised by Institutional Advancement, it translated legal change into a setting where participants could consider its practical implications. The event is a public-education contribution, not evidence that the university adopted the national framework as its own institutional climate plan. [E10, Article body / identified programme section]
Sharing climate knowledge across disciplines and borders
UWC hosted the 16th SANORD International Conference from 4 to 6 December 2024. Environmental justice and climate action featured among the conference themes, bringing these questions into a wider exchange on knowledge, equity and sustainable futures. The official programme overview records the event dates, while UWC’s post-conference account confirms that the gathering took place. [E11, Official conference programme overview, 4–6 December 2024] [E12, post-conference account]
UWC’s post-conference report records more than 330 delegates at SANORD 2024. It describes workshops, panels, roundtables and presentations addressing the relationship between knowledge, equity and sustainable futures. Climate action and environmental justice formed part of those exchanges. The value of the event for SDG 13 lies in bringing people and disciplines together to share evidence, interrogate whose knowledge informs decisions and develop further collaboration. The attendance total covers the conference as a whole, across its different themes. [E12, Article body / identified programme section]
Research Week provided an additional campus platform in 2024. Held from 16 to 19 September, it included a stream on net-zero transformation and environmental sustainability, covering carbon neutrality, climate sustainability, deforestation, water contamination, ocean acidification and related innovation. The programme placed these themes alongside health, human rights, governance and other areas of research. Such exchanges help make connections between specialised work and broader societal challenges. [E13, Article body / identified programme section]
The 2025 Research Week, held from 8 to 10 September, continued this emphasis on collaboration. UWC’s retrospective describes researchers, students and partners engaging with themes spanning health innovation, sustainability, technology and social transformation, with climate change among the national priorities addressed. The event offered a forum for bringing work across disciplinary boundaries into conversation. Its documented contribution is research communication and exchange; no separate climate-course completion total is reported. [E14, Article body / identified programme section]
Student learning also extended beyond UWC. The Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor for Research and Innovation supported three students to attend the July 2024 EnergyWaterFoodClimate Nexus Summit in Durban, organised by Mangosuthu University of Technology, SANEDI and Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University. Biotechnology students Liyabona Mula and Ruvimbo Mhari and political-studies doctoral student Kurisani Mdhluli reflected on links between energy, water, food and climate, practical research applications and the need for interdisciplinary perspectives. These accounts show an opportunity for emerging researchers to engage with government, industry and other students. Their subsequent intentions to collaborate are aspirations recorded in the reflections, rather than completed project outcomes. [E15, Article body / identified programme section]
Making climate action visible through art and science
Creative public engagement gave UWC’s climate contribution an international platform in 2025. The Centre for Humanities Research and its artists-in-residence, Ukwanda Puppets and Design Arts Collective, partnered with The Walk Productions on THE HERDS. UWC’s launch account describes life-size animal puppets made with raw and recycled materials for a public-art journey intended to draw attention to global warming and the vulnerability of wildlife. Luyanda Nogodlwana, Siphokazi Mpofu and Sipho Ngxola developed their practice at the Centre’s Iyatsiba Lab in Woodstock. The partnership linked Cape Town-based creative expertise with a travelling climate-awareness project and plans to train local puppeteers along the route. [E16, Article body / identified programme section]
The project’s subsequent official account confirms that its first journey began in Kinshasa in April 2025 and reached Nordkapp after travelling through African and European towns and cities. That retrospective corroborates delivery of the journey announced by UWC, while avoiding the assumption that a launch itinerary itself proves every planned stop occurred. The public performances brought climate concerns into streets and shared cultural spaces, creating opportunities for audiences to encounter environmental questions outside a classroom or research conference. [E17, Article body / identified programme section]

An animal puppet at the Ukwanda workshop, featured in UWC’s 2025 climate-action account. Credit: Shelley Christians / University of the Western Cape. Image source.
THE HERDS’ associated education programme, Let the Wildness In, provides downloadable habitat-learning packs and puppet-making guides. The resources connect climate action with ecosystems including the Congo Basin, Mediterranean, European forests, Sahara and Arctic. They offer a practical way for young people to engage with the project through making and learning. These are partner resources: the project credits Jessica Dives for writing, Diala Brisly for illustration and Rachel Wild for graphic design, alongside its wider creative team. Their availability complements the UWC-linked public-art partnership; it does not establish that UWC authored the packs or delivered every associated school activity. [E18, Article body / identified programme section]
A different strand of climate communication appears in a 2025 open-access chemistry-education paper coauthored by UWC-affiliated Michael T. Davies-Coleman and Dudley E. Shallcross. A Pollutant’s Tale and its primary-school companion, Gases in the Air, use demonstrations to introduce atmospheric composition, pollution and the climate system to different audiences. The article documents an international programme developed over approximately eighteen years, with recorded versions of the talks and individual demonstration videos. It explains how content can be adapted for learners’ ages and cultural contexts, and connects discussion of greenhouse gases with possible responses to warming.
The publication makes the teaching approach available for other educators to examine and adapt. It also discusses how presenting science to the public can develop students’ planning and communication skills. This is a contribution to the evidence base and resources for climate education, rather than a claim that every demonstration was delivered at UWC or that the programme’s global reach occurred in 2025. The paper is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Its laboratory demonstrations require suitable expertise, safety assessment and supervision; the existence of videos should not be treated as sufficient preparation to reproduce experiments with schoolchildren. [E19, Article pp. 2235–2242; affiliations and licence; public education design; CC BY 4.0]
Building on earlier climate-learning initiatives
Earlier activities show the foundations on which this work developed. During National Science Week in 2019, UWC’s Physics and Astronomy Department offered climate-change debates, public lectures on carbon footprints and school visits linking science with career pathways. The programme considered the causes and effects of climate change and the role of alternative energy. [E20, Article body / identified programme section]
In August 2021, the 34th ACCESS Habitable Planet Workshop brought together 36 students to examine Earth-system science and African perspectives on climate change. UWC academics contributed teaching, while field visits connected scientific concepts with landscapes, ecosystems and heritage. Discussion also addressed the ethical and social questions surrounding climate action. The workshop illustrates a combination of scientific learning, local context and cross-institutional participation, with its date and cohort kept distinct from later activity. [E21, Article body / identified programme section]
Campus climate awareness was also visible in UWC’s March 2019 Green Campus Initiative announcements. These advertised a climate-justice campaign and a campus dialogue on how students and staff contribute to climate change. The notice records the intended opportunities to engage, including a small discussion format. It is useful historical context, but an invitation alone does not verify actual attendance or continuing delivery in 2024 or 2025. [E22, Article body / identified programme section]
Opening discussion on water and early-warning knowledge
UWC’s Institute for Water Studies advertised an Open Day for 21 May 2025 with WISA’s Western Cape Branch as a partner. The planned programme connected remote sensing and big-data research with water management in dry environments, and included CSIR contributions on space-based early-warning technologies. Groundwater vulnerability, precision agriculture and water-sector research support were also on the agenda. The announcement demonstrates an effort to convene researchers and water-management partners around information relevant to climate risk. It does not, by itself, establish delivery of an operational warning service for government or prove the event’s eventual attendance. [E23, Article body / identified programme section]
Connecting climate learning with African land governance
PLAAS and the Network of Excellence on Land Governance in Africa hosted a two-day online course on Climate Change and Land Governance in Africa on 29–30 April 2025. NELGA’s post-course account records participation by land professionals, researchers, civil-society representatives and policymakers from across Africa. Teaching combined climate justice, tenure security, adaptation and sustainable land use with practical case studies and community-led responses. UWC’s later account of the November 2025 Conference on Land Policy in Africa places this pilot alongside PLAAS’s established role as a specialist NELGA node and its wider land-governance training. [C20, Supplied article pp.1–2; conference 10–13 November 2025] [N02, post-course account, 2 May 2025] [N03, 2025 course record]
The same account records commitments to develop and implement the climate course for two cohorts, pursue accreditation, offer more multilingual learning and hold a regional dialogue on land, natural resources or climate change. Those commitments describe the next stage, rather than completed cohorts. It also records the launch of the Land Availability and Land-use Changes in Africa report at a conference side event on 12 November 2025 and a conference call to strengthen relevant training and evidence. This links UWC’s climate-related scholarship to a continental forum while keeping the pilot, future intentions and policy recommendations distinct. [C20, Supplied article p.2; published 4 December 2025]
University climate-action plan shared with local government or communities
UWC's Infrastructure Management Policy explicitly considers climate change in infrastructure planning and calls for sustainability, efficiency and future-proofing within practical and financial conditions. The 2024 Annual Report records Council's 2023 Sustainable Energy Security Strategy decision. These dated institutional provisions remain below, alongside the separate government and community collaborations described in the following sections. [C01] [C02]
Evidence and context
Building climate responsibility into the campus estate
UWC’s Infrastructure Management Policy, approved on 22 September 2022 and implemented the next day, makes climate change an explicit consideration in infrastructure planning. It calls for sustainability to be integrated into projects and for future-proofing against environmental, technological and regulatory change, as far as practical and cost-effective. These commitments sit within a whole-life approach to maintenance, infrastructure risk and investment. The policy also calls for energy- and water-efficient infrastructure, transport choices that prioritise pedestrians and public or non-motorised transport, and landscaping that creates shade and shelter. Its complete relevant provisions below retain the policy’s financial and practical qualifications. [C01, Cover; Preamble; sections 4.2 and 4.5; Annexures A, B and C]
The Annual Report 2024 records that Council approved a Sustainable Energy Security Strategy in 2023 and approved Phase 1 implementation involving solar generation and battery storage. It also describes a Campus Landscaping Project that introduced indigenous, waterwise gardens in the third quarter of 2024. These are dated decisions and activities within a broader institutional sustainability programme. [C02, Physical/printed pp.15, 18, 28]
Policy provisions supporting climate action and resilience
The following complete selected provisions reproduce the relevant wording of the supplied institutional policies. Their scope, responsibilities and practical or financial conditions form part of the commitments. Policy dates identify the supplied versions, while the sources below provide the full documents.
