SDG 15: Life on Land | 2025
Land conservation and education
Conservation events, practical biodiversity learning, sustainable agriculture and tourism exchange.
Land stewardship and biodiversity
Campus conservation, species records, planning, invasive-plant management and community partnerships.
Land-sensitive waste and pollution
The environmental, water and contractor responsibilities retained in UWC’s published governance documents.
SDG icon: United Nations. UN logo and icon guidelines (PDF).
The content of this publication has not been approved by the United Nations and does not reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States.
The University of the Western Cape connects the protection of threatened habitats with research, education and partnerships for sustainable land use. Its Cape Flats Nature Reserve provides a place for species monitoring, ecological learning and community participation. Work across conservation science, land governance and agriculture extends that contribution beyond campus. This account presents activities and research from 2025 alongside clearly dated earlier work and the institutional provisions that support land stewardship.
Land conservation and education
Supporting land ecosystems through education
Events for conservation and sustainable land use
UWC’s Nature to Nurture exhibition opened in May 2025, connecting biodiversity observation with creative learning. PLAAS’s dated masterclasses, Living Landscapes training and October 2025 Land, Life and Society conference bring conservation, land rights and livelihoods into public and professional discussion. The full accounts retain advertised and confirmed activity separately. [E29] [E31]
Evidence and context
Learning about biodiversity through art and community access
Nature to Nurture: from a 2024 learner visit to a 2025 exhibition
The UWC Nature Reserve Unit and the Zeitz MOCAA BMW Centre for Art Education linked biodiversity learning with photography in a collaboration launched in 2024. MOCAA Art Club learners visited the Cape Flats Nature Reserve later that year, recording their encounters with the natural environment using disposable cameras. For some, this was their first experience of a nature reserve. Their photographs were exhibited alongside work by UWC students at Zeitz MOCAA, where the inaugural exhibition opened on 10 May 2025. The university’s nature-photography competition attracted more than 90 entries, with 24 selected for exhibition. Images of a carpenter bee, a snail shell and a dragonfly placed everyday encounters with wildlife at the centre of the project. The collaboration created a route into biodiversity awareness for school learners, students, families and museum visitors, connecting close observation of living species with creative expression. [E29, Article body, launch chronology and MOCAA learner paragraph; article PDF]

A visitor views photographs at the Nature to Nurture exhibition at Zeitz MOCAA, which opened on 10 May 2025. The photograph’s exact capture day is unspecified. Credit: Photographer not credited; UWC source credits “Supplied”. Image source.
Documenting the school learners’ experience
The collaborators’ 2025 EEASA conference abstract dates the school learners’ reserve visit more precisely to December 2024 and records 99 competition submissions. It describes the exhibition as a joint environmental- and art-education activity that introduced learners to species and habitats they had not previously encountered. [E30, Physical PDF page 79, abstract beginning Nature to Nurture]
Practical conservation skills and community education
UWC’s 2025 Fynbos Forum contribution describes conservation education that connects the Cape Flats Nature Reserve with students and communities. Annual student practicals combine alien-vegetation clearing in designated areas with long-term monitoring of alien-vegetation density, supporting an active volunteer skills-training programme. Partnerships with the South African Education Programme and Zeitz MOCAA provide school learners with environmental education and career guidance. The reserve’s nursery encourages indigenous planting in gardens, while guided walks support public appreciation of local biodiversity. [E28, Printed page 88, abstract by Laurenda van Breda]
Continuing land and conservation education in 2025
Conservation, rights and access masterclass
PLAAS advertised an online Living Landscapes masterclass for 12 June 2025 with Professor Thembela Kepe of the University of Toronto. The planned session addressed conservation, land rights, livelihoods and access in Southern Africa. It invited participants to reflect on efforts to address exclusionary conservation histories and to bring examples from their own settings into discussion. The programme linked international academic expertise with practical questions facing communities and conservation professionals. [E23, Article body]
A 2025 masterclass connecting biodiversity and climate
PLAAS held a Living Landscapes in Action masterclass with Kumi Naidoo on 15 October 2025. In a reflection published after the event, Naidoo discussed ecological farming, agroecology and equitable land-based conservation as responses to connected biodiversity and climate pressures. The publication extends public access to his perspectives on conservation and livelihoods. [E35, dated article and closing event note]
Further Living Landscapes training
For 27–31 October 2025, PLAAS offered a further five-day, in-person Living Landscapes course in Cape Town. The advertised programme covered conservation history, political ecology, alternative conservation approaches and the relationships between biodiversity, livelihoods and rights, with a proposed field visit to connect discussion to local landscapes. It invited applicants from government, conservation organisations, community-based organisations and related professional settings across Africa. The call described the course as fully funded for a limited, selected group and required a learning portfolio and field report for completion. [E24, Article body]
Land, Life and Society: an international conversation in 2025
Thirty years of PLAAS research and public engagement
PLAAS marked its thirtieth anniversary with the Land, Life and Society conference from 7 to 9 October 2025. More than 250 academics, researchers, civil-society partners and supporters gathered to examine land rights, inequality and environmental change. Discussions connected land redistribution and Indigenous land struggles with the effects of industrial farming and extraction, small-scale fisheries, critical minerals and the green economy. The programme included ten simultaneous discussions and a field trip for international delegates. South Africa’s Minister of Land Reform and Rural Development and Colombia’s Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development contributed to the event, placing the exchange within an international policy conversation. Delegates debated a Cape Town Declaration, with a final version drafted on 10 October. The conference provides a substantial example of UWC convening research and public dialogue around the relationship between land, livelihoods and ecosystems. [E31, Article body, participant count, themes and final paragraphs; article PDF]

Delegates at the PLAAS Land, Life and Society conference, held from 7 to 9 October 2025. The photograph’s exact capture day is unspecified. Credit: Jesi Townsend / UWC. Image source.
A public archive for continued learning
PLAAS’s conference archive extends access to the 2025 Land, Life and Society discussions through public plenary recordings, daily summaries, newsletters and the Cape Town Declaration. These materials provide a continuing resource for readers interested in agrarian change, land governance and environmental justice. Public access to these resources should be distinguished from participation in the conference’s closed discussion sessions. [E25, Article body]
Sustainable campus food: procurement context
UWC’s Procurement Policy includes environmental preservation, pollution minimisation and improved use of natural resources within its purchasing principles. The complete selected provisions retain the March 2025 amendment and its separate commencement qualification. The campus garden and community-growing accounts appear in the agricultural-learning section. [PX01]
Evidence and context
Environmental principles in purchasing
The Procurement Policy amended on 27 March 2025 includes environmental preservation, pollution minimisation and improved use of natural resources among its purchasing principles. Clause 3.2 replaces the September 2020 policy, while clause 3.1 leaves commencement to Council. A separate commencement date for the March 2025 amendment is not stated in this edition. [PX01, Cover; section 2 SHE principle; section 3.1 commencement; physical pp.1,12–13]
PROCUREMENT POLICY: source provisions
This is the edition amended by Council on 27 March 2025. Its original implementation date of 19 March 2008 is distinct from commencement of the amendment, which section 3.1 leaves to Council.
UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE / PROCUREMENT POLICY
|
|
UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE
|
||
|
PROCUREMENT POLICY
|
Document Type
|
Policy
|
|
|
Council First Approval Ref Number
|
C2008/01
|
||
|
Implementation Date
|
19 March 2008
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment 1
|
C2012/01 (27 March 2012)
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment 2
|
C2016/01 (28 January 2016)
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment 3
|
C2020/03 (17 September 2020)
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment 4
|
C2025/01 (27 March 2025)
|
||
|
Policy Owner
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
||
|
Executive Management Portfolio
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
||
|
Policy Author
|
Procurement Manager
|
||
|
Contributors
|
Budget Owners, Legal, Senate Task Team, Internal and External Auditors, Policies from Other Universities, Procurement Committee, Council
|
||
|
Circulated by:
|
A Regal, J Thampi
|
||
|
Circulated to:
|
Procurement Committee Executive Management
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN CAPE (UWC)
PROCUREMENT POLICY
Amended by Council, 27 March 2025 (C2025/01)
Amended by Council, 17 September 2020 (C2020/03)
Amended by Council, 28 January 2016 (C2016/01)
Amended by Council, 27 March 2012 (C2012/01)
Approved by Council, 19 March 2008 (C2008/01)
A place of quality, a place to grow, from hope to action through knowledge
2. POLICY STATEMENT
The purpose of this Policy is to develop, implement and maintain sound and sustainable management of the procurement processes of the University by establishing principles, norms, standards and other requirements. This Policy applies to all procurement irrespective of the origin of the funds used.
The main principles identified are;
|
Effectiveness
|
Govern and regulate the purchase of Goods and Services in a manner to best serve the University’s mission, and operational and strategic activities;
|
|
Transparency
|
Ensure transparency and accountability, and establish appropriate lines of responsibility in the procurement processes and the financial affairs of the University;
|
|
Best Value for Money
|
Accord with prescribed standards and specifications in a manner that will not compromise the quality of Goods procured and the efficiency of Services rendered to the University community, while realising the best value for money, minimizing risk and safeguarding the University’s interest;
|
|
Fairness
|
All service providers shall be dealt with fairly and without unfair discrimination.
|
|
Efficiency
|
The policy and processes shall not impede he operational and strategic activities of the University.
|
|
Responsibility and Accountability
|
Outline the role and responsibilities of all parties involved in the procurement process as identified in this Policy.
|
|
Co-Ordination and Optimization
|
Foster greater optimization of purchasing by the University community and thereby enhancing efficiency in using financial and other resources to the benefit of all;
|
|
Corporate Governance
|
Enhance and promote good corporate governance principles at all levels and within all structures of the University; and ensure compliance with all relevant legislation that govern the procurement of Goods and Services.
|
|
Collaborative Procurement
|
Promotion of collaborative contracts with external entities with whom the University has a common interest. Optimize collaboration with other Regional Universities, Cape Higher Educational Procurement Consortia, (CHEC), and other initiatives that might benefit the University.
|
|
Commitment to Safety, Health and Environment (SHE)
|
The University is committed to the health and safety of its students, staff and its service providers in the Procurement Process. The University is committed to preservation of the environment, minimizing pollution and the improved use of natural resources in the application of its procurement processes.
|
|
Transformation and Development
|
Support national, provincial and regional mandates relating to Transformation, Supplier Development and Community Development.
|
|
Student Entrepreneurship
|
Create designated and regulated environments that support the nurture and development of University student entrepreneurship initiatives, within the rules of the Higher Education Act and other applicable legislation.
|
[PX01, section 2; physical PDF pages 11, 12]
3. COMMENCEMENT AND APPLICATION
3.1 Commencement
This Policy shall come into effect on a date to be determined by Council, from which date all units of the University shall observe, implement and comply with the terms and conditions of this Policy.