Infrastructure Management Policy: document control
|
|
UWC
|
||
|
Infrastructure Management Policy
|
Council Approval Reference Number
First Approval Amendments |
C2022/03 (22 September 2022)
|
|
|
Implementation Date
|
23 September 2022
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment
|
n/a
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment Date
|
n/a
|
||
|
Provisos
|
n/a
|
||
|
Policy Owner
|
Infrastructure and Engineering
|
||
|
Executive Management Portfolio
|
ED – Finance and Services
|
||
|
Contributors
|
EMC, SPRC, SEC, IBDC, Council
|
||
|
Circulated by:
|
Executive Director – Finance and Services
|
||
|
Circulated to:
|
Institutional Planning and Infrastructure and Engineering staff members.
|
||
University of the Western Cape
Infrastructure Management Policy
Preamble
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
Preamble
Infrastructure management is not just a matter of maintaining existing infrastructure or providing new infrastructure. The focus of this Policy is on balancing these aspects and providing a high-level strategic framework for infrastructure provision and the utilisation thereof. Such an approach requires direction on decision making throughout the infrastructure planning, delivery, operation and disposal processes, it spans the focus of various management and governance structures and follows a risk-based approach to achieve a balance between whole life cost, risk, performance, and sustainability, through:
• providing a defined and agreed level of service and performance monitoring;
• taking a life-cycle approach to developing cost effective management strategies for the long term that meet the desired level of service;
• identifying, assessing and appropriately managing risks; and
• having a medium to long term financial plan which identifies required expenditure and how it will be funded.
It is necessary to determine acceptable and functionally appropriate levels of service, so that infrastructure requirements (and performance and utilisation) can be measured against a set yardstick. Criteria may relate to availability of the service, quality or condition, quantity, reliability, responsiveness, environmental acceptability and financial implications.
Levels of service are informed by a combination of stakeholder needs, legislative requirements and internal business objectives, and need to be sustainable over the estimated service life of the infrastructure. This is a vital part of the infrastructure management process that not only affects decisions on existing infrastructure but also informs choices and decisions affecting the maintenance of existing infrastructure and the provision of new infrastructure.
Infrastructure assets, which support the objectives of the institution, exist to provide value to the University. To ensure that value is maximised, there is a need to understand what infrastructure is required, what infrastructure exists, how well it is being utilised, what condition it is in, its fitness for purpose, its operational costs, and its ability to evolve in changing circumstances.
This Policy will be supported by:
1) The Fixed Asset Policy;
2) Procurement Policy
3) Budget Policy
4) Campus Development Plan; and
5) An annually-updated 3-5-year Infrastructure Management Plan. [C01, Preamble; physical pp. 3]
1 Purpose and 2 Scope
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
1 Purpose
The purpose of this Infrastructure Management Policy is to establish a Council approved policy for key infrastructure-related principles and objectives that the University’s executive management needs to pursue over time. The Policy is supported by
a) a long-term spatial development framework (Campus Development Plan); and
b) an annually-updated 3-5-year infrastructure management plan;
which promote the efficient, economic, effective and sustainable use of resources.
2 Scope
This document establishes the University’s policy for the management of its infrastructure. It includes the management of:
a) the demand for infrastructure;
b) the creation and prioritisation of a pipeline of interventions; as well as
c) the management of land holdings. [C01, 1 Purpose and 2 Scope; physical pp. 4]
3 Definition of concepts
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
3 Definition of concepts
Infrastructure comprises immovable assets which are acquired or constructed or which result from construction operations and includes moveable assets which cannot function independently from purpose built immoveable assets. It includes Information and Communication Technology (ICT) networks and systems that are used to communicate and to create disseminate, store and manage information, as well as security technology installations.
Asset management seeks to effectively, efficiently, economically and sustainably utilise infrastructure to serve the current and emerging needs of the University. Asset management accordingly considers the entire lifecycle (service life) of the infrastructure asset and the associated costs, from the identification of a need through operating costs, and finally to the final decommissioning and disposal of the asset. [C01, 3 Definition of concepts; physical pp. 4]
4.2 opening and 4.2.1 Life-cycle planning
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
4.2 Management of infrastructure
The University will manage its infrastructure based on the principles set out in Annexure A. The University’s Executive Management is responsible for all aspects of infrastructure management and these functions are largely executed on its behalf by the Executive Director: Finance and Services. In this regard the University will attend to:
4.2.1 Life-cycle infrastructure asset management planning for large individual assets or groups of infrastructure assets, which include operation, maintenance and refurbishment requirements. This planning will inform major refurbishment or upgrading requirements which are incorporated into the infrastructure management plan. [C01, 4.2 opening and 4.2.1 Life-cycle planning; physical pp. 5]
4.2.2 Facilities management
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
4.2.2 Facilities management, ensuring that:
a) the necessary internal and external facilities management resources are in place;
b) engineering infrastructure management including the following, occurs:
5) budgeting and preparation for planned as well as unplanned maintenance;
6) regular checking of hard services (mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) services) to keep them serviceable with special attention being paid to critical infrastructure;
7) identification and establishment of condition monitoring and inspection plans as per the operating and maintenance manuals to check, test or replace infrastructure systems, subsystems, assemblies or components;
8) preventative (scheduled, routine) maintenance plans are drafted and implemented;
9) all breakdowns are addressed immediately and repairs planned and prioritised; and
10) a record is made of infrastructure breakdowns and incidents which can be analysed to identify trends to inform decisions;
c) the day to day soft services (e.g. cleaning, security, catering, fire protection, waste management, reception services) are done properly and that staff or contractors and their performance is measured and reported against performance specifications; and
d) demobilisation of facilities management (e.g. Service Level Agreements) for infrastructure that will be disposed of as well as for infrastructure earmarked for upgrades, refurbishments or rehabilitation. [C01, 4.2.2 Facilities management; physical pp. 5]
4.2.3 Infrastructure information system
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
4.2.3 Progressive development of an infrastructure management system to provide reliable, consistent and updated infrastructure information to enable optimised decisions to be made, which should:
a) be used to inform infrastructure management activities; and
b) provide improved risk control assurance that the objectives in the infrastructure management policy will be achieved on a consistent basis. [C01, 4.2.3 Infrastructure information system; physical pp. 5]
4.2.5 Occupational health, safety and environmental compliance
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
4.2.5 The management of all occupational health and safety and environmental compliance matters in relation to infrastructure and the usage of land. [C01, 4.2.5 Occupational health, safety and environmental compliance; physical pp. 5]
4.2.8 Infrastructure oversight
4.2.8 Reporting of infrastructure management-related matters to the oversight committees identified in Table 1, who will approve actions that are necessary for the progressive implementation of principles associated with the management of University infrastructure as set out in Annex A.
Table 1: Oversight committees
|
Item
|
Area of management
|
Responsible person
|
Oversight committee
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
4.2.8.1
|
Life-cycle infrastructure asset management planning
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
|
|
4.2.8.2
|
Mobilisation for facilities management
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
|
|
4.2.8.3
|
Development of an infrastructure management system
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
|
|
4.2.8.4
|
Leases for infrastructure
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Finance Committee
|
|
4.2.8.5
|
Occupational health and safety and environmental compliance
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Safety, Health, Environment and Risk Committee
|
|
4.2.8.6
|
Access and security
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Safety, Health, Environment and Risk Committee
|
|
4.2.8.7
|
ICT infrastructure
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Information, Communication and Technology Governance Committee
|
|
4.2.8.8
|
Infrastructure development implementation oversight
Project Boards |
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
• Infrastructure Business Development Committee
• Council
|
|
4.2.8.9
|
Infrastructure development project proposals
|
Executive Management
|
• Infrastructure and Business Development Committee
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
|
|
4.2.8.10
|
Infrastructure acquisitions
|
Executive Management
|
• Infrastructure and Business Development Committee
• Finance Committee
• Council
|
|
4.2.8.11
|
Infrastructure development funding
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Executive Management Committee
• Finance Committee
|
|
4.2.8.12
|
Infrastructure procurement and contract awards
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Tender Committee
|
[C01, section 4.2.8 and Table 1, physical pp. 6–7]
4.3 Spatial development frameworks
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
4.3 Spatial development frameworks
4.3.1 The University will have a Campus Development Plan (CDP) providing a long-term overall spatial vision for its campuses drawing upon the universal spatial development principles outlined in Annex B. The CDP is a Council approved document and the University Council will approve any significant changes to it.
4.3.2 The University will ensure that all planning for new infrastructure is aligned with the Campus Development Plan. [C01, 4.3 Spatial development frameworks; physical pp. 7]
4.5 Infrastructure management plans
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
4.5 Infrastructure management plans
4.5.1 The University will develop an annual Infrastructure Management Plan, that will include planning for new infrastructure, as well as plans for the operation, maintenance, refurbishment and rehabilitation of existing infrastructure, and disposal of infrastructure which is no longer required to meet the University’s objectives, and it will be based on:
a) factors such as policies, norms and standards, condition assessments, functional performance, student enrolment trends, student housing demand trends, current and forecasted levels of optimisation, and academic requirements;
b) the infrastructure planning principles contained in Annexure C;
c) the grouping of projects into programmes to enable cash flow projections for projects during a financial year to be adjusted and funds to be moved between projects within a programme to avoid under-expenditure without changing the purpose for which funds were approved; and
d) the readiness of projects for implementation.
4.5.2 The University will ensure that the following is undertaken for all projects admitted to a pipeline of projects at Stage 0 (Project Initiation) in accordance with the provisions of the University’s Procurement Policy:
a) the identification of the impediments and constraints to project implementation and establishment of the timelines required to resolve them;
b) the identification of high risk critical infrastructure; and
c) the prioritisation of projects and the establishment of realistic budgets and timelines over a 3 to 5-year period. [C01, 4.5 Infrastructure management plans; physical pp. 7, 8]
4.6 Financial Management of Infrastructure Development
The University’s large-scale infrastructure development projects are mainly funded through the DHET’s infrastructure grants, supplemented by an agreed proportion of University funding and donor funding. Building maintenance is funded through the University’s Council controlled operational funds. Financial management of infrastructure will include:
a) annual budget allocations to support the maintenance and management requirements of the University’s infrastructure
b) infrastructure development budget consideration and recommendation to Council by the Council Finance Committee;
c) the approval of infrastructure development project budgets by the Council.;
d) monthly meetings of all infrastructure development Project Boards where the appointed professional team must present reports on project budgets and progress. The reports must at least include a report from the principal agent, quantity surveyor and architect. [C01, section 4.6, physical p. 8]
The policy’s reference to the National Energy Act No. 34 of 1998 below is reproduced as printed. The official statute is the National Energy Act 34 of 2008. [C18, Official Act title and year]
Annexure A principles a)–p)
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
Annexure A: Principles associated with the management of University infrastructure
The principles associated with the management of the University’s infrastructure are:
a) The requirements of the following regulatory framework need to be met:
• The Occupational Health and Safety Act including the
- Construction Regulations,
- Electrical Installation Regulations
- Pressure Vessel Regulations,
- Lift Escalator and Passenger Conveyer Regulations,
- Driven Machinery and General Machinery Regulations;
• The National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act including the National Building Regulations; and
• The National Heritage Resources Act.
• The National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998
• The National Energy Act No. 34 of 1998
b) All Department of Higher Education and Training infrastructure-related policies need to be adhered to, including the Higher Education Act, Space and Cost Norms for Buildings and other Land Improvements and the Policy on the Minimum Norms and Standards for Student Housing at Public Universities.
c) The value of infrastructure needs to be optimised i.e. the cost of the infrastructure provided to achieve the University’s objectives and service standards should be minimised, whilst also considering environmental, social and economic impacts.
d) Infrastructure needs to be used efficiently and reconfigured or, where practical, disposed of if it does not support the university’s objectives.
e) Infrastructure needs to be maintained and operated in such a way as to minimise life-cycle costs.
f) Where possible, changes in demand for infrastructure need to be met with solutions which do not require the acquisition of new infrastructure, taking into consideration the university’s whole portfolio (for example, maximising the use of existing facilities, or reconfiguring them, rather than building new ones, considering sharing expensive specialist facilities between universities and leasing of existing infrastructure).
g) Risks relating to the ownership, use and operation of infrastructure need to be managed as follows:
• the possible consequences of failure of infrastructure needs to be identified and mitigated in a cost-effective manner;
• critical infrastructure should be identified using a risk-based approach by assessing both the probability of failure and the potential impact on the University’s operations;
• high risk infrastructure needs to be prioritised, especially if this is potentially life-threatening or poses a risk to the achievement of the University’s core objectives; and
• the University’s liability in the event of infrastructure-related claims needs to be minimised.
• Appropriate and continuing investment in bulk services infrastructure (water, electricity and fire)
h) The University’s infrastructure should be accessible, energy-efficient, water-efficient and sustainable.
i) Designs need to consider optimal flexibility of use.
j) All infrastructure needs to be registered in an infrastructure asset register and linked into the University’s accounting system 1. The infrastructure asset register should include information such as:
• date of capitalisation and total acquisition cost;
• ownership of land, registration, location;
• infrastructure identification (including location);
• infrastructure expected useful life and remaining useful life;
• infrastructure condition;
• infrastructure value (based on Depreciated Replacement Cost);
• insurance if applicable;
• dates and costs of repairs, upgrades, replacement and disposals; and
• leasing information.
k) There needs to be periodic condition assessments of infrastructure, the results of which need to be captured on the infrastructure asset register and used to inform infrastructure plans and budgets.
l) There needs to be a periodic assessment of the levels of performance and service that infrastructure delivers, and these should be analysed against the requirements and expectations of users.
m) There needs to be a system or process for prioritisation of repairs.
n) There needs to be a system for handling of complaints and responding to requests from infrastructure users, which should include standards for reasonable response times.
o) There needs to be consultation with relevant stakeholders regarding infrastructure plans.
p) There needs to be ongoing consideration of rapidly evolving technologies (4IR, Smart Buildings etc) and these must be considered in the design, upgrading and utilisation of infrastructure.
1 The Higher Education Act states that the Council of a university must keep complete accounting records of all assets. [C01, Annexure A complete principles a)–p), including clause-j footnote; physical pp. 9, 10]
Annexure B: Universal spatial planning principles
The development of a guiding spatial framework (Campus Development Plan) for a university gives form, content and meaning to the physical requirements. The design of university campuses should define and celebrate the University’s sense of place, communicating the institution’s purpose, presence and peculiar identity.
The influences determining form are multi-faceted and complex. Nevertheless, the following universal design principles have relevance in developing and shaping the University campuses and should inform and be applied in varying forms. [C01, Annexure B introduction, physical p. 11]
Annexure B 1) Equity and dignity: transport, shade and shelter
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
1) Equity and dignity
Equity does not imply that everything should be the same. Rather, it refers to equity of access - all people should have the opportunity to access a broadly equivalent set of opportunities. Accordingly, equity of access in a spatial context implies commitment to a movement system anchored by the lowest common denominator, namely people on foot. This requires:
• the promotion of principles of universal access;
• the establishing of a network of shared amenities accessible to all students across university campuses;
• establishing a balanced movement network, allowing for equitable access to the University by public transport, non-motorised transport, pedestrians and private vehicles;
• a commitment to the promotion of pedestrian, non-motorised transport and public transport over private vehicular movement;
• the promotion of pedestrian priority; and
• the developing of non-obtrusive parking strategies.
The University is populated by students from many different walks of life. Accordingly, a basic right of all students is to meet in dignified public spaces which are ‘owned’ by all, regardless of personal circumstances.
Spatially, the emphasis is on creating dignified places for informal meeting, using all new buildings and objects to define and make space, using selective, powerful landscaping in different ways to define place, to create shade and shelter and to reinforce structural informants. [C01, Annexure B 1) Equity and dignity: transport, shade and shelter; physical pp. 11]
Annexure B 3) Quality of shared/common spaces
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
3) Quality of shared/common spaces
Any plan for the University needs to consider place making i.e. the creation of a sense of spatial uniqueness and identity. An important part of this is developing an appropriate response to the site. The spatial implications of this include working with the land, working with water, use of landmarks and the appropriate use of indigenous vegetation.
The aim of all universities should be to promote a holistic teaching and learning environment, as opposed to just a classroom-based one. Central to this is recognising the importance of informal mixing and social contact between students of diverse disciplinary backgrounds as part of the total educational experience. The implication of this from a spatial perspective is the creation of dignified, pleasant places of meeting in the public realm. A variety of shared spaces should be offered, which represent the primary informal gathering or meeting spaces for students, staff and residents alike. The dignity of these places will impact on the dignity of the university campuses.
Safety and security and heritage considerations need to be taken into account in the creation of these common spaces. [C01, Annexure B 3) Quality of shared/common spaces; physical pp. 12]
Annexure B 4) Robustness and flexibility
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
4) Robustness and flexibility
The spatial framework needs to be strong enough to give clear direction yet sufficiently minimalist to accommodate growth and change. Planning cannot be driven by programmes - it needs to be based on the elements of public structure i.e. green space, movement of all modes, shared public facilities (libraries, meeting places, sports facilities and recreation, performance and display spaces), hard open space, housing and utility services. These need to be woven together into a coherent framework which creates a logic of access, ranging from very public or exposed to very private.
Planning needs to reflect a consistency of thought across scales which requires a ‘package of plans’ approach, with each larger scale providing the fixes for successively smaller scales. Connecting scales and integrating city activities is an important part of the challenge. [C01, Annexure B 4) Robustness and flexibility; physical pp. 12]
Annexure B 6) Sustainability and efficiency, plus concluding framework
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
6) Sustainability and efficiency
Decisions taken in relation to the location, design and management of the institutions need to be geared towards optimal sustainability. The university campuses should play a leadership role in demonstrating sustainable practices. The University should demonstrate best practice in terms of a broad spectrum of environmental and sustainability including efficiency of land utilisation.