3.2 Repeal of Policy dated September 2020
This Policy replaces the Procurement Policy Finance / C2020/2020 dated 17 September 2020, as amended.
3.3 Application
3.3.1 This Policy applies to the procurement of all Goods and Services for and on behalf of the University regardless of funding.
3.3.2 This Policy shall apply to all procurement by the University
3.3.3 This Policy prevails over all other policies related to the procurement of Goods and Services. Accordingly, all persons involved at various levels of the University in the procurement of Goods or Services shall –
3.3.3.1 interpret and apply this Policy congruently with any other policies of the University to the extent that such congruency is possible;
3.3.3.2 apply this Policy in preference to any other policies of the University in the event that ambiguity and/or conflict and/or vagueness exists between this Policy and other policies of the University.
3.3.3.3 apply the terms of this Policy as the minimum criteria required with respect to the procurement of Goods and Services, but may apply more stringent or specific criteria, provided that such criteria are reasonable and justified.
3.3.4 This Policy must be read in conjunction with all other University Policies, including, but not limited to:
• Budget Policy
• Fixed Asset Policy and Procedure
• Grants and Contracts Policy
• Travel Policy
• Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy
• Policy on Legal Matters and signing of Contracts and Agreements
Where the Procurement policy is in conflict with any other policy, the Procurement policy shall prevail on matters relating to Procurement.
3.3.5 Reasonable attempts shall be made by the University to ensure that other policies are aligned with the terms of this Policy.
3.3.6 The conditions, provisions, requirements or terms of this Policy may be relaxed for the purchase and renewal of software licenses of information resources (e.g. books and access to databases for the University’s Library Services), annual subscriptions and software licenses.
3.3.7 The conditions, provisions, requirements or terms of this Policy may be relaxed for the procurement of facilitators, tutors and highly technical specialised research material and equipment, publishers, transcriber, editors and the appointment of academic and professional consultants, subject to the proviso’s in 8.4
[PX01, section 3; physical PDF pages 13, 14]
Open/download the complete Procurement Policy with Infrastructure Framework Addendum (PDF)
Maintaining ecosystems and biodiversity
UWC manages the Cape Flats Nature Reserve, protecting threatened lowland vegetation and seasonal wetlands. Its wider research examines wildlife connectivity, genetic diversity, regional biodiversity and rangeland change. The complete evidence distinguishes documented observations, ecological planning and research recommendations from completed restoration or population recovery. [B01] [B09]
Evidence and context
Protecting a living landscape on campus
A reserve in the city
UWC owns and manages the 34-hectare Cape Flats Nature Reserve, a remnant of two threatened lowland vegetation types: Cape Flats Dune Strandveld and Cape Flats Sand Fynbos. Its dunes, flatlands and seasonal wetland provide habitat within an urban campus. Established as a reserve in 1977 and declared a National Monument in 1978, the site is now described by UWC as a Provincial Heritage site. The Nature Reserve Unit combines conservation management with an indigenous nursery, environmental education and ecological research. [B01, Overview: reserve history, ecosystems and unit role]
Tracking biodiversity carefully
UWC’s February 2025 report recorded a reserve species inventory of 769, compared with 558 documented in 2023. Its category totals were 130 birds, 270 plants, 62 fungi/lichens/mosses/liverworts, 246 insects/arachnids, 27 mammals and 34 reptiles/amphibians. These are records of documented diversity, rather than evidence that animal populations grew or that 769 species were seen during one event. The article identifies two Endangered, three Vulnerable and nine Near Threatened plant species. Keeping these categories distinct matters: Near Threatened species are of conservation concern but do not belong to the formal threatened categories. [B02, Article PDF, p. 1; category list and conservation-status paragraph]

Southern masked weaver beside its woven nest, published with UWC’s February 2025 biodiversity-inventory story. The photograph’s capture date is unverified. Credit: UWC Nature Reserve; individual photographer not credited. Image source.
Managing habitat, water and fire
Seasonal wetland habitat
Heavy winter rain in 2024 brought the reserve’s seasonal wetland into prominence again. UWC’s February 2025 account describes aquatic and semi-aquatic habitat, including frogs, waterbirds and the flowering bulb Gladiolus angustus. A camera trap recorded a marsh mongoose in November 2024, adding evidence of wildlife use of the site. The reserve’s wetland was created in 1977, and its conservation team links protection and environmental education to the habitat, flood-buffering and groundwater functions of wetlands. Seasonal filling and individual wildlife detections are valuable observations, rather than measurements of restored area or population recovery. [B05, Wetland history, winter 2024 description and camera-record chronology]

Seasonal wetland habitat at the Cape Flats Nature Reserve, accompanying UWC’s February 2025 account of earlier observations. The photograph’s capture date is unverified. Credit: Photographer not credited on source page; supplied by UWC. Image source.
Planning ecological fire management
A prescribed-burn plan prepared for UWC by the Cape Peninsula Fire Protection Association on 20 February 2023 proposed a 6.5-hectare ecological burn in Cape Flats Dune Strandveld. Its objectives included removing ageing vegetation, lowering fuel loads and encouraging indigenous vegetation to re-establish. The plan describes regular alien-plant clearing, perimeter vegetation clearing and firebreak preparation. It also sets weather limits, smoke considerations and go/no-go checks. The accompanying UWC notice explained that the selected area had not burnt for nearly 40 years. These documents show site-specific ecological and safety planning; the published plan leaves the actual burn date and after-action review blank and does not establish that the proposed burn was completed. [B06, pp 1,4,6–8,13–15] [B07, Announcement dated 31 March 2023]
Conserving wildlife across working landscapes
A 2025 leopard record on the West Coast
A camera-trap survey involving the Landmark Foundation, SANParks, UWC and participating landowners recorded a leopard in West Coast National Park, reported by UWC in November 2025 as the first sighting there in 170 years. Principal investigator Dr Jeannine McManus is a research fellow in UWC’s Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Department. The partnership studies ecological connectivity and leopard occurrence across landscapes where conservation areas sit alongside farming and development. UWC’s contribution centres on scientific evidence that can inform conservation action and policy. The record is evidence of a leopard’s presence; longer-term monitoring is needed before drawing conclusions about residency, breeding or population recovery. [B09, Article; camera-trap partnership and McManus statements]

A camera-trap photograph of a leopard at West Coast National Park. The camera overlay records 23 May 2025 at 23:10; UWC reported the sighting in November 2025. Credit: Landmark Foundation. Image source.
Learning from natural recolonisation
A 2024 study by UWC-affiliated researchers and conservation partners examined the return of leopards to the Piketberg after a long local absence. Camera-trap surveys ran from August 2020 to April 2021 and August 2022 to May 2023, alongside analysis of historical destruction permits. Researchers used coat patterns to identify individual adults and spatial capture–recapture models to estimate density. The findings connected recolonisation with a changing landscape: less lethal predator control, changes from livestock to crop production, and increased tolerance of carnivores. The study stresses the importance of private land, connected habitat and non-lethal coexistence approaches. Participating landowners provided access and CapeNature shared records and access to managed areas. Its recommendations support conservation planning; they are not proof that every proposed corridor or intervention has been implemented. [B10, Methods 2.2; discussion 4.1–4.2; acknowledgments, pp 276,282–284]

Two camera-trap views of the same leopard and matching coat markings in Figure 2 of the Piketberg study, published in 2024. The surveys ran in 2020–2021 and 2022–2023; the photographs’ capture dates are unspecified. Credit: Jeannine McManus and co-authors, 2024. Figure 2, CC BY 4.0. Unchanged. Image source. CC BY 4.0.
Genetic diversity beyond visible differences
UWC research fellow Jeannine McManus also co-authored a leopard-genomics study published online in December 2024 and in Evolution’s March 2025 issue. Comparing red, captive black and normally coloured leopards, the researchers explored how coat-colour variation relates to genetic diversity. The sampled captive black leopard showed strong signals consistent with inbreeding, while the red leopards carried potentially harmful variants. The work adds genetic evidence to conservation discussions and illustrates why visible colour differences alone cannot define separate conservation populations. These findings apply to the sampled animals and should not be generalised to all wild leopards of a given colour. [B11, Abstract and author affiliations; online and issue dates]
Research for effective biodiversity management
African expertise in biodiversity data
The 2024 bii4africa dataset brought together 200 experts to estimate how major land uses affect terrestrial vertebrates and vascular plants across sub-Saharan Africa. UWC’s Bryan Maritz coordinated reptiles and amphibians; Andrew A. Turner also contributed with a UWC affiliation. The structured process asked specialists to estimate abundance relative to an intact reference population and refine their judgements through discussion. The resulting dataset represents approximately 5,400 vertebrate and 45,000 plant species and can support ecosystem-condition assessment, conservation prioritisation and restoration research. Its openly published methods and data help address geographic and taxonomic gaps in biodiversity knowledge. [B13, Abstract, Methods and author contributions]
From data to regional conservation choices
A subsequent Nature assessment published online on 3 December 2025 combined this expert knowledge with spatial land-use data. It estimated that indigenous plant and vertebrate populations in sub-Saharan Africa retained an average 76% of their reference abundance, with substantial variation among species groups and landscapes. This is an abundance-based index, not a count of species lost. The study highlighted the importance of relatively untransformed rangelands and natural forests outside protected areas, alongside formal conservation areas. The journal issue is dated January 2026; the research was publicly available during 2025. [B14, Abstract; regional results; publication history]
Recognising overlooked species
UWC’s December 2025 account of the project describes Maritz’s coordination of experts assessing 799 amphibian and 1,481 reptile species. Bringing these groups into the assessment broadens the evidence available for conservation planning beyond large mammals. The emphasis on working landscapes also connects biodiversity research to agricultural land use, community stewardship and the practical choices that determine whether people and wildlife can coexist. [B15, Maritz role and expert-network description]
Research to guide land and species management
Mapping long term change in savannah rangelands
A 2024 study involving UWC researchers examined bush encroachment in southern Kruger National Park and neighbouring communities using satellite records from 1992 to 2022. The team combined climatic and terrain information with machine-learning classification to investigate changes in vegetation cover. The work provides a spatial evidence base for rangeland management and biodiversity conservation across protected and community landscapes. Its contribution is the identification and mapping of ecological change; the study does not demonstrate that UWC implemented a clearing programme or restored the mapped land. [T01]
Anticipating future pressure on protected and communal land
Research published in February 2025 brought UWC scientists together with colleagues from other universities and South African National Parks to model woody-plant encroachment in protected and communal landscapes. The study considered locations in Kruger National Park and the Bushbuckridge area, comparing present conditions with alternative future climate scenarios. Models indicated greater areas suitable for encroachment under the high-emissions scenario. These projections help identify where proactive land management may be needed, while retaining uncertainty about future conditions. The study focuses on native woody species spreading within savannah rangelands. [T02]
Community education about ecosystems
The reserve’s annual surveys involve learners, specialists and local communities in biodiversity recording. UWC also connects ecology and place with community arts and documentary storytelling. The retained accounts identify the distinct 2024 and 2025 activities, participant groups and observation methods. [B03] [B04]
Evidence and context
Community science that strengthens conservation
The 2024 survey
From 14 to 19 October 2024, the Cape Flats Nature Reserve’s annual survey brought together 198 participants. UWC staff and students from 10 departments worked alongside biodiversity specialists from the Endangered Wildlife Trust, Cape Peninsula University of Technology and Biodiversity and Development Institute, together with experienced community members. Learners from Nature Connect’s Conservation Leadership Programme and Meridian Pinehurst High School also participated. The event generated 3,143 photographs: 2,374 in a shared collection and 769 through iNaturalist. The unit reported 273 species seen during the six days. Combining expertise, photographs and public participation helps update the reserve’s biodiversity records while giving learners direct experience of conservation fieldwork. The newsletter describes 162 Sherman traps used over six nights, with four small-mammal species recorded, including a new reserve record of the greater red musk shrew. Camera monitoring confirmed a caracal after the event. [B03, Opening four paragraphs and 2024 survey newsletter, p. 1; posted 11 February 2025]
The 2025 survey
The next survey ran from 13 to 18 October 2025, with 108 participants drawn from schools, clubs and local communities. The unit reported 1,425 camera downloads from 10 observers, plus 207 iNaturalist uploads from 12 observers documenting more than 115 species. Its December 2025 account connects this collective recording effort to protecting the reserve’s threatened Strandveld and Sand Fynbos. These figures describe different observation channels and should not be interpreted as a like-for-like biodiversity trend against 2024. [B04, Opening report; posted 12 December 2025]
Making biodiversity records accessible
The Nature Reserve Unit publishes a species-resource hub covering plants, mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and several invertebrate and non-flowering groups. Downloadable lists and linked photo collections support identification and public engagement. The resources are updated over time, so their current versions do not necessarily reproduce the lists available during 2024 or 2025. [B08, Species-list hub and downloadable flora filename]
Arts, place and environmental understanding
Rural arts education and community partnerships
UWC’s Centre for Humanities Research works with community arts partners to connect cultural learning with questions of ecology and place. At Boschendal’s Heritage Day festivities on 24 September 2024, learners took part in puppet-making activities and a giant-puppet parade. Workshops involved children from Languedoc and Pniel and drew on collaborations with Boschendal Education, Net vir Pret and Ukwanda Puppets and Designs. The programme is part of a longer network of public arts work that explores conservation, ecology, community and culture, bringing university-based creative practice into conversation with rural communities. [E12, Article body]
Documentary storytelling about land and environmental justice
UWC researcher and filmmaker Dr Jacob Cloete’s documentary Steek My Weg / Hidden Away explores the relationship between environmental conservation and social justice in Barrydale. In December 2024, UWC announced Cape Town TV broadcasts of the film. The project grew from conversations with the Hessequa community about land displacement and the environmental effects of large agricultural developments. Its origins were connected to the community’s River and Redfin puppet parade, supported by UWC’s Centre for Humanities Research and local arts partners. The film offers an additional route for public learning about land, history and ecological relationships. [E13, Article body]
Learning about sustainable agricultural land use
UWC’s community gardening partnerships share planting, propagation and worm-farming skills, while the Dietetics garden supports practical food-system learning on campus. PLAAS’s pan-African land-governance education and research on farming and pastoral livelihoods extend the discussion to land rights, agroecology and management. Their dates and audiences remain explicit. [E05] [E26]
Evidence and context
Growing food and knowledge with local communities
An accessible community garden in Gugulethu
UWC supported hands-on gardening education at Thembalethu Protective Workshop in Gugulethu in 2024. At the project launch on 25 June, the Cape Flats Nature Reserve Unit supplied plants, tools and visual teaching aids and demonstrated planting techniques. The initiative brought together UWC’s Dr Gerard Filies, the workshop and the Khoi-San-E Foundation, with the aim of building members’ gardening skills and self-sufficiency. Partners introduced worm farming to produce compost and supported plans for accessible raised beds. The project connects sustainable growing practices with community participation and inclusive access to gardening. [E05, Article body]
Plant propagation, worm farming and shared practical skills
The project partner’s account adds detail to the Gugulethu workshop. UWC donated indigenous plants and demonstrated plant propagation, while the Khoi San E Foundation provided vegetables and herbs. The foundation demonstrated how kitchen scraps, cardboard and shredded paper could be used in a worm farm to produce compost, and explained how participants could establish additional worm farms. These activities combined practical plant-growing skills with resource reuse, supporting the centre’s ambition to develop a productive garden. [E06, Article body]
A campus garden for food and nutrition learning
In October 2024, UWC’s Dietetics Department opened a vegetable and herb garden outside the Dietetics Building. Third-year Dietetics and Community Development Nutrition students developed the space with lecturer Elsabe Nel and the Gardens and Grounds Department. The garden emphasised indigenous edible and medicinal plants and gave students experience in growing food, identifying plants and applying nutrition-programming principles. It provides a practical setting for learning about nutrition and sustainable food systems on campus. The launch also highlighted opportunities for future community involvement and a potential contribution to student food support. [E07, Article body]
Building African land-governance knowledge
A no-fee 2024 course for selected land professionals
PLAAS offered its accredited online short course on the Political Economy of Land Governance in Africa from 22 to 26 July 2024 with the African Land Policy Centre. Teaching addressed natural-resource access and management, customary and statutory tenure, women’s land rights, rural and urban land administration, large-scale land acquisition and the climate crisis. Selected participants paid no course fees, with support from GIZ and UNECA through NELGA, although they needed their own reliable internet connection. The programme was designed for experienced land professionals and policymakers, extending university learning beyond enrolled students. [E03, Article body]
A pan-African learning network
PLAAS’s August 2024 account describes land professionals from across Africa taking part in its NELGA course. Participants represented civil society, government, the private sector and academia. Eighteen lecturers and facilitators contributed to the five-day online programme coordinated by Professors Moenieba Isaacs and Ruth Hall. Discussions connected land tenure, rural and urban administration, women’s land rights and climate pressures. This combination of professional learning and regional exchange strengthened opportunities to discuss how land governance can respond to the needs of communities and future generations. [E04, Article body]
Food systems, agroecology and land rights
For World Food Day 2024, PLAAS advertised a three-hour online NELGA masterclass on Food Systems and Land Governance with Professor Mamadou Goïta. The session linked agricultural production and food sovereignty to land rights, tenure and changing food systems. Its scope explicitly included agroecological approaches as a route towards more sustainable land use and farming. The public invitation connected research on food systems with practical questions about the people who live on and work the land, and supplied reading materials for further learning. [E08, Article body]
Climate responses and rural land governance
PLAAS’s NELGA lecture series offered a September 2024 masterclass with Dr James Murombedzi on the connections between climate change and land governance. The advertised online session examined how climate finance, carbon credits, forestry and renewable-energy investment affect rural landscapes and access to land. It invited participants to consider the consequences of climate responses for communities whose livelihoods depend on natural resources. The advertised programme brought questions of land degradation, sustainable development and equitable resource governance into professional education. [E09, Article body]
Evaluating professional learning
PLAAS commissioned an evaluation of its land-governance short course, completed in December 2024. The study drew on 163 alumni survey responses, five focus groups and six key-informant interviews across several course cohorts. Respondents reported gains in understanding and confidence, and described using course learning in research, project work, policy and advocacy. These are self-reported professional outcomes, rather than measured ecological changes. The evaluation also identifies access and language biases and calls for continued learning opportunities, providing a basis for improving future provision. [E21, Executive summary pp vii–viii; printed pp 2, 4, 7]
Research for sustainable farming and pastoral livelihoods
Recognising pastoral knowledge in Southern Africa
A 2024 study involving UWC’s Khululiwe Primrose Ntombela and Igshaan Samuels documents how pastoralists in South Africa and Namibia respond to climate and resource pressures. Based on fieldwork undertaken from 2014 to 2016 in eight communal areas, it identifies 46 coping and adaptation strategies, including supplementary feeding, livestock mobility and income diversification. The research also highlights constraints such as restricted grazing access, land degradation and declining transmission of traditional knowledge. Its contribution is to make locally developed knowledge visible in policy debates, so that adaptation support can build on existing skills and practices rather than overlook them. [E19, Article body]
Exploring supplementary fodder in water-limited areas
UWC and Agricultural Research Council researchers investigated hydroponic fodder as a supplementary feed source for livestock in water-limited Northern Cape communities. Their July 2025 Water Research Commission report records practical training in Paulshoek and engagement with Concordia farmers. An included invitation dates the Paulshoek demonstration to 2 December 2023. The team subsequently presented its barley-fodder work at the Grassland Society of Southern Africa and Arid Zone Ecology Forum conferences in 2024. The research explores feed quality, water sources, growing structures and costs, while identifying contamination and seasonal-management challenges that need to be addressed before wider adoption. [E20, Executive summary v; printed pp 76–80 (physical 92–96)]
Learning from experienced livestock farmers
A 2025 study involving UWC and Agricultural Research Council researchers explores what can be learned from experienced livestock farmers about sustainable rangeland management. Interviews with 100 purposively identified “champion” farmers across South Africa’s nine provinces, conducted between 2020 and 2022, examined how farmers assess grazing resources, livestock condition and their own practice. Farmers commonly used forage quantity and plant species to judge rangeland condition, alongside records of rainfall and animal health. The authors propose using this practical expertise to strengthen farmer-to-farmer learning through extension services. The study provides a research foundation for education; it does not document an already delivered training programme. [E22, pp 10–13, 18–20]

Study farms and South African biomes in Figure 2 of the champion-livestock-farmer study, published in 2025. The study was conducted from January 2020 to December 2022. Credit: Ngoako L. Letsoalo and co-authors, 2025. Figure 2, CC BY 4.0. Unchanged. Image source. CC BY 4.0.