The academic vision and the spatial directions of universities should be considered as complementary and synergistic. Direction should accordingly be derived from:
• interrogating the University’s mission statement, which provides the highest order of direction for the spatial development plan, to explore the spatial implications of the academic mission;
• identifying the desirable performance qualities which a university in South Africa in the 21st century should be seeking to achieve which have spatial implications; and
• a comprehensive understanding of the contextual informants (the concrete things which have material substance, shape, topography, environmental character, climate, texture, as well as socio- economic features) which embody very different properties, in accordance with the unique cultural and environmental conditions of the place within which the University campus is located.
Academic vision for a particular campus can also have spatial implications for in the creation of:
• living and working environments of a quality that attracts and retains world renown academics;
• adequate library, student resource amenities, student accommodation with meals and self-catering and IT facilities.
The method employed in the development of spatial plans needs to elevate planning and design from opinion to argument in order to seek sufficient consensus around the desired norms and their spatial implications. [C01, Annexure B 6) Sustainability and efficiency, plus concluding framework; physical pp. 13]
Annexure C infrastructure planning principles
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 2022-09-22 | Effective 2022-09-23
Annexure C: Infrastructure planning principles
Infrastructure projects are identified, planned and costed, as relevant, by:
a) obtaining and considering the expectations and requirements of stakeholders in the University;
b) determining appropriate levels of service and identifying the infrastructure required to meet this level of service and to achieve the University’s strategic objectives;
c) establishing an infrastructure baseline by reviewing existing infrastructure assets, including the identification of mission-critical assets;
d) assessing existing infrastructure assets in terms of their efficiency of use, and proposing improvements;
e) identifying any gaps between the existing infrastructure and the required infrastructure;
f) considering all possible ways of meeting the gaps, such as building new infrastructure, renting infrastructure, utilising existing infrastructure more effectively, reconfiguring existing infrastructure or sharing infrastructure with other institutions, to determine the best solutions to the gaps;
g) taking a ‘whole-portfolio’ approach when considering options for addressing gaps, enabling all available options to achieve the required levels of service to be considered, ensuring the provision of infrastructure at the lowest life-cycle cost;
h) analysing asset management information;
i) determining the functional requirements and required level of service for new infrastructure and applying the space and cost norms to the needs for new infrastructure;
j) comparing the needs against the budget, and prioritising in terms of this policy if the needs exceed the budget; and
k) planning for capital projects taking into account the operation and maintenance of the infrastructure for its entire estimated design life after it has been constructed.
l) Integrating sustainability principles and strategies into all projects
m) Future proofing all projects, as far as it is practical and cost-effective, against changes in the environmental (e.g. climate change), technological (e.g. 4IR) and regulatory spheres.
Adequate access control and monitoring infrastructure needs to be put in place to provide a safe environment for the University community.
Credible forecasts of the current and net demand for services or requirements for functionality should be made over a period of not less than ten years. [C01, Annexure C complete infrastructure planning principles; physical pp. 14]
Open/download the complete Infrastructure Management Policy (PDF)
Cooperative climate-disaster planning with government
UWC's urban-transition research connects residents' experiences of water and energy insecurity with municipal and national discussions. A separate 2024–2027 climate-mobilities research partnership includes public bodies and addresses adaptation for people with insecure housing. The full accounts retain their research and engagement scope, dates and next steps. [P07] [P09] [P20]
Evidence and context
Making the urban climate transition socially just
Climate action changes who can obtain essential services and who pays for them. UWC’s Politics and Urban Governance Research Group leads Governing the Just Urban Transition, an NRF-supported project running from 2024 to 2026 with the Gauteng City-Region Observatory and researchers at Cambridge, Cardiff and Sheffield. Its focus is how small businesses in low-income parts of Johannesburg and Cape Town secure water and energy during recurring service interruptions. The research design combines interviews, observation, surveys and participatory photography to bring everyday coping practices into discussion about a fair transition. In April 2025, the team met at UWC and undertook engagement in Khayelitsha. In October, participants from Setswetla presented photographic accounts of their businesses’ water and energy challenges at a Johannesburg City Forum exhibition. These activities make residents’ experience visible in research and public discussion without assuming that recommendations have already become policy. [P07, Project background; April 2025 workshop; October 2025 Setswetla exhibition]
A related South African Cities Network research paper, co-authored by Fiona Anciano and Christina Culwick Fatti, examines the governance required for a just urban transition. Through renewable-energy, informal-settlement sanitation and housing cases, it considers how government, businesses and community organisations share power and responsibility. The paper highlights a difficult connection: private infrastructure can improve security for those able to afford it while affecting the municipal revenue used to support wider services. Its policy contribution is to make such distributional choices explicit and to encourage adaptable, collaborative approaches. Published as an August 2023 report and discussed subsequently with practitioners, it provides a foundation for engagement rather than evidence that one governance model has been implemented in every city. [P08, Executive summary, case studies and reflections on governance]
Bringing research into government and city discussions
On 22 July 2024, UWC’s PUG group, the South African Cities Network and the Gauteng City-Region Observatory hosted an online knowledge exchange on off-grid cities and just-transition governance. Fiona Anciano and Christina Culwick Fatti presented the research. The discussion included the Presidential Climate Commission, the National Treasury Cities Support Programme and the Public Affairs Research Institute, with responses from officials of Johannesburg and Cape Town. PUG reports 221 participants. This is a documented route through which UWC research reached people working on national and municipal climate questions, including the interaction between decarbonisation, infrastructure finance and social inclusion. [P09, Completed event account; start/end dates; panellists and attendance]
The exchange built on continuing work with cities. The Off-grid Cities project had convened a municipal roundtable in November 2023 involving Cape Town, Johannesburg and Tshwane to discuss private renewable-energy investment and its implications for municipalities. Its 2024 programme then combined practitioner engagement with collaborative writing and academic dissemination. These activities place climate-transition research in conversation with the institutions responsible for providing urban services. [P10, Project activities: November 2023 and 2024]
Climate adaptation and insecure housing
International climate research also examines what adaptation means for people with insecure housing. King’s College London lists UWC among the partners in Transforming Places for the Precariously Housed: Equitable Adaptation Pathways for Climate Mobilities, with a project period from June 2024 to June 2027. The collaboration includes Carleton University as lead, other universities, the Greater London Authority and the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. The grant record establishes UWC’s participation in research connecting housing insecurity and equitable adaptation; it does not yet establish completed community interventions or policy outcomes. [P20, Project dates and collaborative partners]
Supporting government climate-risk warning and monitoring
UWC's 2025 flood research offers modelling and spatial-analysis approaches relevant to preparedness. Government-linked SmartAgri reporting also identifies UWC as an extreme-heat adaptation partner in a 2025–2026 monitoring-and-prediction project. The complete account retains the tool's planned development stage and distinguishes retrospective flood mapping from a live warning system. [P12] [P14] [P17] [N01]
Evidence and context
Flood science for better preparedness
In 2025, UWC’s Institute for Water Studies communicated research calling for flood preparedness to combine stronger technical models with the realities of vulnerable communities. Timothy Dube, Sibuyisele Pakati and collaborator Cletah Shoko highlighted gaps in data, infrastructure and the inclusion of informal settlements in planning. Their recommendations favour integrating climate projections, real-time monitoring and community perspectives with urban governance. This public-facing contribution helps explain why flood risk cannot be addressed through technical simulation alone; it is a research-based call for improved practice, rather than evidence of an adopted government disaster plan. [P12, Research explanation and government-facing recommendations]
The team’s 2025 global review examines the strengths and limits of urban flood models and proposes a framework for choosing suitable methods. It identifies the value of combining hydraulic and hydrological models with satellite information, including radar that can operate through cloud and rain. It also identifies unresolved questions about integrating detailed climate projections, socio-economic conditions and rapid land-use changes. The work supports more informed choices about modelling and risk assessment, while recognising that data quality and validation constrain what a model can reliably show. [P13, Abstract, model comparison and research gaps]
A separate 2025 study by Pakati, Shoko and Dube applies Earth-observation methods to Cape Town’s 2023 flood period. It combines Sentinel-1 radar, Sentinel-2 imagery and Google Earth Engine to map inundation and examine affected land-cover classes. The study identifies particular exposure in low-lying built-up areas and locations near floodplains and water bodies. Such spatial analysis can help planners identify where further investigation and preparedness are needed. It is retrospective research on a defined flood episode, not a live warning system or a measured reduction in disaster losses. [P14, Abstract, methods and conclusions; first-page publication dates]
Natural systems as part of climate resilience
Research involving UWC ecologist Patrick O’Farrell examines how municipal decisions account for the benefits supplied by natural open spaces. Published in the 2024 volume of People and Nature after first appearing online in December 2023, the study analyses Nelson Mandela Bay’s planning documents and interviews conducted from October to December 2019 with eleven senior municipal officials and one implementing-agency representative. It finds that service-delivery pressures, institutional constraints and differing understandings of nature shape management choices. The researchers argue for stronger attention to regulating services, collaborative management and the involvement of officials in developing practical decision-support tools. These are relevant foundations for climate resilience, but the study does not show that its recommendations were subsequently adopted by the municipality. [P15, Abstract; methods; discussion and policy implications]
O’Farrell brought related concerns into public discussion in March 2025, drawing attention to the intersection of climate change, urban development and ecosystem degradation. His account connects the loss of functioning natural systems with the uneven distribution of benefits across Cape Town, including the Cape Flats. It also recognises the competing responsibilities facing local government, such as housing, employment and municipal revenue. This contribution frames resilience as a planning question involving both ecological function and residents’ wellbeing, rather than treating conservation as separate from social development. [P16, Public interview and urban planning discussion]
International cooperation on heat adaptation
The Western Cape Government’s 2025 SmartAgri reporting identifies UWC’s School of Public Health as an implementation partner in a Mediterranean Climate Action Partnership project on extreme heat. Led by the Regional Government of Santiago in Chile, with the Western Cape and California as partner regions, the collaboration includes Universidad de Chile, Universidad Andrés Bello and REDPE. Its planned Heat Island Monitoring and Prediction Tool will combine temperature observations with census and health data to help regional and local authorities identify exposed areas and inform adaptation. The December account sets out a 2025–2026 programme of baseline assessment, heat sampling and tool development. It establishes UWC’s participation in government-linked adaptation cooperation; it does not yet establish an operational tool or measured reduction in heat risk. [P17, MCAP mini-sprint project 2: extreme heat; physical p. 19/printed p. 19] [N01, MCAP extreme-heat project, physical/printed p. 13]
NGO collaboration on climate adaptation
The Giyani Local Scale Climate Resilience Programme brought UWC together with the non-profit AWARD, Tsogang Water and Sanitation, the Water Research Commission and municipalities. UWC contributed water and energy expertise within the partnership. Other retained examples include NGO-and-resident flood-risk assessment in Diepsloot and collaborative coastal and land-rights research, each with its own scope and dates. [P01] [A01] [P02] [P11]
Evidence and context
Community-led climate resilience in Giyani
UWC’s role in the Giyani Local Scale Climate Resilience Programme connects climate research with the everyday need for reliable water. Funded by the Government of Flanders and coordinated through the Water Research Commission, the programme brought the University together with the non-profit Association for Water and Rural Development (AWARD) and Tsogang Water and Sanitation. AWARD records implementation at nine sites in Greater Giyani: four community water-supply sites and five agricultural cooperatives. Its completion account dates the programme from November 2021 to May 2025 and reports a cumulative reach of 5,000 people. These are partnership-wide figures for selected communities, rather than an annual UWC beneficiary total. [P01, Overview, timeline, funders and partners] [A01, organisational status]
The programme’s water-use guideline makes the division of responsibilities clear. UWC supplied water and energy technical expertise; Tsogang led infrastructure work; AWARD supported learning and stakeholder engagement; and the WRC’s enterprise-development arm addressed local economic opportunities. The collaboration worked with Mopani District and Greater Giyani local municipalities. Prepared in a file dated November 2024, the guideline treats adaptation as a household and community practice: matching water use to the supply available, maintaining equipment, protecting shared resources and supporting gardens, livestock and small businesses. It recognises that households using communal collection points face different constraints from those with private sources. [P02, Acknowledgements; programme roles; purpose and household access categories]
From feasibility studies to monitored pilot systems
The technical foundations were developed through site-specific research. A 2023 paper by UWC researchers Nebojša Jovanovic, Mandelwa Mpambo and Alana Willoughby and colleagues used stakeholder engagement, field information and the Solar Powered Irrigation Systems toolbox to assess nine proposed sites. It considered water availability and quality, pumping requirements, financial arrangements and the suitability of renewable energy. The study identified opportunities to reduce dependence on diesel and unreliable electricity, while also identifying a risk: inexpensive solar pumping can encourage excessive abstraction. Its practical message is that clean energy and water security need to be designed together, with groundwater monitoring, appropriate treatment and arrangements for operation and maintenance. The feasibility calculations supported decisions about pilots; they were not measurements of benefits already achieved across Limpopo. [P03, Methods, nine-site feasibility assessment, discussion and conclusions]
By the May/June 2024 WISA conference publication, a UWC-authored presentation abstract reported that solar-powered groundwater and multiple-use systems had been established at nine pilot sites. Six months of monitoring examined water volumes, quality and productivity. The findings were mixed: pumping rates varied, groundwater levels declined at some stages and recovered after rainfall or flooding, and water-quality problems required treatment systems. The abstract also reported energy-cost savings and community training. This provides direct evidence of implemented and monitored adaptation work by 2024, while its call for continued monitoring makes clear that lasting performance still required evaluation. [P04, Session 10, groundwater presentations; physical p. 62, printed p. 60]
Infrastructure, practical learning and local ownership
A July 2025 account by the Water Research Commission describes installed solar-powered boreholes, refurbished reservoirs, irrigation improvements and decentralised treatment, alongside training in water conservation, water-quality testing and maintenance. At Matsambo Ngamba Farm, it reports a refurbished borehole, new storage and solar pumping, together with hydroponic production and farming support. The account also records handover to Greater Giyani and Mopani municipalities and agreements about community operation and maintenance. These examples show the programme moving beyond demonstration equipment towards local management. They remain reported outcomes from the programme sponsor, rather than an independent assessment of every site, and the account acknowledges continuing drought, infrastructure and maintenance challenges. [P05, Implementation, Matsambo Ngamba Farm, community water scheme, training and municipal handover]
Earlier engagement helped connect the technology with farmers’ priorities. UWC’s March 2023 account of the Giyani knowledge-transfer expo describes a programme organised around water and energy, agriculture and local enterprise. Emerging farmers and entrepreneurs were invited to technical discussions and demonstrations, with a cooperative-farm visit and public produce market in the programme. This history illustrates the partnership’s emphasis on exchange with local producers alongside scientific assessment. [P06, Programme description and expo itinerary]
Learning about flood risk with communities
UWC also participated in a practical discussion of flooding in Diepsloot in July 2024. A GCRO and University College London project explored how nature-based approaches could inform water management in the informal settlement. At a workshop hosted by Wot-If, UWC colleagues joined researchers, the NGO Sticky Situations and residents to identify flood-prone places on maps and walk to a river crossing used by the community. The visit connected modelling and survey information with people’s accounts of flooding, waste and everyday access. Subsequent interviews and report-writing were intended to guide possible interventions. The documented achievement is collaborative assessment and planning: the account does not claim that UWC installed flood-control infrastructure or that flooding was reduced. [P11, Research visit, 12 July 2024 workshop, walkabout and planned report]
Coastal adaptation shaped by local knowledge
UWC was a co-investigating university in Eco-ACE, an NRF-funded collaboration with the University of Cape Town and Nelson Mandela University during 2022–2024. The programme explored ecosystem-based adaptation with coastal communities, bringing together modelling, participatory research and creative methods. Its work included St Helena Bay, Melkhoutfontein and an Eastern Cape case-study site. By involving people who depend on coastal resources, the collaboration sought to connect ecological change with local livelihoods and to make community knowledge more visible in decisions about adaptation. The partner account describes a shared research programme; its activities and contributions should not be attributed to UWC alone. [P18, Past projects: Eco-ACE] [P19, project funding acknowledgement, final slide]
A 2024 Eco-ACE progress presentation shows what this approach involved. Community stakeholder mapping and needs assessment in Melkhoutfontein sat alongside research using photographs and ethnographic methods around the Swartkops River estuary. Other work examined how fishing crews, workers and rights holders understood change, while ecosystem modelling explored possible futures for the southern Benguela. A sustainable-fishing card game was adapted for the regional context and translated into Afrikaans. The presentation also identifies limits, including consultation fatigue, the challenge of integrating different kinds of evidence and the difficulty of measuring comparable impacts across projects. Its account is one of learning and developing methods, rather than a claim that all coastal communities had become climate-resilient. [P19, Slides 7–13: community methods, knowledge integration, game and progress limits]
Climate action, land and rural livelihoods
PLAAS’s 2025 report Land Availability and Land-use Changes in Africa adds a land-rights perspective to climate action. Prepared by Phillan Zamchiya and Charity Rusere with support from the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy and the Oakland Institute, it combines literature, spatial information and farmer interviews. The report challenges assumptions that land described as unused is free of livelihood, customary or ecological value. It examines pressures associated with agriculture, conservation, carbon projects and minerals needed for the energy transition, and argues that policy alternatives must take existing users and their rights seriously. This is a contribution to the debate about who benefits from climate-related investment, not evidence that the report’s recommendations have become law. [P21, Imprint and acknowledgements; executive summary; policy alternatives]
A December 2024 field account by Zamchiya illustrates why those questions matter. During a visit to Ndangane in Senegal on 8 October 2024, he examined tensions around a community conservation area and herders’ access to grazing. The account describes competing environmental and livelihood claims and argues for fuller consultation, consent and locally grounded mediation. It cautions against assuming that an intervention described as green will be equitable for everyone affected. This was research and critical observation by a PLAAS scholar, rather than a conservation project delivered by UWC. [P22, Field visit and concluding analysis]
This work builds on PLAAS’s earlier policy-oriented research agenda on climate change and rural livelihoods in Southern Africa. Its 2022 review called for climate responses to draw on social-science understanding of inequality, institutional capacity and the politics of adaptation as well as biophysical evidence. It presented questions for continuing research rather than settled solutions. That distinction remains important when assessing climate initiatives in places where land, employment and access to resources are already contested. [P23, Report summary and research-agenda conclusions]