Continuing pan-African land-governance education
The 2025 NELGA course, advertised for 31 March–4 April, continued PLAAS’s partnership with the African Land Policy Centre. Its curriculum explicitly linked conservation, food systems and the climate crisis with land governance, alongside women’s land rights, land administration and pressures on the commons. Selected online participants were offered places without course fees, supported by GIZ and UNECA. This continuing professional programme connects land-management debates with a broader African network of practitioners and policymakers. [E26, Article body]
Completing the 2025 land governance course
At the virtual graduation on 24 June 2025, UWC’s Rector and Vice-Chancellor celebrated the successful conclusion of the seventh pan-African accredited short course and welcomed 74 graduands. His address identifies the continuing partnership with the African Land Policy Centre and GIZ-supported land-governance networks. Together with the course curriculum and no-fee offer for selected online participants, this provides a dated record of professional learning completed in 2025. [E33, pp.1–2] [E26, curriculum and fees]
Learning and exchange on sustainable tourism
UWC’s Leisure and Tourism Conference opened on 3 October 2024, bringing sustainability into professional exchange among researchers, educators and practitioners. The full account retains the advertised fees and themes, the retrospective confirmation of the event and the local-government and international partnership. [E14] [E15]
Evidence and context
Professional exchange on sustainable tourism
UWC’s Leisure and Tourism Conference
UWC’s first Leisure and Tourism Conference, scheduled for 3–4 October 2024, brought sustainable tourism into a broader programme for researchers, educators and practitioners. The advertised themes also included outdoor and adventure recreation, community recreation and inclusive tourism. Participation was charged: the published early-registration rate for academics and practitioners was R3,500, rising to R4,000 after 15 July; student and one-day rates were also offered. The programme offered a forum for professional exchange on tourism sustainability. [E14, Article body]
A local-government and international partnership
The World Leisure Organization’s retrospective account confirms that the Leisure and Tourism Conference opened on 3 October 2024 and included international presentations. The organisation’s visit also continued its collaboration with UWC and the City of Cape Town. This confirms that the advertised conference took place and situates it within a local-government and international partnership. [E15, Article body]
Land stewardship and biodiversity
Supporting land ecosystems through action
Institutional commitments to terrestrial conservation
Council’s natural-environment statement recognises sustainable natural-resource practices and protection of campus biodiversity, specifically the Cape Flats Nature Reserve. The complete subsection approved on 26 June 2025 and the separate earlier Council commitment remain visible below, with reporting titles and approval dates distinguished. [P03] [PX07]
Evidence and context
Council commitment to the natural environment
Council’s Statement on Transformation and Sustainability in the Annual Report 2024 recognises sustainable natural-resource practices and protection of campus biodiversity, with specific reference to the Cape Flats Nature Reserve. The statement was approved on 26 June 2025. Its complete natural-environment subsection follows, from the 77-page spread edition. The 2024 reporting title does not backdate the approval of this statement. [P03, Natural environment: physical p.27 / printed p.53; approval: physical p.28 / printed p.54]
Council commitment to the natural environment
Council Statement on Transformation and Sustainability | Version 2024 reporting year, 77 physical PDF pages / 152 printed pages | Approved 26 June 2025 | Effective Council statement approved 26 June 2025; separate implementation date not stated
This complete natural-environment subsection was approved by Council on 26 June 2025. The approval appears on physical page 28, printed page 54.
The natural environment
• Enhancing sustainable approaches to natural resources through institutional practices and ongoing academic inquiry through teaching, learning and research activities; and
• Protecting the natural environment and biodiversity on campus, especially as represented in the UWC Cape Flats Nature Reserve. [P03, 77-page spread edition: physical p.27 / printed p.53; approval physical p.28 / printed p.54]
Earlier commitment to campus biodiversity
UWC’s earlier Council statement, approved on 23 June 2022 in the 2021 Annual Report, committed to sustainable natural-resource practices and protection of campus biodiversity, specifically the Cape Flats Nature Reserve. This provides an earlier record of Council’s commitment to the campus’s natural environment. [PX07, Natural-environment subsection: printed pp.47–48; Council approval: printed p.48]
Species of conservation concern
The reserve’s records identify plants of conservation concern, including a historical record of Lessertia argentea, classified as Endangered in SANBI’s national assessment. The full account preserves the 2018 observation date and the distinction between historical occurrence and a current population estimate. The 2025 inventory is retained under Maintaining ecosystems and biodiversity. [B17] [B20]
Evidence and context
Species of conservation concern
A plant recorded in the reserve
The reserve’s published overview records the green-snakestem pincushion, Leucospermum hypophyllocarpodendron subsp. hypophyllocarpodendron, among its Cape Flats vegetation. This botanical record forms part of the Nature Reserve Unit’s account of the habitats and plants it conserves. [B01, Cape Flats Nature Reserve ecosystem description]
A documented refuge for threatened plants
A 2018 UWC survey reported several Lessertia argentea plants within the reserve. SANBI’s national assessment classifies this coastal-dune plant as Endangered and identifies urban development and invasive plants among its threats. The historical record explains the value of retaining small habitat remnants; it does not provide a current reserve population estimate. [B20, Floral survey results] [B17, National Status, habitats and threats]
Biodiversity in campus planning and development
UWC’s Infrastructure Management Policy covers land holdings, environmental compliance and alignment with the Campus Development Plan. Its spatial principles address land and water, indigenous vegetation and green space. The complete selected provisions and document-control table remain below, alongside the separately reported 2024 landscaping project and environmental-risk oversight. [P01] [P03]
Evidence and context
Land stewardship and biodiversity in campus planning
UWC’s Infrastructure Management Policy was approved on 22 September 2022 and implemented on 23 September 2022. It covers university land holdings and makes environmental compliance part of infrastructure and land management. New infrastructure must align with the Council-approved Campus Development Plan. Its spatial principles call for working with land and water, appropriate use of indigenous vegetation, green space, local engagement and efficient land use. The policy also requires sustainability in projects while preserving practical, financial and whole-life planning conditions. The selected provisions below set out these responsibilities and conditions. [P01, Cover; sections 1–2,4.2,4.3,4.5; Annexures A–C]
Indigenous, waterwise campus gardens
In the third quarter of 2024, UWC’s Campus Landscaping Project introduced indigenous, waterwise gardens intended to reduce water use and improve biodiversity. This was a reported campus intervention; the Annual Report does not quantify resulting water savings or changes in biodiversity. [P03, Annual Report 2024, Rector and Vice-Chancellor’s report, Campus Safety; 77-page spread edition: physical p.15 / printed p.28]
Environmental-risk oversight
The Annual Report 2024 identifies the Council Safety, Health and Environmental Risk Committee as dealing with health, safety and environmental-risk issues. This places environmental risk within UWC’s Council-level governance structures. [P03, Annual Report 2024, Report on Risk Exposure Assessment, The governance of risk management; 77-page spread edition: physical p.32 / printed p.62]
Source note: Annexure A(a) names the National Energy Act No. 34 of 1998. The quoted wording is retained. The official government record identifies the Act as 34 of 2008. [P01, Annexure A(a), physical/printed p.9] [PX06, Official Act title]
Infrastructure Management Policy: original document control
|
|
UWC
|
||
|
Infrastructure Management Policy
|
Council Approval Reference Number
First Approval
C2022/03 (22 September 2022)
Amendments
|
||
|
Implementation Date
|
23 September 2022
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment
|
n/a
|
||
|
Revision / Amendment Date
|
n/a
|
||
|
Provisos
|
n/a
|
||
|
Policy Owner
|
Infrastructure and Engineering
|
||
|
Executive Management Portfolio
|
ED – Finance and Services
|
||
|
Contributors
|
EMC, SPRC, SEC, IBDC, Council
|
||
|
Circulated by:
|
Executive Director – Finance and Services
|
||
|
Circulated to:
|
Institutional Planning and Infrastructure and Engineering staff members.
|
||
University of the Western Cape
Infrastructure Management Policy
[P01, original cover; physical PDF page 1]
1 Purpose and 2 Scope
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
The policy’s purpose and scope include sustainable resource use and the management of university land holdings.
1 Purpose
The purpose of this Infrastructure Management Policy is to establish a Council approved policy for key infrastructure-related principles and objectives that the University’s executive management needs to pursue over time. The Policy is supported by
a) a long-term spatial development framework (Campus Development Plan); and
b) an annually-updated 3-5-year infrastructure management plan;
which promote the efficient, economic, effective and sustainable use of resources.
2 Scope
This document establishes the University’s policy for the management of its infrastructure. It includes the management of:
a) the demand for infrastructure;
b) the creation and prioritisation of a pipeline of interventions; as well as
c) the management of land holdings. [P01, 1 Purpose and 2 Scope; physical pages 4; printed pages 4]
4.2 opening and 4.2.1 Life-cycle planning
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Executive Management oversees infrastructure management, supported by lifecycle planning for operation, maintenance and refurbishment.
4.2 Management of infrastructure
The University will manage its infrastructure based on the principles set out in Annexure A.
The University’s Executive Management is responsible for all aspects of infrastructure management and these functions are largely executed on its behalf by the Executive Director: Finance and Services.
In this regard the University will attend to:
4.2.1 Life-cycle infrastructure asset management planning for large individual assets or groups of infrastructure assets, which include operation, maintenance and refurbishment requirements. This planning will inform major refurbishment or upgrading requirements which are incorporated into the infrastructure management plan. [P01, 4.2 opening and 4.2.1 Life-cycle planning; physical pages 5; printed pages 5]
4.2.2 Facilities management
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Facilities responsibilities include plumbing maintenance, incident records, waste services, contractor performance and demobilisation. The nested numbering beginning at 5 is retained from the original.
4.2.2 Facilities management, ensuring that:
a) the necessary internal and external facilities management resources are in place;
b) engineering infrastructure management including the following, occurs:
5) budgeting and preparation for planned as well as unplanned maintenance;
6) regular checking of hard services (mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) services) to keep them serviceable with special attention being paid to critical infrastructure;
7) identification and establishment of condition monitoring and inspection plans as per the operating and maintenance manuals to check, test or replace infrastructure systems, subsystems, assemblies or components;
8) preventative (scheduled, routine) maintenance plans are drafted and implemented;
9) all breakdowns are addressed immediately and repairs planned and prioritised; and
10) a record is made of infrastructure breakdowns and incidents which can be analysed to identify trends to inform decisions;
c) the day to day soft services (e.g. cleaning, security, catering, fire protection, waste management, reception services) are done properly and that staff or contractors and their performance is measured and reported against performance specifications; and
d) demobilisation of facilities management (e.g. Service Level Agreements) for infrastructure that will be disposed of as well as for infrastructure earmarked for upgrades, refurbishments or rehabilitation. [P01, 4.2.2 Facilities management; physical pages 5; printed pages 5]
4.2.3 Infrastructure information system
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
An infrastructure information system supports management decisions and risk-control assurance.
4.2.3 Progressive development of an infrastructure management system to provide reliable, consistent and updated infrastructure information to enable optimised decisions to be made, which should:
a) be used to inform infrastructure management activities; and
b) provide improved risk control assurance that the objectives in the infrastructure management policy will be achieved on a consistent basis. [P01, 4.2.3 Infrastructure information system; physical pages 5; printed pages 5]
4.2.4 Entering into leases for infrastructure for use by the University or for the leasing of University infrastructure and the administration thereof.
[P01, section 4.2.4; physical/printed page 5]
4.2.5 Occupational health, safety and environmental compliance
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Environmental compliance is expressly included in infrastructure and land management.
4.2.5 The management of all occupational health and safety and environmental compliance matters in relation to infrastructure and the usage of land. [P01, 4.2.5 Occupational health, safety and environmental compliance; physical pages 5; printed pages 5]
4.2.6 to 4.2.8 and complete oversight Table 1
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Environmental compliance is assigned to the Executive Director: Finance and Services, with oversight by the Safety, Health, Environment and Risk Committee.
4.2.6 Access management and security required to safeguard University infrastructure and land.
4.2.7 Management of all ICT infrastructure.
4.2.8 Reporting of infrastructure management-related matters to the oversight committees identified in Table 1, who will approve actions that are necessary for the progressive implementation of principles associated with the management of University infrastructure as set out in Annex A.
Table 1: Oversight committees
|
Item
|
Area of management
|
Responsible person
|
Oversight committee
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
4.2.8.1
|
Life-cycle infrastructure asset management planning
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
|
|
4.2.8.2
|
Mobilisation for facilities management
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
|
|
4.2.8.3
|
Development of an infrastructure management system
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
|
|
4.2.8.4
|
Leases for infrastructure
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Finance Committee
|
|
4.2.8.5
|
Occupational health and safety and environmental compliance
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Safety, Health, Environment and Risk Committee
|
|
4.2.8.6
|
Access and security
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Safety, Health, Environment and Risk Committee
|
|
4.2.8.7
|
ICT infrastructure
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Information, Communication and Technology Governance Committee
|
|
4.2.8.8
|
Infrastructure development implementation oversight
Project Boards
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
• Infrastructure Business Development Committee
• Council
|
|
4.2.8.9
|
Infrastructure development project proposals
|
Executive Management
|
• Infrastructure and Business Development Committee
• Senate Physical Resources Committee
|
|
4.2.8.10
|
Infrastructure acquisitions
|
Executive Management
|
• Infrastructure and Business Development Committee
• Finance Committee
• Council
|
|
4.2.8.11
|
Infrastructure development funding
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Executive Management Committee
• Finance Committee
|
|
4.2.8.12
|
Infrastructure procurement and contract awards
|
Executive Director: Finance and Services
|
• Tender Committee
|
[P01, sections 4.2.6–4.2.8 and complete Table 1; physical/printed pages 6–7]
4.3 Spatial development frameworks
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
The Council-approved Campus Development Plan provides the long-term spatial framework for campuses and guides planning for new infrastructure.
4.3 Spatial development frameworks
4.3.1 The University will have a Campus Development Plan (CDP) providing a long-term overall spatial vision for its campuses drawing upon the universal spatial development principles outlined in Annex B. The CDP is a Council approved document and the University Council will approve any significant changes to it.
4.3.2 The University will ensure that all planning for new infrastructure is aligned with the Campus Development Plan. [P01, 4.3 Spatial development frameworks; physical pages 7; printed pages 7]
4.4 ICT infrastructure plans: second subsection labelled 4.3.2 in the original
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
ICT change management includes procedures and reporting for appropriate decommissioning and responsible disposal of equipment.
4.3.2 Changes to any of the University’s ICT infrastructure or systems should follow the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) change management framework which include procedures and reporting to control the movement and location of assets and allow for the appropriate decommissioning and responsible disposal of any ICT equipment. [P01, 4.4 ICT infrastructure plans: second subsection labelled 4.3.2 in the original; physical/printed page 7]
4.5 Infrastructure management plans
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Annual infrastructure planning brings together development, maintenance, rehabilitation, disposal, prioritisation and readiness for implementation.
4.5 Infrastructure management plans
4.5.1 The University will develop an annual Infrastructure Management Plan, that will include planning for new infrastructure, as well as plans for the operation, maintenance, refurbishment and rehabilitation of existing infrastructure, and disposal of infrastructure which is no longer required to meet the University’s objectives, and it will be based on:
a) factors such as policies, norms and standards, condition assessments, functional performance, student enrolment trends, student housing demand trends, current and forecasted levels of optimisation, and academic requirements;
b) the infrastructure planning principles contained in Annexure C;
c) the grouping of projects into programmes to enable cash flow projections for projects during a financial year to be adjusted and funds to be moved between projects within a programme to avoid under-expenditure without changing the purpose for which funds were approved; and
d) the readiness of projects for implementation.
4.5.2 The University will ensure that the following is undertaken for all projects admitted to a pipeline of projects at Stage 0 (Project Initiation) in accordance with the provisions of the University’s Procurement Policy:
a) the identification of the impediments and constraints to project implementation and establishment of the timelines required to resolve them;
b) the identification of high risk critical infrastructure; and
c) the prioritisation of projects and the establishment of realistic budgets and timelines over a 3 to 5-year period. [P01, 4.5 Infrastructure management plans; physical pages 7, 8; printed pages 7, 8]
Annexure A(a): regulatory framework
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
The regulatory framework includes environmental, heritage, building, energy and occupational safety legislation.
a) The requirements of the following regulatory framework need to be met:
• The Occupational Health and Safety Act including the
- Construction Regulations,
- Electrical Installation Regulations
- Pressure Vessel Regulations,
- Lift Escalator and Passenger Conveyer Regulations,
- Driven Machinery and General Machinery Regulations;
• The National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act including the National Building Regulations; and
• The National Heritage Resources Act.
• The National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998
• The National Energy Act No. 34 of 1998 [P01, Annexure A(a): regulatory framework; physical pages 9; printed pages 9]
Annexure A(c): environmental, social and economic impacts
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Infrastructure value is considered alongside environmental, social and economic impacts.
c) The value of infrastructure needs to be optimised i.e. the cost of the infrastructure provided to achieve the University’s objectives and service standards should be minimised, whilst also considering environmental, social and economic impacts. [P01, Annexure A(c): environmental, social and economic impacts; physical pages 9; printed pages 9]
Annexure A(g): infrastructure risks and bulk services
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Risk management includes identifying critical infrastructure, mitigating failure and continuing investment in bulk services.
g) Risks relating to the ownership, use and operation of infrastructure need to be managed as follows:
• the possible consequences of failure of infrastructure needs to be identified and mitigated in a cost-effective manner;
• critical infrastructure should be identified using a risk-based approach by assessing both the probability of failure and the potential impact on the University’s operations;
• high risk infrastructure needs to be prioritised, especially if this is potentially life- threatening or poses a risk to the achievement of the University’s core objectives; and
• the University’s liability in the event of infrastructure-related claims needs to be minimised.
• Appropriate and continuing investment in bulk services infrastructure (water, electricity and fire) [P01, Annexure A(g): infrastructure risks and bulk services; physical pages 9, 10; printed pages 9, 10]
Annexure A(f) Alternatives to acquiring infrastructure
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Where possible, changed infrastructure needs are addressed through existing facilities, reconfiguration, sharing or leasing.
f) Where possible, changes in demand for infrastructure need to be met with solutions which do not require the acquisition of new infrastructure, taking into consideration the university’s whole portfolio (for example, maximising the use of existing facilities, or reconfiguring them, rather than building new ones, considering sharing expensive specialist facilities between universities and leasing of existing infrastructure). [P01, Annexure A(f) Alternatives to acquiring infrastructure; physical/printed p.9]
Annexure A(h): water-efficient infrastructure
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Infrastructure is expected to be accessible, energy-efficient, water-efficient and sustainable.
h) The University’s infrastructure should be accessible, energy-efficient, water-efficient and sustainable. [P01, Annexure A(h): water-efficient infrastructure; physical pages 10; printed pages 10]
Annexure A(k) and (l): condition and service assessments
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Condition and service-performance assessments inform infrastructure plans, budgets and user requirements.
k) There needs to be periodic condition assessments of infrastructure, the results of which need to be captured on the infrastructure asset register and used to inform infrastructure plans and budgets.
l) There needs to be a periodic assessment of the levels of performance and service that infrastructure delivers, and these should be analysed against the requirements and expectations of users. [P01, Annexure A(k) and (l): condition and service assessments; physical pages 10; printed pages 10]
Annexure A(o): stakeholder consultation
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Infrastructure planning includes consultation with relevant stakeholders.
o) There needs to be consultation with relevant stakeholders regarding infrastructure plans. [P01, Annexure A(o): stakeholder consultation; physical pages 10; printed pages 10]
Annexure B(2): Integration
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
The integration principle links place-based research, local outreach and engagement with surrounding communities.
2) Integration
Integration refers to the University as an institution committed to being place-bound. This is based on a recognition that an increased sense of belonging results in an increased sense of purpose. This has several spatial implications as it;
• places great importance on place-based research;
• emphasises the need to undertake outreach activities in local communities;
• underpins a need to engage with the host cities/ towns, surrounding communities and institutions; and
• implies that the University needs to become good neighbours and as such take an active interest in their surroundings on an academic, community and spatial level.