In October 2025, PLAAS brought these debates into a wider international forum through its Land, Life and Society conference marking thirty years of the institute. More than 250 researchers, civil-society partners and supporters discussed land rights, inequality and climate change. The gathering included South African and Colombian ministerial participation and culminated in a Cape Town declaration, drafted after the conference, for contribution to the forthcoming international agrarian-reform conference. It provided a platform linking evidence and public debate across countries; the declaration’s intended later use should be distinguished from any subsequent governmental adoption. [P24, Conference dates, participants and declaration]
Carbon-neutral commitment
Commitment to carbon neutral university
Carbon-neutral target date and Greenhouse Gas Protocol context
The July 2025 energy MOU identifies lowering UWC's carbon footprint among its aims. The full energy-programme account and infrastructure provisions retain the programme stages and institutional conditions behind that aim. [C04] [C01]
Further contributions and context
Safety requirements for service providers
UWC’s published supplier terms require compliance with campus safety, fire, emergency and security procedures and call for hazards outside a provider’s control to be reported. These are practical safeguards for campus operations. The document is undated, with a February 2023 file identifier; the requirements apply within the relevant service agreement. [PL07, Clauses 14 and 23; physical pp.8 and 13–14]
Environmental responsibility in purchasing
UWC’s Procurement Policy, amended by Council on 27 March 2025, links purchasing decisions to environmental protection, pollution reduction and better use of natural resources. Its safety, health and environment principle covers students, staff and service providers. Responsibility for monitoring and managing supplies rests with the relevant department. The cover records the original 2008 implementation date; section 3.1 provides for commencement on a date determined by Council, rather than stating a separate commencement date for the 2025 amendment. [PL03, Cover; section 2, SHE principle; sections 3.1 and 5.4; physical pp.1, 12, 13, 15]
Green New World: designing an integrated climate demonstrator
In April 2025, UWC described Green New World as an integrated water–energy–food demonstration platform under development on West Campus. A perimeter fence had been installed and trainees were contributing to agrivoltaics, battery integration and battery-cooling work. The Energy Storage and Fluid Treatment Centre within the South African Institute for Advanced Materials Chemistry was leading Phase One. [C05, Published 16 April 2025; supplied article pp.1–2]
The planned 90 kW agrivoltaic system would combine crop production with solar panels, power conditioning, batteries and inverters. Intended uses included pumping and purifying groundwater, irrigation, cooling, electric mobility and supplying part of an adjacent building. The project sought to generate practical knowledge for integrated systems that could serve communities and industry. [C05, Supplied article pp.1–2]
The source states that construction depended on City of Cape Town approval of submitted plans. It proposed an AgriPV course for 2026 and a later HySA Systems phase involving hydrogen production, compression, refuelling and fuel-cell applications. Funding acknowledged in the 2025 account included the Department of Science, Technology and Innovation, Water Energy SETA and Horizon Europe’s AgriCOOL programme. These plans describe the demonstrator’s development pathway, without establishing completed 2025 generation or a delivered 2026 course. [C05, Supplied article pp.1–2]

Green New World site preparation, accompanying UWC’s April 2025 account. The photograph’s exact capture date is unverified. Credit: Jesi Townsend / University of the Western Cape. Image source.
Water resilience as a practical response to drought
UWC’s water-resilience work predates the 2025 reporting year. Its August 2019 account describes a borehole-water purification plant near the Sports Stadium and an atmospheric water generator acquired in response to drought and climate pressures. The University reported nominal production capacities of 500,000 litres a day and approximately 2,000 litres a day respectively. These are the capacities stated in that historical account, rather than measured 2025 production. [C10, Published 30 August 2019]
The programme also prioritised repairing leaks, upgrading plumbing and pipe infrastructure and encouraging more careful water use. The City of Cape Town was involved in testing during development. This combines infrastructure with the behavioural dimension of adaptation: maintaining services while reducing avoidable demand. [C10, Published 30 August 2019]
Wetlands, waterwise landscaping and ecological observation
The Cape Flats Nature Reserve places conservation within UWC’s urban campus. The University’s reserve overview connects protection of local vegetation and habitats with teaching, research, environmental education, indigenous gardening and public engagement. These activities provide a setting for understanding ecological processes and the relationship between human use and natural systems. [C12, Nature Reserve Unit overview; undated]
For World Wetlands Day in February 2025, UWC highlighted the reserve’s seasonal wetlands following the heavy winter rains of 2024. The published account describes the wetland as a human-made feature created in 1977 and explains its role in filtering water, replenishing groundwater and buffering excessive rainfall. Its environmental education officer linked protection of this habitat with learning and public access. These ecological functions are relevant to climate resilience, without amounting to a quantified campus flood-protection or carbon-offset assessment. [C11, Published 14 February 2025]
The reserve’s 14–19 October 2024 faunal survey brought together 198 participants, including University departments, specialists, community members and school learners. Participants submitted 3,143 photographs through a shared folder and iNaturalist, documenting 273 species during the event. This dated activity demonstrates collaborative ecological observation and learning. [C13, Event 14–19 October 2024; account published 2025]
The 13–18 October 2025 survey continued that practice with 108 participants from schools, clubs and local communities. The published record reports 1,425 camera downloads from ten observers and 207 iNaturalist uploads from twelve observers, with more than 115 species in the latter set. These are survey records that support the reserve’s knowledge base, rather than a census of all biodiversity or a measured climate-mitigation outcome. [C14, Event 13–18 October 2025]
Investigating geological carbon storage
UWC geoscience research investigates whether depleted reservoirs could provide suitable geological storage for carbon dioxide. A 2024 University account describes Blessing Afolayan’s doctoral work in the offshore Bredasdorp Basin, combining seismic information, well logs and geological data in three-dimensional models. The work examined potential storage locations, injection behaviour and trapping mechanisms, contributing to the scientific assessment needed before any practical storage project. [C16, Published 15 April 2024]
A related study by Luyanda Ngcobo, Blessing Afolayan and Mimonitu Opuwari was published online in June 2024 and included in a 2025 journal issue. It used logs, seismic lines and reports from three exploration wells to construct a static model and estimate storage using a compressibility approach. The model produced an estimated 0.64 million tonnes of capacity for the studied reservoir, with sensitivity to pore volume and water saturation. This is a site-specific modelling result. It does not represent carbon already captured or stored, and it cannot be credited against UWC’s operational emissions. [C17, Physical p.2 / journal p.784; online publication metadata p.1]
Understanding the health consequences of temperature extremes
Climate-health research at UWC also examines how temperature extremes affect cardiovascular wellbeing. In November 2025, the University reported a collaborative systematic review led by UWC-affiliated researcher Mamakase Grace Sello, with partners in South Africa, Lesotho and Uganda. The review considered 16 African studies and highlighted the need to integrate climate adaptation into health policy, improve preparedness and strengthen support for vulnerable populations. [C19, Supplied article pp.1–2; published 21 November 2025]
Published in Environmental Research in 2025, the review searched literature from January 1990 to October 2024. It found associations between both hot and cold exposure and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, with vulnerability shaped by age, sex, existing health conditions and social circumstances. Its conclusions call for further research to strengthen the evidence. These findings concern populations in the reviewed studies; they are not a UWC campus health survey, a single pooled risk estimate or proof that a particular adaptation intervention has already improved outcomes. [C21, Abstract; publisher and PubMed publication record]
Procurement Policy: environmental responsibility and application
Version C2025/01, Council amendment 27 March 2025. The original implementation date shown on the cover is 19 March 2008; section 3.1 below leaves the commencement date to Council. The complete selected provisions retain the policy’s scope, priority and permitted exceptions.
|
|
UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE
|
||
|
PROCUREMENT POLICY
|
Document Type
|
Policy
|
|
|
Council First Approval Ref Number
|
C2008/01
|
||
|
Implementation Date
|
19 March 2008
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment 1
|
C2012/01 (27 March 2012)
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment 2
|
C2016/01 (28 January 2016)
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment 3
|
C2020/03 (17 September 2020)
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment 4
|
C2025/01 (27 March 2025)
|
||
|
Policy Owner
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
||
|
Executive Management Portfolio
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
||
|
Policy Author
|
Procurement Manager
|
||
|
Contributors
|
Budget Owners, Legal, Senate Task Team, Internal and External Auditors, Policies from Other Universities, Procurement Committee, Council
|
||
|
Circulated by:
|
A Regal, J Thampi
|
||
|
Circulated to:
|
Procurement Committee
Executive Management |
||
UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN CAPE (UWC)
PROCUREMENT POLICY
Amended by Council, 27 March 2025 (C2025/01)
Amended by Council, 17 September 2020 (C2020/03)
Amended by Council, 28 January 2016 (C2016/01)
Amended by Council, 27 March 2012 (C2012/01)
Approved by Council, 19 March 2008 (C2008/01)
A place of quality, a place to grow, from hope to action through knowledge
2. POLICY STATEMENT: scope and selected environmental principle
The purpose of this Policy is to develop, implement and maintain sound and sustainable management of the procurement processes of the University by establishing principles, norms, standards and other requirements. This Policy applies to all procurement irrespective of the origin of the funds used.
The main principles identified are;
|
Commitment to Safety, Health and Environment (SHE)
|
The University is committed to the health and safety of its students, staff and its service providers in the Procurement Process. The University is committed to preservation of the environment, minimizing pollution and the improved use of natural resources in the application of its procurement processes.
|
[PL03, section 2 opening and complete SHE principle, physical pp. 11–12]
3. COMMENCEMENT AND APPLICATION
3.1 Commencement
This Policy shall come into effect on a date to be determined by Council, from which date all units of the University shall observe, implement and comply with the terms and conditions of this Policy.