The promotion of integration in a society historically obsessed with separation is an important issue to address. Such integration should include:
• integration with the host-city / host-towns or surrounds;
• integration of modes of movement;
• social and cultural integration;
• integration in sport; and
• academic integration. [P01, Annexure B(2): Integration; physical pages 11, 12; printed pages 11, 12]
Annexure B 3) Quality of shared/common spaces
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
The shared-space principle includes land, water and indigenous vegetation, alongside heritage and safety considerations.
3) Quality of shared/common spaces
Any plan for the University needs to consider place making i.e. the creation of a sense of spatial uniqueness and identity. An important part of this is developing an appropriate response to the site. The spatial implications of this include working with the land, working with water, use of landmarks and the appropriate use of indigenous vegetation.
The aim of all universities should be to promote a holistic teaching and learning environment, as opposed to just a classroom-based one. Central to this is recognising the importance of informal mixing and social contact between students of diverse disciplinary backgrounds as part of the total educational experience. The implication of this from a spatial perspective is the creation of dignified, pleasant places of meeting in the public realm. A variety of shared spaces should be offered, which represent the primary informal gathering or meeting spaces for students, staff and residents alike. The dignity of these places will impact on the dignity of the university campuses.
Safety and security and heritage considerations need to be taken into account in the creation of these common spaces. [P01, Annexure B 3) Quality of shared/common spaces; physical pages 12; printed pages 12]
Annexure B(4) Robustness and flexibility
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Green space forms part of the public structure of the campus, within a coherent spatial framework operating across scales.
4) Robustness and flexibility
The spatial framework needs to be strong enough to give clear direction yet sufficiently minimalist to accommodate growth and change. Planning cannot be driven by programmes - it needs to be based on the elements of public structure i.e. green space, movement of all modes, shared public facilities (libraries, meeting places, sports facilities and recreation, performance and display spaces), hard open space, housing and utility services. These need to be woven together into a coherent framework which creates a logic of access, ranging from very public or exposed to very private.
Planning needs to reflect a consistency of thought across scales which requires a ‘package of plans’ approach, with each larger scale providing the fixes for successively smaller scales. Connecting scales and integrating city activities is an important part of the challenge. [P01, Annexure B(4) Robustness and flexibility; physical/printed p.12]
Annexure B 6) Sustainability and efficiency, plus concluding framework
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
Spatial planning addresses efficient land use and the environmental and cultural character of the campus setting.
6) Sustainability and efficiency
Decisions taken in relation to the location, design and management of the institutions need to be geared towards optimal sustainability. The university campuses should play a leadership role in demonstrating sustainable practices. The University should demonstrate best practice in terms of a broad spectrum of environmental and sustainability including efficiency of land utilisation.
The academic vision and the spatial directions of universities should be considered as complementary and synergistic. Direction should accordingly be derived from:
• interrogating the University’s mission statement, which provides the highest order of direction for the spatial development plan, to explore the spatial implications of the academic mission;
• identifying the desirable performance qualities which a university in South Africa in the 21st century should be seeking to achieve which have spatial implications; and
• a comprehensive understanding of the contextual informants (the concrete things which have material substance, shape, topography, environmental character, climate, texture, as well as socio- economic features) which embody very different properties, in accordance with the unique cultural and environmental conditions of the place within which the University campus is located.
Academic vision for a particular campus can also have spatial implications for in the creation of:
• living and working environments of a quality that attracts and retains world renown academics;
• adequate library, student resource amenities, student accommodation with meals and self- catering and IT facilities.
The method employed in the development of spatial plans needs to elevate planning and design from opinion to argument in order to seek sufficient consensus around the desired norms and their spatial implications. [P01, Annexure B 6) Sustainability and efficiency, plus concluding framework; physical pages 13; printed pages 13]
Annexure C Infrastructure planning principles complete
Infrastructure Management Policy | Version C2022/03 | Approved 22 September 2022 | Effective 23 September 2022
The complete planning annex sets out the role of stakeholder expectations, baseline assessment, alternatives, lifecycle costs, affordability, sustainability and practical future-proofing.
Annexure C: Infrastructure planning principles
Infrastructure projects are identified, planned and costed, as relevant, by:
a) obtaining and considering the expectations and requirements of stakeholders in the University;
b) determining appropriate levels of service and identifying the infrastructure required to meet this level of service and to achieve the University’s strategic objectives;
c) establishing an infrastructure baseline by reviewing existing infrastructure assets, including the identification of mission-critical assets;
d) assessing existing infrastructure assets in terms of their efficiency of use, and proposing improvements;
e) identifying any gaps between the existing infrastructure and the required infrastructure;
f) considering all possible ways of meeting the gaps, such as building new infrastructure, renting infrastructure, utilising existing infrastructure more effectively, reconfiguring existing infrastructure or sharing infrastructure with other institutions, to determine the best solutions to the gaps;
g) taking a ‘whole-portfolio’ approach when considering options for addressing gaps, enabling all available options to achieve the required levels of service to be considered, ensuring the provision of infrastructure at the lowest life-cycle cost;
h) analysing asset management information;
i) determining the functional requirements and required level of service for new infrastructure and applying the space and cost norms to the needs for new infrastructure;
j) comparing the needs against the budget, and prioritising in terms of this policy if the needs exceed the budget; and
k) planning for capital projects taking into account the operation and maintenance of the infrastructure for its entire estimated design life after it has been constructed.
l) Integrating sustainability principles and strategies into all projects
m) Future proofing all projects, as far as it is practical and cost-effective, against changes in the environmental (e.g. climate change), technological (e.g. 4IR) and regulatory spheres.
Adequate access control and monitoring infrastructure needs to be put in place to provide a safe environment for the University community.
Credible forecasts of the current and net demand for services or requirements for functionality should be made over a period of not less than ten years. [P01, Annexure C Infrastructure planning principles complete; physical/printed p.14]
Open/download the complete Infrastructure Management Policy (PDF)
Managing alien-species impacts
The Nature Reserve Unit describes continuous weeding and mechanical or chemical control of alien vegetation, with attention to Port Jackson and fire-affected areas. Regional invasive-species research and a 2025 catchment study add evidence for management, retaining their study scope and the distinction between intended applications and completed interventions. [B01] [B12] [T03]
Evidence and context
Controlling invasive vegetation
The reserve’s management approach aims to retain natural veld while minimising disturbance. Its continuous weeding programme targets woody alien plants, especially Port Jackson (Acacia saligna). Staff use mechanical or chemical control according to the density and location of seedlings, weeds and grasses, and check fire-affected areas for germinating Acacia seeds. [B01, Management section]
Testing progress on invasive-species control
A regional assessment co-authored by UWC-affiliated CapeNature scientist Andrew A. Turner examined invasive-species management in 18 protected areas covering 677,584 hectares of the Cape Floristic Region. Published online in November 2024 and assigned to a 2025 journal issue, the study combined management-plan reviews, species lists and 2010–2022 spending and treatment records. Only six of 226 regulated invasive species had species-specific control plans, while management reached 24% of protected-area land. The authors found insufficient and declining funding, incomplete monitoring and uneven effectiveness, and recommended more diversified funding, biological control, appropriate prescribed fire and outcome monitoring. This provides evidence to improve regional management rather than claiming that clearing expenditure automatically delivers ecological recovery. [B12, Abstract, Methods, Results and Discussion]
Linking invasive plants and groundwater protection
In April 2025, the Cooperation in International Waters in Africa programme profiled UWC graduate researcher Mmasechaba Lebogang Moropane’s work on groundwater-dependent invasive plants in the Western Cape’s Heuningnes Catchment. Supported by the Southern African Development Community Groundwater Management Institute’s Young Professionals programme, she was using satellite techniques to map the plants and investigate their relationship with groundwater. The stated aim was to inform environmental and water-resource managers about invasive-species clearing and native-species protection. At the time of the profile, connecting the findings with managers was an intended next step, rather than a completed management intervention. [T03]
Community partnerships around shared land ecosystems
PLAAS’s practitioner learning and collaborative research connect conservation with community livelihoods, rights and participation. The retained accounts include Living Landscapes, community rangelands and research around conservation areas, keeping partnership roles, dates and governance proposals distinct. [E18]
Evidence and context
Connecting biodiversity conservation with livelihoods and rights
Living Landscapes professional learning in 2024
PLAAS and Wageningen University brought conservation practitioners together for a five-day Living Landscapes course in KwaZulu-Natal from 26 February to 1 March 2024. The programme connected biodiversity conservation with rights, livelihoods, gender, law and social justice, and included field learning in conservation landscapes. The organiser reports 27 selected participants, including professionals from government, conservation organisations, NGOs and community-based organisations. South African participants joined colleagues from across Africa. The course was fully funded by the Oak Foundation. It created a setting in which practitioners could examine how conservation can support both biodiversity and the people who depend on land and natural resources. [E01, Article body]
Learning from communities around conservation areas
Living Landscapes links conservation research with the lives of communities in and around protected areas. A 2024 account from project funder Oak Foundation describes PLAAS research associate Maud Sebelebele living and working alongside residents of Den Staat Farm near Mapungubwe, learning through everyday activities including cattle herding. The wider project also engages Cape Town wetland communities and communities neighbouring iSimangaliso Wetland Park. Researchers examine how people’s access to nature, livelihoods and cultural connections can be recognised in conservation. The programme has also fostered Mazingira Yethu, an alumni network that continues discussions and shares knowledge through virtual meetings. [E02, Article body]

Wetland landscape used by PLAAS for its Living Landscapes project page, first published in 2022 and updated in 2024. The photograph’s capture date and exact location are unverified. Credit: Photographer not identified on PLAAS source page. Image source.
Sharing conservation research through animation
On 15 October 2024, Professor Moenieba Isaacs hosted a screening of a Living Landscapes in Action animation alongside the International Marine Conservation Congress in Cape Town. Co-produced with Dr Lerato Thakholi, the eight-minute film introduced the project’s case for integrating biodiversity conservation with social and spatial justice. Its focus extended across Mapungubwe, iSimangaliso and Cape Town landscapes. By making research accessible through animation, PLAAS created a public-facing learning resource about how conservation decisions affect the people living in and around protected areas. [E10, Article body]
Community rangelands and collaborative research
REPAiR: linking ecology, institutions and livelihoods
PLAAS introduced REPAiR in December 2024 as a three-year research partnership examining community-led approaches to nature-based solutions in Southern African rangelands. The project connects ecological questions with the social and political conditions affecting communal grasslands and livestock livelihoods. Its dated 2024 project account describes collaborative research with Meat Naturally Africa, bringing together natural and social scientists, livestock farmers and civil-society groups to understand how landscape stewardship interacts with local institutions, policy and history. [E11, project introduction] [E27, project description and Our approach]
A partnership active in 2024
A November 2024 account from REPAiR researcher Amber Huff places the project’s work in the context of communal livestock farming and nature-based solutions. It documents a team visit to a research site in July 2024 and explains the partnership with Meat Naturally Africa, whose existing work with communal farmers includes regenerative herding, training and incentives. REPAiR studies these interventions through multiple forms of knowledge, examining how ecological conditions, local institutions, policy and history shape their effects. The approach emphasises understanding the realities of rangeland communities before assuming which conservation measures will work. [E27, Article body]
Community perspectives on ecosystem governance
Livelihoods and cultural heritage in the Mapungubwe landscape
A 2025 Living Landscapes policy brief examines how biodiversity conservation, farming and cultural heritage meet at Den Staat Farm in the Mapungubwe landscape. Maud Sebelebele, Lerato Thakholi and Moenieba Isaacs draw on prolonged community-based research, including dialogue and feedback with residents. The brief identifies tensions involving wildlife damage to crops, access to grazing, sacred places and participation in conservation decisions. It also records collaboration with Nkuzi Development Association on community rights education. The authors argue for conservation arrangements that recognise local livelihoods and cultural connections alongside biodiversity, rather than treating protected areas as separate from their neighbouring communities. [E16, pp 1–4, 7]
Social and spatial justice in urban conservation
A PLAAS policy brief published in February 2025 on urban conservation in Cape Town considers why biodiversity governance needs to recognise how neighbouring communities use natural spaces. Zina Jacobs, Mafaniso Hara and Frank Matose examine three nature reserves and a conservation area, considering resources used for livelihoods, energy, culture, spirituality and recreation. Their policy brief argues that conservation areas cannot be managed in isolation from the needs of nearby communities. It contributes a social-ecological perspective to decisions about access and urban biodiversity, grounded in ethnographic research. [E17, Policy brief pp.1–5]
Community participation around iSimangaliso
In a 2025 policy brief, PLAAS researchers Siphesihle Mbhele, Ayanda Madlala and Moenieba Isaacs examine the experiences of Dukuduku and KwaNibela communities around iSimangaliso Wetland Park. Their analysis connects conservation to grass harvesting, agriculture, fishing and access to culturally important plants and places. The authors identify barriers to meaningful participation and recommend accessible communication, the inclusion of local knowledge and clearer community roles in co-management. This research supports discussion of how conservation and local livelihoods can be governed together, while recognising that consultation alone does not guarantee shared decision-making. [E18, pp 7–11]
Conservation boundaries, access and shared benefits
A 2024 article by Bram Büscher and PLAAS-affiliated researcher Lerato Thakholi examines how conservation fences connect wildlife protection with property rights and social justice in South Africa. Drawing on historical, policy and legal debates, the authors distinguish the protective functions of fencing from the restrictions it can place on neighbouring communities. They propose approaches that would retain necessary protection while widening participation, access and the sharing of conservation benefits. Their discussion includes rights to wildlife, wildlife restitution and cross-border conservation arrangements. The article contributes a governance perspective to biodiversity conservation: decisions about ecological boundaries also shape relationships between people, land and wildlife. These are research proposals, rather than evidence of reforms already implemented. [E32, Abstract, sections 5–6 and conclusion, especially printed pages 7–10]
Land-sensitive waste and pollution
Land sensitive waste disposal
Water quality and discharge: governance context
UWC’s infrastructure provisions address environmental compliance, water-sensitive planning and infrastructure responsibilities. Their full wording and practical conditions are retained under Biodiversity in campus planning and development, alongside the original document-control table. [P01]
Campus plastic waste: policy context
The Procurement Policy’s environmental principles include pollution minimisation and improved use of natural resources. The selected purchasing provisions remain fully visible under Procurement context; the supplier requirements appear in the following waste-disposal section. [PX01]
Waste disposal and hazardous materials: responsibilities
UWC’s published supplier terms address contractor compliance with university procedures, safety requirements and hazard reporting. Their full selected text remains below, retaining the document’s undated status and contract-scope qualification. The infrastructure policy’s environmental responsibilities remain available in the planning section. [PX03]
Evidence and context
Contractor safety obligations
UWC’s public supplier terms address contractor compliance with university procedures, safety requirements and hazard reporting. The body is undated; its filename and metadata indicate 2023. The document does not identify the individual contracts into which these terms were incorporated during 2025. [PX03, Clauses 14 and 23; physical pp. 8–9, 13–14]
ANNEXURE “B”: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS: source provisions
This undated Annexure B begins with its terms rather than a separate approval cover or document-control table. The 2023 file identifier does not establish its incorporation into individual contracts.
ANNEXURE “B”: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
14. Compliance with Procedures
14.1. It is recorded that during the term of the agreement, UWC or its appointed UWC Representative may implement certain reasonable procedures and policies. The Service Provider shall comply fully with any such reasonable procedures and policies, including the work procedures and health and safety procedures, provided that such policies and procedures shall have been provided to it in writing or is made accessible to the Service Provider.
14.2. The Service Provider shall ensure that it and its personnel shall at all times comply fully with any safety, fire, emergency and security procedures and policies applicable at UWC.
14.3. The Service Provider shall not transgress any rules, codes, policy documents, procedures and safety standards of UWC, which are available on request and of which the Service Provider must take notice.
14.4. Should UWC at any time believe that any member of the Service Provider’s personnel is failing to comply with any such procedures or policies, UWC shall be entitled to deny such staff member access to the relevant premises and require Service Provider to replace such person without delay.
14.5. The Service Provider shall keep safe any furniture and/or equipment and maintain and clean office, storage- and/or any change room facilities allocated by UWC to the Service Provider, in order to perform its duties.
14.6. The Service Provider and its staff shall not remove any property of UWC, or that of its employees, or its students from the premises of UWC without the written consent of UWC first being obtained.
14.7. The Service Provider and its staff shall abide by the security arrangements of UWC which may include any one or a combination of the following:-
14.7.1. body search;
14.7.2. presentation of personal identification documents or ID cards of UWC;
14.7.3. searching of personal bags / handbags /pockets / lockers;
14.7.4. finger printing;
14.7.5. any other lawful measure that may be required by the site concerned;
14.7.6. to hand in any lost item found to Campus Protection Services of UWC.
[PX03, section 14; physical PDF pages 8, 9]
23. Compliance with Occupational Health and Safety
23.1. The Service Provider:-
23.1.1. warrants that it is fully aware of the terms and conditions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;
23.1.2. acknowledges that it is an employer in its own right with duties and responsibilities as prescribed in the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;
23.1.3. agrees to ensure that all Works/ Services shall be performed and all equipment shall be used in accordance with the provisions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended,
23.1.4. accepts accountability for its employees and sub-contractors to the extent that such employees and sub-contractors (including any other personnel) contravene the provisions of the OHS Act and relevant Health and Safety Regulations as amended;
23.1.5. agrees to comply with all rules and regulations implemented by or on behalf of UWC on all sites relating to health and safety and will inform UWC immediately should Service Provider for any reason be unable to comply with the provisions of the OHS Act and such rules and regulations;
23.1.6. shall appoint a duly authorised representative to ensure the discharge of its duties in terms of Section 16(1) and (2) of the OHS Act for the term of the SLA;
23.1.7. shall ensure that all workers are familiar with UWC’s emergency evacuation program and that the correct emergency procedures will be followed in the event of an emergency situation or when an exercise is held.
23.2. In terms of Section 37(2) of the OHS Act, the following is hereby agreed:
23.2.1. the Service Provider shall be responsible for the implementation of the terms and provisions of the OHS Act and Regulations as amended in the area where the work/service is to be undertaken for UWC.
23.3. The Service Provider shall be responsible for the wellbeing, in relation to health and safety of all persons coming into such area in accordance with the OHS Act, subject to any directives issued by management of UWC. The Service Provider undertake to report to the Risk and Compliance Director of UWC any hazard to health and safety which exists or arises during the contract works or services in the area concerned, and over which the Service Provider has no control. The Service Provider shall issue all appropriate safety/health equipment to all persons working or coming into the area. The Service Provider furthermore agrees to specifically abide by and implement the provisions contained in UWC Safety Policy and the OHS Act.
23.4. In the event that any Regulations or State of Disaster and/or UWC Policy regarding any Pandemic be implemented, the Service Provider accepts and undertakes to strictly comply with the protocols and procedures of UWC and indemnify and holds UWC harmless against any claim flowing from any infection and/or in the event that any person, client, employee, agent, manager, or subcontractor fails to comply with any aspect of the National and/or UWC Covid-19 protocols and procedures.
Further contributions and context
Legal research for biodiversity protection
Examining the legal protection of ecosystems
UWC’s Global Environmental Law Centre studies how law can support conservation and the sustainable use of natural resources. Its biodiversity research theme covers terrestrial as well as aquatic ecosystems, with attention to protected areas, endangered species, wildlife crime, natural-resource governance and cross-border conservation. This legal scholarship complements the University’s ecological and land-governance research by examining the rules through which species and habitats are protected. [T04]
Connecting animal welfare and biodiversity conservation
UWC Faculty of Law’s 2024 publication list records Werner Scholtz’s article International (Wild) Animal Rights and Biodiversity: Resolving Conflicts Between Holism and Individualism, published in the Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy. The publication places animal rights and biodiversity within the University’s legal research record. It is a scholarly contribution rather than an adopted institutional policy or management procedure. [T06, Scholtz entry]
References
[B01] UWC Nature Reserve Unit. Undated; includes 2024 plant-sale schedule. UWC Nature Reserve Unit: Overview.
[B02] Harriet Box, Institutional Advancement. 2025-02-05. UWC Nature Reserve Sees Remarkable Growth in Fauna and Flora.
[B03] UWC Nature Reserve Unit. 2025-02-11. Nature Reserve Unit Faunal Survey reveals impressive results.
[B04] UWC Nature Reserve Unit. 2025-12-12. Nature Reserve Unit Biodiversity Survey reveals impressive results.
[B05] Harriet Box, Institutional Advancement. 2025-02-14. UWC A Proud Participant in Conserving Threatened Wetlands.
[B06] Pierre Mouski, Cape Peninsula Fire Protection Association; prepared for UWC. 2023-02-20. Prescribed Burn Plan: Cape Flats NR.