3.2 Repeal of Policy dated September 2020
This Policy replaces the Procurement Policy Finance / C2020/2020 dated 17 September 2020, as amended.
3.3 Application
3.3.1 This Policy applies to the procurement of all Goods and Services for and on behalf of the University regardless of funding.
3.3.2 This Policy shall apply to all procurement by the University
3.3.3 This Policy prevails over all other policies related to the procurement of Goods and Services. Accordingly, all persons involved at various levels of the University in the procurement of Goods or Services shall –
3.3.3.1 interpret and apply this Policy congruently with any other policies of the University to the extent that such congruency is possible;
3.3.3.2 apply this Policy in preference to any other policies of the University in the event that ambiguity and/or conflict and/or vagueness exists between this Policy and other policies of the University.
3.3.3.3 apply the terms of this Policy as the minimum criteria required with respect to the procurement of Goods and Services, but may apply more stringent or specific criteria, provided that such criteria are reasonable and justified.
3.3.4 This Policy must be read in conjunction with all other University Policies, including, but not limited to:
• Budget Policy
• Fixed Asset Policy and Procedure
• Grants and Contracts Policy
• Travel Policy
• Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy
• Policy on Legal Matters and signing of Contracts and Agreements
Where the Procurement policy is in conflict with any other policy, the Procurement policy shall prevail on matters relating to Procurement.
3.3.5 Reasonable attempts shall be made by the University to ensure that other policies are aligned with the terms of this Policy.
3.3.6 The conditions, provisions, requirements or terms of this Policy may be relaxed for the purchase and renewal of software licenses of information resources (e.g. books and access to databases for the University’s Library Services), annual subscriptions and software licenses.
3.3.7 The conditions, provisions, requirements or terms of this Policy may be relaxed for the procurement of facilitators, tutors and highly technical specialised research material and equipment, publishers, transcriber, editors and the appointment of academic and professional consultants, subject to the proviso’s in 8.4 [PL03, section 3, physical pp. 13–14]
5. OVERSIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITIES
5.1 In terms of section 27(1) of the Higher Education Act (“The Act”), the Council must govern the University in accordance with the Act and the Institutional Statute.
5.2 The Council may delegate any of its powers and duties under the Act as set out therein to the other internal structures of the University, in terms of section 68(2) and other relevant sections of the Act.
5.3 All employees and agents of the University shall ensure that the terms and conditions set out in this Policy are observed at all times throughout the procurement process.
5.4 The responsibility for monitoring and managing the supply of Goods and Services by Suppliers/Service Providers rests with the department responsible for such Goods and Services. [PL03, section 5, physical p. 15]
8.4 Consultant-engagement condition referenced in 3.3.7
8.4 Consultants should only be engaged when the necessary skills and/or resources to perform a project, duty, study or other services are not available and the University cannot be reasonably expected either to train or to recruit people in the time available and further be monitored. [PL03, section 8.4, physical p. 18]
Open/download the complete Procurement Policy with Infrastructure Framework Addendum (PDF)
Supplier terms: safety and operational requirements
ANNEXURE “B”: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The following complete clauses form part of the published service-provider terms. The document body is undated; its file identifier is 20 February 2023. References to the agreement and SLA describe the contractual scope of these provisions.
14. Compliance with Procedures
14.1. It is recorded that during the term of the agreement, UWC or its appointed UWC Representative may implement certain reasonable procedures and policies. The Service Provider shall comply fully with any such reasonable procedures and policies, including the work procedures and health and safety procedures, provided that such policies and procedures shall have been provided to it in writing or is made accessible to the Service Provider.
14.2. The Service Provider shall ensure that it and its personnel shall at all times comply fully with any safety, fire, emergency and security procedures and policies applicable at UWC.
14.3. The Service Provider shall not transgress any rules, codes, policy documents, procedures and safety standards of UWC, which are available on request and of which the Service Provider must take notice.
14.4. Should UWC at any time believe that any member of the Service Provider’s personnel is failing to comply with any such procedures or policies, UWC shall be entitled to deny such staff member access to the relevant premises and require Service Provider to replace such person without delay.
14.5. The Service Provider shall keep safe any furniture and/or equipment and maintain and clean office, storage- and/or any change room facilities allocated by UWC to the Service Provider, in order to perform its duties.
14.6. The Service Provider and its staff shall not remove any property of UWC, or that of its employees, or its students from the premises of UWC without the written consent of UWC first being obtained.
14.7. The Service Provider and its staff shall abide by the security arrangements of UWC which may include any one or a combination of the following:-
14.7.1. body search;
14.7.2. presentation of personal identification documents or ID cards of UWC;
14.7.3. searching of personal bags / handbags /pockets / lockers;
14.7.4. finger printing;
14.7.5. any other lawful measure that may be required by the site concerned;
14.7.6. to hand in any lost item found to Campus Protection Services of UWC. [PL07, clause 14, physical pp. 8–9]
23. Compliance with Occupational Health and Safety
23.1. The Service Provider:-
23.1.1. warrants that it is fully aware of the terms and conditions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;
23.1.2. acknowledges that it is an employer in its own right with duties and responsibilities as prescribed in the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;
23.1.3. agrees to ensure that all Works/ Services shall be performed and all equipment shall be used in accordance with the provisions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended,
23.1.4. accepts accountability for its employees and sub-contractors to the extent that such employees and sub-contractors (including any other personnel) contravene the provisions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;
23.1.5. agrees to comply with all rules and regulations implemented by or on behalf of UWC on all sites relating to health and safety and will inform UWC immediately should Service Provider for any reason be unable to comply with the provisions of the OHS Act and such rules and regulations;
23.1.6. shall appoint a duly authorised representative to ensure the discharge of its duties in terms of Section 16(1) and (2) of the OHS Act for the term of the SLA;
23.1.7. shall ensure that all workers are familiar with UWC’s emergency evacuation program and that the correct emergency procedures will be followed in the event of an emergency situation or when an exercise is held.
23.2. In terms of Section 37(2) of the OHS Act, the following is hereby agreed:
23.2.1. the Service Provider shall be responsible for the implementation of the terms and provisions of the OHS Act and Regulations as amended in the area where the work/service is to be undertaken for UWC.
23.3. The Service Provider shall be responsible for the wellbeing, in relation to health and safety of all persons coming into such area in accordance with the OHS Act, subject to any directives issued by management of UWC. The Service Provider undertake to report to the Risk and Compliance Director of UWC any hazard to health and safety which exists or arises during the contract works or services in the area concerned, and over which the Service Provider has no control. The Service Provider shall issue all appropriate safety/health equipment to all persons working or coming into the area. The Service Provider furthermore agrees to specifically abide by and implement the provisions contained in UWC Safety Policy and the OHS Act.
23.4. In the event that any Regulations or State of Disaster and/or UWC Policy regarding any Pandemic be implemented, the Service Provider accepts and undertakes to strictly comply with the protocols and procedures of UWC and indemnify and holds UWC harmless against any claim flowing from any infection and/or in the event that any person, client, employee, agent, manager, or subcontractor fails to comply with any aspect of the National and/or UWC Covid-19 protocols and procedures. [PL07, clause 23, physical pp. 13–14]
References
[C01] University of the Western Cape. Council approval 22 September 2022; implementation 23 September 2022. Infrastructure Management Policy.
[C02] University of the Western Cape. Reporting year 2024; Council sustainability statement approved 26 June 2025; 152-page edition. UWC Annual Report 2024, designed 152-page edition.
[C03] University of the Western Cape. 4 October 2024. UWC 14/2024: Installation of Sustainable Energy Security Infrastructure.
[C04] University of the Western Cape. 7 July 2025. UWC Signs Landmark MOU to Launch Comprehensive Clean Energy Security Solution.
[C05] University of the Western Cape. 16 April 2025. A Green New World Loading at UWC.
[C06] University of the Western Cape. Reporting year 2025; signed report finalised in 2026. UWC Annual Report 2025, signed report.
[C08] University of the Western Cape. 7 March 2024. Be energy wise! #TurnItOff.
[C09] University of the Western Cape. 15 July 2025. Power The Change Social Media Competition.
[C10] Harriet Box. 2019-08-30. UWC implements game changers to become responsible global citizens with its water-wise programme.
[C11] Harriet Box, Institutional Advancement. 14 February 2025. UWC A Proud Participant in Conserving Threatened Wetlands.
[C12] University of the Western Cape. Undated webpage; supplied capture created 13 October 2026. UWC Nature Reserve Unit: overview.
[C13] UWC Nature Reserve Unit. 11 February 2025. Nature Reserve Unit Faunal Survey reveals impressive results.
[C14] UWC Nature Reserve Unit. 12 December 2025. Nature Reserve Unit Biodiversity Survey reveals impressive results.
[C16] Nathan Adams, UWC Institutional Advancement. 15 April 2024. UWC researcher does groundbreaking research on carbon dioxide storage.
[C17] Luyanda Ngcobo, Blessing Afolayan and Mimonitu Opuwari. Online 22 June 2024; journal volume 43(5), 2025, pp.784–799. Evaluation of carbon dioxide storage potential in wells of the Bredasdorp Basin offshore South Africa.