[B07] UWC Nature Reserve Unit. 2023-03-31. Prescribed burn planned to take place at the UWC Cape Flats Nature Reserve.
[B08] UWC Nature Reserve Unit. Undated live resource; some linked files updated to 2026. UWC Nature Reserve Unit: Species List.
[B09] Nathan Adams. 2025-11-18. Science And Collaboration Pay Off As Leopard Spotted In West Coast National Park.
[B10] Jeannine McManus; Albertus J. Smit; Lauriane Faraut; Vanessa Couldridge; Jaco van Deventer; Igshaan Samuels; Carolyn Devens; Bool Smuts. 2024-05-21. The Recolonisation of the Piketberg Leopard Population: A Model for Human–Wildlife Coexistence in a Changing Landscape.
[B11] Elina Lagcher; Kim Lensing; Mirte Bosse; Klaus Fischer; Gerrie Camacho; Jeannine McManus; Laura Tensen. Online 2024-12-11; issue March 2025. Red, gold, and green: comparative genomics of polymorphic leopards from South Africa.
[B12] Brian W. van Wilgen; Nicholas S. Cole; Johan Baard; Chad Cheney; Karen Engelbrecht; Louise Stafford; Andrew A. Turner; Nicola J. van Wilgen; Andrew M. Wannenburgh. Online 2024-11-29; issue 2025. Progress towards the control of invasive alien species in the Cape Floristic Region’s protected areas.
[B13] Hayley S. Clements et al., including Bryan Maritz and Andrew A. Turner. 2024-02-12. The bii4africa dataset of faunal and floral population intactness estimates across Africa’s major land uses.
[B14] Hayley S. Clements et al., including Bryan Maritz. Online 2025-12-03; issue 2026-01-01. A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa.
[B15] Harriet Box, Institutional Advancement. 2025-12-08. Africa’s Biodiversity Under Threat: Prof Bryan Maritz Contributes To New Research.
[B16] A.G. Rebelo; H. Mtshali; L. von Staden, SANBI. Assessment 2020-07-23; Red List version 2024.1. Leucospermum hypophyllocarpodendron subsp. hypophyllocarpodendron: National Assessment.
[B17] N.A. Helme and L. von Staden, SANBI. Assessment 2011-06-09. Lessertia argentea: National Assessment.
[B18] L. von Staden and T. Patel, SANBI. Assessment 2021-11-04; Red List version 2024.1. Babiana nana subsp. nana: National Assessment.
[B19] SANBI Biodiversity Advisor. Undated current record. Kedestes lenis lenis: Biodiversity Advisor taxon record.
[B20] Nicklaus Kruger. 2018-11-06. Faunal Survey 2018: What’s In UWC Nature Reserve – And How Do We Know?.
[E01] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. Undated retrospective event page. Living Landscapes 2024.
[E02] Oak Foundation. 24 July 2024. Living Landscapes: rethinking biodiversity.
[E03] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. 6 June 2024. Call for applications: Political Economy of Land Governance in Africa.
[E04] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. 12 August 2024; updated 19 August 2024. Africa’s land professionals learn from the sector’s best at sixth Nelga pan-African short course.
[E05] UWC Institutional Advancement. 28 October 2024. Gugulethu Gardening Project showcases UWC community engagement in action.
[E06] Khoi San E Foundation. 25 June 2024 (event date displayed). Thembaletu Project: Empowering Hope.
[E07] UWC Institutional Advancement. 23 October 2024. University of the Western Cape Follows Global Trend in Establishing Its First Food Garden.
[E08] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. 30 September 2024; updated 26 November 2024. NELGA Masterclass: Food Systems and Land Governance.
[E09] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. 5 September 2024; updated 9 October 2024. NELGA Masterclass: Climate Change and Land Governance.
[E10] Deshnee Subramany / PLAAS. 18 October 2024; updated 3 March 2025. Watch: Living Landscapes in Action – a call for conservation to integrate social, spatial justice.
[E11] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. 11 December 2024; page updated 31 July 2026. Resilient and Equitable Nature-based Pathways in Southern African Rangelands (REPAiR).
[E12] UWC Centre for Humanities Research. 2 October 2024 (article metadata). The CHR and Boschendal’s joint Heritage Day Arts Education Workshops and Puppetry Parade.
[E13] UWC Institutional Advancement. 5 December 2024. Exploring Barrydale’s Untold Struggles.
[E14] UWC Institutional Advancement. 19 June 2024. Leisure and Tourism Conference 2024.
[E15] World Leisure Organization. 28 October 2024. WLO advances partnership with South Africa through a series of events.
[E16] Maud Sebelebele, Lerato Thakholi and Moenieba Isaacs / PLAAS. February 2025. Why livelihoods, culture, and heritage matter for the people of the Mapungubwe Cultural Landscape, Limpopo, South Africa: PLAAS Policy Brief 64.
[E17] Zina Jacobs, Mafaniso Hara and Frank Matose / PLAAS. February 2025; latest repository version 16 May 2025. Living landscapes in action: the importance of social and spatial justice realism in urban conservation: PLAAS Policy Brief 63.
[E18] Siphesihle Mbhele, Ayanda Madlala and Moenieba Isaacs / PLAAS. February 2025. Co-management: a failed promise for the Dukuduku and KwaNibela communities surrounding the iSimangaliso Wetland Park: PLAAS Policy Brief 65.
[E19] Khululiwe Primrose Ntombela, Margaret Angula, Igshaan Samuels, Clement Cupido, Melvin Swarts, Ewaldine Menjono-Katjizeu, Emilia Inman and Jesaya Nakanyala / Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice. 29 August 2024. Pastoral coping and adaptive management strategies to climate change in communal areas in Namibia and South Africa.
[E20] C. Cupido, F. Müller, I. Samuels, T. Mpanza, A. Engelbrecht and I. Kekaya / WRC. July 2025; WRC 3218/1/25. Evaluating the potential of hydroponic fodder production – Implications for smallholder and communal farmers in water-limited agro-ecological areas in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa.
[E21] Daniel Moody / PDG, commissioned by PLAAS. 6 December 2024; uploaded April 2025. Tracer and Impact Study of the NELGA short course entitled the Political Economy of Land Governance in Africa: Final Report.
[E22] Ngoako L. Letsoalo, Igshaan M. Samuels, Julius T. Tjelele, Khululiwe P. Ntombela, Cupido F. Clement, Jodene Foster, Thantaswa Zondani, Andiswa Finca and Adriaan Engelbrecht / Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development. January–March 2025; accepted 26 February 2025. Understanding the attributes and knowledge to achieve sustainable farming in South African rangelands: Learning from champion livestock farmers.
[E23] PLAAS. 29 May 2025; updated 12 June 2025. Living Landscapes in Action Masterclass: Decolonising conservation, rights, livelihoods, access – cases from southern Africa.
[E24] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. 12 June 2025; updated 4 November 2025. Call for applications: New thinking on integrating biodiversity and social justice short course.
[E25] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. 2025; retrospective materials available. Land, Life and Society Conference 2025.
[E26] University of the Western Cape / PLAAS. 2025 course webpage; application deadline 3 March 2025. The Political Economy of Land Governance in Africa 2025.
[E27] Amber Huff / REPAiR. 20 November 2024. Introducing REPAiR.
[E28] Laurenda van Breda / Fynbos Forum 2025. 2025 Fynbos Forum abstract book. The Cape Flats Nature Reserve: future-proofing fynbos through education, awareness and community engagement within an urban context.
[E29] Harriet Box / UWC. 21 May 2025. UWC’s Cape Flats Nature Reserve Hosts its First Nature Photography Competition to Raise Biodiversity Awareness.
[E30] Talia Naicker, Laurenda van Breda and Minnelise Levendal / UWC and Zeitz MOCAA. September 2025, EEASA conference abstract book. Nature to Nurture: A Collaborative Exhibition between the UWC Nature Reserve Unit and the Zeitz MOCAA Art Club.
[E31] Quinton Mtyala, Institutional Advancement / UWC. 13 October 2025. PLAAS Marks 30 Years With Conference On Land, Life, And Justice.
[E32] Bram Büscher and Lerato Thakholi / Land Use Policy. Available online 13 March 2024; Land Use Policy 141 (2024), article 107134. Convivial fences? Property, ‘right to wildlife’ and the need for redistributive justice in South African conservation.
[T01] Thabang Maphanga, Cletah Shoko, Mbulisi Sibanda, Kgabo Humphrey Thamaga and Timothy Dube. 2024-07-02. Understanding the spatio-temporal distribution of bush encroachment in savannah rangelands South Africa.
[T02] Thabang Maphanga, Cletah Shoko, Mbulisi Sibanda, Blessing Kavhu, Corli Coetsee and Timothy Dube. 2025-02-27. Bush encroachment with climate change in protected and communal areas A species distribution modelling approach.
[T03] Cooperation in International Waters in Africa World Bank programme. 2025-04-07. Researching the effects of groundwater dependent invasive species in South Africa.
[T04] UWC Global Environmental Law Centre. Undated. Biodiversity Ecosystems and Oceans research area.
[T05] Werner Scholtz. 2024-11-18. International wild animal rights and biodiversity resolving conflicts between holism and individualism.
[T06] UWC Faculty of Law. 2024 publication list; undated page. UWC Faculty of Law Journal Articles 2024.
[P01] University of the Western Cape. Council approval 22 September 2022; implementation 23 September 2022. Infrastructure Management Policy.
[P03] University of the Western Cape Council. Statement approved 26 June 2025; reporting year 2024. Council Statement on Transformation and Sustainability, UWC Annual Report 2024 (77-page spread edition).
[PX01] University of the Western Cape. Main amendment 27 March 2025; addendum approved 28 June 2018. Procurement Policy with Infrastructure Framework Addendum.
[PX03] University of the Western Cape. Undated body; filename 20 February 2023; PDF creation 24 February 2023. Annexure B General Terms and Conditions and Operational Requirements.
[PX06] South African Government. Act 34 of 2008. National Energy Act 34 of 2008.
[PX07] University of the Western Cape Council. Reporting year 2021; statement approved 23 June 2022. Council Statement on Transformation and Sustainability in UWC Annual Report 2021.
[E33] Robert J. Balfour, Rector and Vice-Chancellor / UWC. 24 June 2025. Rector’s Address at the Virtual Graduation for The Political Economy of Land Governance in Africa.
[E35] Kumi Naidoo / PLAAS. 15 October 2025. Biodiversity and climate crises are driven by the same extractive and profit-driven economic models.