[E01] Dullah Omar Institute. 2024 reporting year; later public report. Dullah Omar Institute Annual Report 2024.
[E02] Nathan Adams, Institutional Advancement. 22 August 2025. UWC Community Leaders Conversational Training Workshop On Children’s Rights And Climate Change.
[E03] Nathan Adams. 10 July 2025. Prioritising Children’s Rights in Regional Climate Change Action.
[E04] SADC Parliamentary Forum. 2 July 2025. SADC Regional seminar spotlights children’s rights in climate crisis.
[E05] UWC School of Public Health. October 2025 invitation. Climate Change and Health for Frontline Health Workers.
[E06] South African Medical Research Council, Environment and Health Research Unit. 2025 activity section; continuously updated webpage. The EHRU out and about: 2025 UWC frontline-worker climate-health course.
[E07] Danielly de P. Magalhães and coauthors. 15 October 2025. Improving health professionals’ capacity to respond to the climate crisis in Africa: outcomes of the Africa climate and health responder course.
[E08] University of the Western Cape. 2025 academic year. Faculty of Law 2025 calendar: Climate Law and Governance 818, printed pp. 229–231.
[E09] University of the Western Cape. 2024 academic year. 2024 LLM Environment Law programme modules.
[E10] Institutional Advancement. 5 September 2024. UWC hosts conversation: SA’s New Climate Change Act – A Landmark Step Towards Environmental Sustainability.
[E11] SANORD / UWC. Conference 4–6 December 2024; programme overview. 16th SANORD International Conference: official programme overview.
[E12] Tamara Goliath, DVC: Research and Innovation Office. 10 December 2024. UWC Hosts a Southern African-Nordic 2024 International Conference to Spark Global Collaboration.
[E13] University of the Western Cape. 25 September 2024. Seeds of Change: Cultivating Innovation for Sustainable Futures through Research Week.
[E14] Tamara Goliath, Office of the DVC: Research and Innovation. 11 September 2025. Bridges Of Knowledge: Building Research Ecosystems For Global Collaboration.
[E15] Tamara Goliath, DVC: Research and Innovation Office. 12 July 2024. EnergyWaterFoodClimate Nexus International Summit 2024.
[E16] Shelley Christians, Institutional Advancement. 9 April 2025. Life-Size Puppets Lead a Global Stampede for Climate Action.
[E17] The Walk Productions. Undated current project website, accessed 13 October 2026. THE HERDS: the completed first journey.
[E18] The Walk Productions; Jessica Dives, Diala Brisly, Rachel Wild and collaborators. Copyright 2025; page undated. THE HERDS: Let the Wildness In education programme.
[E19] Timothy G. Harrison and coauthors. 3 April 2025 online; May 2025 issue. A Pollutant’s Tale: An Interactive Talk on the Chemistry of the Earth’s Climate and Its Response to Pollutants.
[E20] Nicklaus Kruger. 2 August 2019. Combating Climate Change With Cutting-Edge Science: UWC Celebrates National Science Week 2019.
[E21] Tshiamo Moleele. 30 August 2021. Exploring an African Perspective on Climate Change.
[E22] University of the Western Cape. 18 March 2019. Upcoming UWC Green Campaigns.
[E23] Nathan Adams. 19 May 2025. Research for Improving Water Security.
[P01] Association for Water and Rural Development (AWARD). Undated retrospective; completion date 31 May 2025. The Giyani Local Scale Climate Resilience Programme (GLSCRP).
[P02] GLSCRP / AWARD, WRC and implementing partners. November 2024 filename and PDF creation metadata; publicly hosted July 2025 path. Guidelines for Water Use in Giyani: Improving Water Use Management.
[P03] Nebojša Jovanovic, Mandelwa Mpambo, Alana Willoughby and colleagues. 2023. Feasibility of Solar-Powered Groundwater Pumping Systems in Rural Areas of Greater Giyani Municipality (Limpopo, South Africa).
[P04] Nebo Jovanovic, Seemole Shika, Eugene Maswanganye and Munashe Mashabatu; Water & Sanitation Africa. May/June 2024. Performance assessment of solar-powered groundwater pumping systems in rural areas of Greater Giyani Municipality (Limpopo): WISA 2024 oral-presentation abstract.
[P05] Water Research Commission; sponsor-authored partner content in Mail & Guardian. 28 July 2025. The Giyani Local Scale Climate Resilience Programme: Building Climate Resilience Through Water Innovation.
[P06] Harriet Box, UWC Institutional Advancement. 1 March 2023. UWC partners with and advises emerging farmers on climate resilience.
[P07] UWC Politics and Urban Governance Research Group (PUG). Undated project page with dated 2025 and 2026 updates. Governing the Just Urban Transition.
[P08] Christina Culwick Fatti, Fiona Anciano, Charlotte Lemanski and Margot Rubin; South African Cities Network. August 2023 report; public copy hosted September 2024 path. Governance of the Just Urban Transition.
[P09] UWC PUG. Event date: 22 July 2024; current webpage publication date unstated. Off-Grid Cities and Governance of the Just Urban Transition Knowledge Exchange.
[P10] Gauteng City-Region Observatory. Undated project page with dated 2023–2024 activity. Off-grid cities: Elite infrastructural secession and social justice.
[P11] Gauteng City-Region Observatory. 30 September 2024. Joint UCL-STEaPP and GCRO project on Nature-Based Solutions For Urban Water Management.
[P12] Nathan Adams, UWC. 5 August 2025. Using Technology To Predict, Assess And Manage Flooding: A Call For Smarter Policies And Integrated Solutions.
[P13] Sibuyisele S. Pakati, Cletah Shoko and Timothy Dube. Published online 24 July 2025; repository available 6 November 2025. Integrated flood modelling and risk assessment in urban areas: A review on applications, strengths, limitations and future research directions.
[P14] Sibuyisele S. Pakati, Cletah Shoko and Timothy Dube. Online 29 August 2025; November 2025 issue. Earth observation-based analysis of flood extent and impacts on land use and cover in the Cape Town Metropolitan Region, South Africa.
[P15] Nadia Wessels, Nadia Sitas, Patrick O’Farrell and Karen J. Esler. First online 19 December 2023; People and Nature 6(1), 2024. Inclusion of ecosystem services in the management of municipal natural open space systems.
[P16] Quinton Mtyala, UWC Institutional Advancement. 11 March 2025. UWC Landscape Ecologist Warns of Ecosystem Service Loss and Urban Development Challenges in South Africa.
[P17] Western Cape Department of Agriculture. September 2025 edition; posted in October 2025 directory. SmartAgri Barometer, Edition 2, 2025/2026: MCAP Mini-Sprint Projects.
[P18] UCT Marine and Antarctic Research for Innovation and Sustainability (MARIS). Undated retrospective project account. Projects: Eco-ACE.
[P19] Louise C. Gammage, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Lynne Shannon and the Eco-ACE team. MSEAS 2024. Building adaptive capacity to ocean change by promoting ecosystem-based adaptation and community engagement.
[P20] King’s College London. Undated institutional grant record. Transforming places for the precariously housed: Equitable adaptation pathways for climate mobilities.
[P21] Phillan Zamchiya and Charity Rusere; PLAAS, University of the Western Cape. November 2025. Land availability and land-use changes in Africa, Research Report 60.
[P22] Phillan Zamchiya, PLAAS. 17 December 2024; page also shows update 13 June 2025. Cattle herders and the ‘green struggles’ in Senegal.
[P23] PLAAS; report by Andrew Bennie. 10 November 2022; updated 16 November 2022. Climate Change and Rural Livelihoods in Southern Africa: An Agenda for Policy-Oriented Research.
[P24] Quinton Mtyala, UWC Institutional Advancement. 13 October 2025. PLAAS Marks 30 Years With Conference On Land, Life, And Justice.
[PL03] University of the Western Cape. Main amendment 27 March 2025; addendum approved 28 June 2018. Procurement Policy with Infrastructure Framework Addendum.
[PL07] University of the Western Cape. Undated body; filename 20 February 2023; PDF creation 24 February 2023. Annexure B General Terms and Conditions and Operational Requirements.
[C18] Government of South Africa. Act 34 of 2008; official title verified 13 October 2026. National Energy Act 34 of 2008.
[C19] Sipokazi Fokazi, UWC Institutional Advancement. 21 November 2025. Sudden Weather Changes Spike Heart and Stroke Risks.
[C20] University of the Western Cape. 4 December 2025. Prof Ralarala displays UWC’s excellence at UNECA’s Conference on Land Policy in Africa 2025.
[C21] Mamakase G. Sello and colleagues. Online 9 September 2025; Environmental Research 286, Part 1, 1 December 2025, 122812. A systematic review assessing the association between extreme temperature exposure and cardiovascular health outcomes in Africa.
[N01] Western Cape Department of Agriculture. December 2025. SmartAgri Barometer, December 2025: MCAP projects.
[N02] Network of Excellence on Land Governance in Africa. 2 May 2025. Building Climate-Responsive Land Governance in Africa.
[N03] PLAAS, University of the Western Cape. Course 29–30 April 2025. NELGA Climate Change and Land Governance in Africa 2025.
[A01] Association for Water and Rural Development. Undated institutional page; accessed 15 October 2026. About AWARD.
[D01] Dullah Omar Institute, University of the Western Cape. Reporting year 2025; report finalised in 2026. Dullah Omar Institute Annual Report 2025.

